Former Jihadi Leader: Brotherhood Bought Al-Qaeda ‘Terror Support’ for $25 Million

By on April 11, 2014in

Yesterday on Haya TV, Nabil Na‘im, a former leader of Egypt’s Islamic Jihad and close confidante of current al-Qaeda leader, Ayman Zawahiri—who also helped found Egypt’s Islamic Jihad—asserted that, during the reign of former president Muhammad Morsi, Zawahiri was given $25 million from Muslim Brotherhood leader Khairat al-Shatter to organize, fund, and assemble the jihadi groups “in order to support the Brotherhood.” (For more on the Muslim Brotherhood/Al-Qaeda relationship, click here).

It should be noted that al-Shatter, though not a member of Morsi’s government—only a leader of the Brotherhood—was, after being imprisoned after the revolution, asked for personally by John McCain during his visit to Egypt some months back, when he pushed for Brotherhood reinstatement. Also, U.S. ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson was reportedly seen visiting Shatter often.

Earlier, Na‘im, the former Jihad leader had said that attempts by the U.S. to “reconcile” Egypt with the Muslim Brotherhood was “nothing but a conspiracy by the American administration,” and that the Brotherhood, when in power, had betrayed Egyptian sovereignty, adding that ousted president Morsi granted Egyptian citizenship to more than 60,000 Palestinians, many of whom were in the ranks of the jihad. Source


Obama Funds the Egyptian Government $1.5 billion. (2012)

In October 2010, on the eve of the Islamic revolution that the media fancies as “the Arab Spring,” the Supreme Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood called for jihad against the United States.You might think that this all but unnoticed bombshell would be of some importance to policymakers in Washington. It was not. This week, the Obama administration quietly released $1.5 billion in foreign aid to the new Egyptian government, now dominated by a Brotherhood-led coalition in parliament — soon to be joined by an Ikhwan (i.e., Brotherhood) luminary as president.It is not easy to find the announcement. With the legacy media having joined the Obama reelection campaign, we must turn for such news to outlets like the Kuwait News Agency

What the Times neglects to tell you is that Ismail, the extremist, is actually an Ikhwan guy. His father was a popular Islamist and he has already run for office twice as a Brotherhood candidate. These impeccable Islamist credentials make him broadly appealing not only to Salafists but to Brotherhood enthusiasts, as the Hudson Institute’s Samuel Tadros details in the best report to date on state of the Brotherhood in the aftermath of the revolution. (It is found in the latest edition of the essential series, Current Trends in Islamist Ideology.) There is little substantive daylight between Ismail and Shater — the Brotherhood and Salafists disagree mainly on the pace of change, not the direction.

Shater is the MB’s “Deputy Guide.” He is a revered figure: jailed by the Mubarak Regime for much of the past two decades and regarded as the “Iron Man” of the Brotherhood movement. Naturally, the Western press — the folks who package the Brothers as “moderates,” “pragmatists,” and even “secularists” — render Shater as a “businessman.” But he happens to be the businessman the Brotherhood has tasked to shape its comprehensive strategy for post-Mubarak Egypt. The Ikhwan refer to this as “the Nahda Project” — the Islamic Renaissance.



Secretary of State John Kerry said in a separate statement yesterday that “we firmly reject the unfounded and false claims by some in Egypt that the United States supports the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood or any specific Egyptian political party or movement.”


Nicole Gaouette and John Walcott at Bloomberg BusinessWeek have revealed that the Obama administration has specifically stated that it wants the Muslim Brotherhood to have a role in any new Egyptian government. Meanwhile, other news outlets, particularly the Associated Press, have avoided disclosing that specific detail.


2009 The Obama administration’s call for an “inclusive” political process in Egypt with a role for the Muslim Brotherhood has been overshadowed by conflict between security forces and supporters of the Islamist group.


Q: What do you mean by “our youth on the ground?”

A: Starting from 2006, the al-Jazeera training center systematically started training youth activists on social networks and citizen journalists, free of charge.  [Wadah Khanfar, director-general of al-Jazeera from 2006 until 2011, was in the middle of the developments that began in Tunisia in December 2010.]


Hillary Clinton and AlJazeera: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent ripples through the American press establishment last week when she commended Al Jazeera, long depicted as a media manifestation of Middle East extremism, for doing a better job than many American media outlets at covering the revolutions in the Arab world.”



Who’s Who in Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood

Exposed: The Muslim Brotherhood/Al-Qaeda Connection

Who’s Who in Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood

Muslim Brotherhood Spokesman and Former Clinton Foundation Employee Arrested in Cairo

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interpol in hunt for Austrian jihadist teenage girls

Staff writer, Al Arabiya News
Friday, 18 April 2014

Samra Kesinovic, 16, and Sabina Selimovic, 15, disappeared from their homes in the Austrian capital of Vienna on April 10. (Photo courtesy of Interpol)


Two Austrian teenage girls that authorities believe were tricked into travelling to Syria to fight for Islamist rebels are currently being searched for by Interpol.

Samra Kesinovic, 16, and Sabina Selimovic, 15, disappeared from their homes in the Austrian capital of Vienna on April 10, the Daily Mail reported.

However, the girls’ parents found a slew of posts of social media networks that suggested that had gone to fight for a “holy war” in Syria.

The girl’s parents – who are originally Bosnian refugees who settled in Austria after the ethnic conflicts of the 1990’s – claim that the messages are not being written by the girls.

Pictured: Sabina Selimovic. (Photo courtesy of Interpol)

They also said that the two girls had recently started frequenting a mosque run by radical Vienna-based Islamic preacher Ebu Tejma.

The holy warriors

The fathers of the girls are said to be abroad looking for their daughters, who have not been in contact with their parents.

Photos on the girl’s pages on social networking giant Facebook show them holding AK47 assault rifles.

Pictured: Samra Kesinovic, assumed to be fighting for a jihadist group in Syria. (Photo courtesy of Interpol)

In one posting, the girls announced plans to marry in order to become “holy warriors,” and in another, they say that “death is our goal.”

Austrian officials say that the pair are likely in a jihadist training camp and are already married to their new rebel husbands.

Under jihadi imam rules these jihadi neanderthals can get married, have sex, and then divorced, hey presto. I pray for a happy ending for these young girls.

Related -

New Fatwa Permits Rape of Non-Sunni Women in Syria

Pregnant with Aids: Tunisian Girl Recounts Her Sex Jihad in

Tunisian comfort women go to Syria for ‘Sex Jihad

Pregnant with Aids: Tunisian Girl Recounts Her Sex Jihad in

Sexual Jihad: “You lie down with the Devil, you wake up in

Muslim Cleric Urges Poor Women to Become Sex-Slaves

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lebanon diva dubbed Lady Gaga copycat

Staff writer, Al Arabiya News
Friday, 18 April 2014

A Lebanese singer has been accused of imitating Lady Gaga after she posted a picture of herself online in what seemed to be a bathroom, wearing a form fitting black leather body suit paired with a black veil and sunglasses.

Maya Diab posted a picture that stirred controversy among Arab media outlets, who accused her of imitating Lady Gaga. (Photo courtesy: Instagram)

Maya Diab was among many singers who performed at the concert of veteran Lebanese musician Ziad al-Rahbani. (Photo courtesy: Facebook)

Maya Diab wore the bizarre costume, by popular Lebanese designer Nicolas Jebran, to a concert in Casino du Liban. The daring fashion statement was found to be similar to Lady Gaga’s style by several media outlets.

Social media users also expressed their opinions.

A user on photo and video-sharing website, Instagram, equated the all-black look with a “cockroach,” while another thought she was “daring” and had a positive view of the singer’s attire.

User angel_sh1 said: “this is your level, the bathroom,” in a swipe at the starlet.

The Lebanese diva is not the first Arab diva to be compared to Lady Gaga. Another Lebanese singer, Miryam Fares, was accused of imitating Lady Gaga’s exaggerated fashion style and couture costumes by social media users.

Miryam Fares is popularly dubbed the “Queen we Stage,” as she focuses heavily on dancing and choreographed performances in her music videos and concerts.

Meanwhile, it is not the first time Maya Diab has been accused of imitating a Western singer. She was previously touted as a copycat of Beyonce.

They’re stunning looking women.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CIA Will Soon Roll Out Death Squads to Deal With Activists in Eastern Ukraine

Kurt Nimmo
April 18, 2014

Senator Chris Murphy, the Connecticut Democrat who urged punishing the Russian people in response to Crimeans voting to secede from post-coup Ukraine, questioned CIA boss John Brennan’s recent trip.

Russia demands explanation for CIA trip to Ukraine.

“What message does it send to have John Brennan, the head of the CIA in Kiev, meeting with the interim government? Does that not confirm the worst paranoia on the part of the Russians and those who see the Kiev government as essentially a puppet of the West?” Murphy said on MSNBC earlier this week.


“I don’t know the wisdom of having Brennan there. We ultimately don’t want this to be viewed as a proxy fight between the United States and Russia.”


Brennan’s presence in Kyiv, however, was not simply intended to underscore U.S. support for the largely fascist junta, but also send a message to Russia that the CIA will now work with the neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy, boss of the Ukrainian National Security Council, and other coup leaders as the eastern part of the country follows the path taken by Crimea.


For the establishment media in the United States, the takeover of administrative buildings by “militants” in eight cities is part of a Russian effort to annex eastern Ukraine. This script, however, was dealt a setback on Friday when the activists said they are not part of an agreement reached by Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva on Thursday.


“Lavrov did not sign anything for us, he signed on behalf of the Russian Federation,” said Denis Pushilin, head of the Donetsk People’s Republic.


The Gannett combine that owns USA Today did not include additional remarks by Pushilin. “This is a reasonable agreement,” he said of the Kerry-Lavrov agreement. “but everyone should vacate the buildings and that includes Yatsenyuk and Turchynov,” two leaders of the coup government in Kyiv. He then called for a referendum that will allow “self-determination of the people,” a political move opposed by the United States following its installation of fascists and their collaborators in Kyiv.


Due to the ineptness of the junta and the failure of its eastern operation to prevent secession, the CIA will now step in and direct the effort which will, undoubtedly, result in the whole slaughter of Ukrainians opposed to the fascist regime installed by the United States.


“The CIA director was sent to Kiev to launch a military suppression [campaign] in eastern and southern Ukraine, former Russian territories for the most part that were foolishly attached to Ukraine in the early years of Soviet rule,” former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts told RIA Novosti on Tuesday.


This military suppression will undoubtedly be augmented by the sort of sadistic behavior fascists revel in. Now that Svoboda ultranationalist Parubiy and his thuggish Right Sector counterpart, Dmytro Yarosh, are in control of the security apparatus in Ukraine, the CIA has a dream team in place for torture and mass murder.


The CIA’s track record in this department is legend. It has set up and managed death squads in El Salvador, Guatemala, in pre-Sandinista Nicaragua, in Europe (the Gladio “stay behind” operation), Haiti, Angola, Bolivia, Chile, Egypt, Vietnam (Phoenix program) East Timor, Honduras, Indonesia, Iraq, Georgia, and many other countries. Death squads are routinely used when traditional military tactics fail to suppress political opposition, as is the case in eastern Ukraine. Source


“Here is how that plan is going to work: America, the most prosperous and freest nation on earth, will be brought to its knees in an economic leveling process that will purposely make it reliant on other nations of the world – so much so that America will, in the hopes of people like Kissinger and David Rockefeller, eagerly accept and submit to world government.


I urge you to read Kissinger’s entire article for yourself, but, even two months later, it is impossible to interpret it in any other way than as a blueprint for what Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress would do with their “unique opportunity.””


I feel like a rewind recorder but sincerely believe the Ukrainian people should remain independent. You’re told it’s not feasible financially but it’ll be a heck of a lot worse if you become a slave to the World Bank/IMF route!!! Otherwise it’s Russia. Think of the WB/IMO as lucifer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Hillary For President” Fundraiser Busted For Illegal Campaign Contributions

April 18, 2014

If you listen carefully, you can hear the stampede of politicians distancing themselves from their once best-friend – Hotel magnate Sant Singh Chatwal – as AP reports, he plead guilty Thursday to charges he secretly funneled more than $180,000 in illegal campaign contributions to three unnamed candidates and coached someone to lie about it.

Without the contributions “nobody will even talk to you,” Chatwal said. “That’s the only way to buy them, get into the system.” Welcome to the ugly truth of American politik.

Hillary Clinton and Sant Singh Chatwal Source

The FT details that Sant Singh Chatwal, chairman of Hampshire Hotels Management, pleaded guilty on Thursday to making more than $180,000 in illegal federal campaign donations to three candidates through “straw donors” who were reimbursed, the DoJ said in a statement.

He raised at least $100,000 for Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign against Barack Obama.

The justice department did not comment on whether Mrs Clinton was one of the three candidates, but it said there was no allegation that candidates took part in or were aware of Mr Chatwal’s scheme.

Mr Chatwal was skirting legal limits on contributions to an individual candidate’s campaign of $2,300 in 2008 and $2,400 in 2010.

As AP explains the fraud was extensive…

Court papers allege that between 2007 and 2011, Chatwal used his employees, business associates and contractors who worked on his hotels to collect contributions from straw donors in Queens, Long Island and elsewhere. He then arranged to pay the donors back, a violation of the election laws.

As part the scheme, an unnamed business associate submitted a bill to Chatwal for $104,745 in 2011 for purported work done for one of Chatwal’s companies. Prosecutors allege that $69,000 of the total actually was reimbursement for money the associate had raised via straw donors.

In a conversation recorded in 2012, Chatwal instructed the associate that if he were asked if Chatwal gave him the money back, he should respond, “Never.”

Chatwal directly backed several Democratic candidates with his own money — at least $31,200 since 2004, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Among them were New York Reps. Joe Crowley and Gary Ackerman, along with California Rep. Howard Berman and Florida Rep. Robert Wexler. He also gave money to Montana Sen. Jon Tester, Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner.

And leaves the ugly truth of American politics behind…

An informant caught Sant Singh Chatwal on tape in 2010 explaining that he believed his illegal fundraising bought him access to people in power.

Without the contributions “nobody will even talk to you,” Chatwal said. “That’s the only way to buy them, get into the system.” Zero Hedge


Unfortunately Mr Chatwal is right! As Hillary Clinton stated in reference about Benghazi: “What difference does it make now”. Perhaps Mr Chatwal will get a break since “what difference does it make now” worked for Hillary. But we all know that won’t happen.

There’s no longer even a smidgeon of moral intergrity left in that corrupt cesspool of a government.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The United States of SWAT?

Military-style units from government agencies are wreaking havoc on non-violent citizens

John Fund
April 18, 2014

Regardless of how people feel about Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s standoff with the federal Bureau of Land Management over his cattle’s grazing rights, a lot of Americans were surprised to see TV images of an armed-to-the-teeth paramilitary wing of the BLM deployed around Bundy’s ranch.

They shouldn’t have been. Dozens of federal agencies now have Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams to further an expanding definition of their missions. It’s not controversial that the Secret Service and the Bureau of Prisons have them. But what about the

  • Department of Agriculture,
  • the Railroad Retirement Board,
  • the Tennessee Valley Authority,
  • the Office of Personnel Management,
  • the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and
  • the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

All of these have their own SWAT units and are part of a worrying trend towards the militarization of federal agencies — not to mention local police forces.

“Law-enforcement agencies across the U.S., at every level of government, have been blurring the line between police officer and soldier,” journalist Radley Balko writes in his 2013 book Rise of the Warrior Cop. “The war on drugs and, more recently, post-9/11 antiterrorism efforts have created a new figure on the U.S. scene: the warrior cop — armed to the teeth, ready to deal harshly with targeted wrongdoers, and a growing threat to familiar American liberties.”

The proliferation of paramilitary federal SWAT teams inevitably brings abuses that have nothing to do with either drugs or terrorism. Many of the raids they conduct are against harmless, often innocent, Americans who typically are accused of non-violent civil or administrative violations.

Take the case of Kenneth Wright of Stockton, Calif., who was “visited” by a SWAT team from the U.S. Department of Education in June 2011. Agents battered down the door of his home at 6 a.m., dragged him outside in his boxer shorts, and handcuffed him as they put his three children (ages 3, 7, and 11) in a police car for two hours while they searched his home. The raid was allegedly intended to uncover information on Wright’s estranged wife, Michelle, who hadn’t been living with him and was suspected of college financial-aid fraud.

The year before the raid on Wright, a SWAT team from the Food and Drug Administration raided the farm of Dan Allgyer of Lancaster, Pa. His crime was shipping unpasteurized milk across state lines to a cooperative of young women with children in Washington, D.C., called Grass Fed on the Hill. Raw milk can be sold in Pennsylvania, but it is illegal to transport it across state lines. The raid forced Allgyer to close down his business.

Brian Walsh, a senior legal analyst with the Heritage Foundation, says it is inexplicable why so many federal agencies need to be battle-ready: “If these agencies occasionally have a legitimate need for force to execute a warrant, they should be required to call a real law-enforcement agency, one that has a better sense of perspective. The FBI, for example, can draw upon its vast experience to determine whether there is an actual need for a dozen SWAT agents.”

Since 9/11, the feds have issued a plethora of homeland-security grants that encourage local police departments to buy surplus military hardware and form their own SWAT units. By 2005, at least 80 percent of towns with a population between 25,000 and 50,000 people had their own SWAT team. The number of raids conducted by local police SWAT teams has gone from 3,000 a year in the 1980s to over 50,000 a year today.

Once SWAT teams are created, they will be used. Nationwide, they are used for standoffs, often serious ones, with bad guys. But at other times they’ve been used for crimes that hardly warrant military-style raids. Examples include angry dogs, domestic disputes, and misdemeanor marijuana possession.

In 2010, a Phoenix, Ariz., sheriff’s SWAT team that included a tank and several armored vehicles raided the home of Jesus Llovera. The tank, driven by the newly deputized action-film star Steven Seagal, plowed right into Llovera’s house. The incident was filmed and, together with footage of Seagal-accompanied immigration raids, was later used for Seagal’s A&E TV law-enforcement reality show.

Many veteran law-enforcement figures have severe qualms about the turn police work is taking. One retired veteran of a large metropolitan police force told me: “I was recently down at police headquarters for a meeting. Coincidently, there was a promotion ceremony going on and the SWAT guys looked just like members of the Army, except for the police shoulder patches. Not an image I would cultivate. It leads to a bad mindset.”

Indeed, the U.S. Constitution’s Third Amendment, against the quartering of troops in private homes, was part of an overall reaction against the excesses of Britain’s colonial law enforcement. “It wasn’t the stationing of British troops in the colonies that irked patriots in Boston and Virginia,” Balko writes. “It was England’s decision to use the troops for everyday law enforcement.”

There are things that can be done to curb the abuses without taking on the politically impossible job of disbanding SWAT units. The feds should stop shipping military vehicles to local police forces. Federal SWAT teams shouldn’t be used to enforce regulations, but should focus instead on potentially violent criminals. Cameras mounted on the dashboards of police cars have both brought police abuses to light and exonerated officers who were falsely accused of abuse. SWAT-team members could be similarly equipped with helmet cameras.

After all, if taxpayers are being asked to foot the bill and cede ground on their Fourth Amendment rights, they have the right to a transparent, accountable record of just what is being done in their name.

– John Fund is national-affairs columnist at National Review Online. National Review

“From the article: One retired veteran of a large metropolitan police force told me: “I was recently down at police headquarters for a meeting. Coincidently, there was a promotion ceremony going on and the SWAT guys looked just like members of the Army, except for the police shoulder patches. Not an image I would cultivate. It leads to a bad mindset.””

That’s actually what I thought on seeing the picture above.

Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces, by Radley Balko [available at Amazon].

At both federal and state levels, the formerly hard line between police and military has blurred. Police are increasingly using military weaponry, employing military tactics and framing their mission using military terminology…. In Rise of the Warrior Cop, Radley Balko chronicles the steady militarization of the police in the U.S. A detailed history of a dangerous trend, Mr. Balko’s book tracks police militarization over the past 50 years, a period that not coincidentally corresponds with the rise of SWAT teams….

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

VIDEO: Cliven Bundy, Rand Paul Respond to Harry Reid’s “Domestic Terrorist” Slur

April 18, 2014

Published on Apr 18, 2014 -  Rand Paul On Harry Reid Calling Bundy Supporters Domestic Terrorists

Published on Apr 17, 2014 – This level of immorality leaves me rather speechless.
The personal is political, the political personal. When you see the big picture, you see how everything is connected.

“During a ‘Hashtags & Headlines’ event at the Paris Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, Reid referred to Bundy supporters as “Nothing more than domestic terrorists,” adding, “I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism.”” – Harry Reid.

Despite Reid’s characterization of Bundy supporters as “domestic terrorists,” the only violence metered out during the dispute was when BLM agents tasered and assaulted Bundy supporters during an incident on April 9.

No matter where you stand on the Bundy issue, Reid’s characterization of American protesters as “domestic terrorists” is chilling and a massive backlash is almost certain to follow.

It also fits the narrative that the federal government has been pushing for years through literature such as the MIAC report, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists. In 2012, a Homeland Security study was leaked which characterized Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.

Reid attracted controversy earlier this week when he promised that the BLM’s fight with Bundy was “not over”. The Nevada Senator was hit with accusations of cronyism after his former staffer Neil Kornze was confirmed as the new BLM director earlier this month.

Reid is obviously angry after his complicity in the siege against the Bundy family was exposed and became a viral story. Although many news outlets claimed this issue was “debunked,” Reid’s involvement in a solar farm just 35 miles from Bundy’s ranch is documented. Archived files which were deleted from the BLM’s own website confirm that confiscating Bundy’s cattle was necessary in order to clear the way for lucrative solar deals with transnational corporations.

Meanwhile, the BLM has admitted slaughtering two prize bulls belonging to Cliven Bundy during their round up of his cattle. The BLM claims the bulls “posed a safety hazard” but refused to elaborate. Bundy supporters have pointed to photographs which appear to show one of the bulls having suffered a gunshot wound. source

Obama, Harry Reid, Pelosi, non-elected heads of the Alphabet Agencies, et al are rolling out a social engineering plan which is why we’re hearing about Domestic Terrorism more often, along with guns, and son on…  The International Bankers have been directing Obama from behind the scenes – shadow government – and want an excuse to decree Martial Law.  If they don’t find one they’ll do what they’ve always done, make up another false flag! USA Inc. want our guns because when everyone discovers we’re been sold to the International Bankers, and see their bank balance at zero, it’s not going to be pretty. Thanks a lot President Wilson.

“Confrontional Children Can Become Terrorists”.

And now we have one of Obama’s chief advisor agent from Homeland Security proclaiming that “Confrontional Children Can Become Terrorists”. Little kids can’t even have a toy gun. A baby throwing a bottle might be a terrorist. Parents your children could become terrorists is the message! This is really all about branding – branding people all people as terrorists. Guilty until proven Innocent which stands the constitution on its head. We’re now witnessing the takeover of foreign banks grabbing our land for pennies. And when one rewinds back to Waco it was the Feds who had kids at the front of the barrel of their guns. I’m now considered a domestic terrorist because I support peaceful Cliven Bundy rather the real domestic terrorists who threatened to shoot the people present. And early during the protest people were tasered, a cancer victim thrown to the ground, attack dogs – the BLM was breaking the law. The BLM broke the law! They destroyed the ranch’s infrastructure, rustled his cattle, and shot a some them. So who were the domestic terrorists in this protest? Remember, they are the servants and we are the masters - written in the Constitution.

The real terrorists are within the UN/NATO-White House and International Bankers who’ve been present in every war and “revolution” since the beginning of time.

Today is just another chapter, another time, another method, same people, same results.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Eleventh Marble

by Michael Rivero

Any five-year old child knows that if you put ten marbles into a tin can, you can only take ten marbles back out. No amount of wishful thinking, dreaming, or praying, will yield that eleventh marble from inside that can. That eleventh marble does not exist. It never did, and it never will. All discussions about the eleventh marble are the product of imagination. The eleventh marble is a fantasy.

Private central bankers issuing the public currency as interest-bearing loans operate on the belief that they can put ten marbles (dollars) into a tin can (the world) and magically get 11 marbles (dollars) back out. Thus, we may conclude that the bankers are dumber than five-year old children! But unlike five-year old children, the bankers will take your home, your business, and your nation when they don’t get that eleventh marble! The spoiled child may cry and throw a tantrum, but that will be the end of their upset. The spoiled banker, however, in his or her arrogant rage that they cannot have the eleventh marble their imagination says must still be in that tin can, may start a war before they will admit that eleventh marble was never really there.

Economies are like tin cans. Before you can take a marble out, you must have put a marble in. Nobody can give you a marble that does not exist, yet this simple reality is lost to the priests of that fantastic religion called “economics” in that unholiest of temples called the Private Central Bank. Their religious doctrine seems to be that there must always be an eleventh marble inside the tin can, and that the tin can unfairly withholds that eleventh marble, indeed cheats them of their right to the eleventh marble, purely out of spite. That faith in the existence of the eleventh marble, unseen and improvable, is the article of faith the religion of banking rests on. It is far easier to burn the heretics than to question the dogma.

Today we see the bankers, having already retrieved their ten marbles from the tin can, flogging the world for that missing eleventh marble. Greece does not have that eleventh marble, so they turn to Germany and ask, “Do you have an eleventh marble”, and Germany replies, “Sorry, but the bankers already took the ten marbles they put in our tin can, and we are searching for an eleventh marble ourselves. Try the Americans.” The Americans, of course, have only just surrendered the last of their ten marbles back to the bankers and are looking under seat cushions for that missing eleventh marble nobody seems able to find.

But the eleventh marble will never be found. After all that mayhem brought down on the tin can there still will be no eleventh marble. It does not exist. It never did, and it never will.

The problem with all modern reserve banking systems is that the moment the first bank note goes into circulation as the proceed of a loan at interest, more money is owed to the banks than actually exists. Ten marbles have been put into the tin can, but the bankers see 11 marbles owed back to them. Sooner or later the non-existence of that eleventh marble will create a crisis of faith. People will stop believing in the religion called private central banking, and that crisis of faith will bring the system crashing down, as did the Temple of Baal in ancient times when the Syrians saw through the priests’ trickery. This evil magic of creating money out of debt was a fraud all along, as fraudulent and silly as the idea that one can put ten marbles into a tin can, and take out eleven.

In ages to come economists will look back at this failed experiment in debt-based currency, and dump it into the same category of human folly as Tulip mania, The Nation of Poyais, Credit Mobilier, the Great South Seas Company, and Mortgage-Backed Securities.

UPDATE: Rebuttal to Steve Keen

Economist Steve Keen apparently took umbrage with my thesis of the Eleventh Marble and presented a long convoluted argument which distills down to, “The FED will create that 11th marble when needed.”

And he is correct that this is what they do. But what Keen fails to mention is that when the FED adds that 11th marble into the tin can of the US economy, they are now expecting twelve marbles back. When they add that twelfth marble, they will expect back a thirteenth, and so forth. But the original problem remains; the bankers are expecting to take out of the tin can more marbles (dollars) than actually exist!

Money as debt – full length documentary.


Unless they’re are stopped they’ll continue to create more wars, destruction, total devastation, and the death of millions of souls. They need strife and division of the people in order to conquer – their side and the other side. Divide and Conquer.

Example: After a number of decades the invading Normans and the Native Irish eventually assimilated. Edward III put a stop to that with the Statutes of Kilkenny. They need loyal subjects in order to continue the rape.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

How You Became a Slave to the International Bankers!

By Michael Rivero

In the good old days, after George Washington and the boys won the war to free us from the (private) Bank of England’s predatory and impoverishing practices, they set up a “revolutionary” economic system. The government created and issued all the public currency, spending it into circulation to purchase what the government needed, then after the currency circulated through society to fuel commerce, was taxed back to the government to balance the books.

Click for larger image

Banks existed, of course. But they were kept off to one side, and use of the banks was optional for the people of the United States. It was possible to go through one’s entire life without dealing with a bank if one chose to do so.
Click for larger image

This system not only reserved the choice whether to use the bank to the people, but it was a stable system, because as debt increased, the people could voluntarily choose to stop borrowing from the bank! That was one of the most important freedoms won during the revolution; the freedom to say “no” to the banks!
Click for larger image

Then, in 1913, a corrupt Congress and a corrupt President changed the structure of the nation’s economy and stole your freedom to say “no”! The economic system was reverted to a mirror of that same system the nation fought a revolution to be free of. The power to issue money was taken away from the government and given to the bankers and from that day onward, ALL money in circulation was created as the result of a loan at interest from the bankers to the government, to business, and to the people. There is no exception. Every dollar paid in salary, spent to purchase food or gas, or paid in taxes, began as an interest bearing loan. There is no money in circulation in the United States that did not start out as a loan at interest from the bankers at the privately-owned (private) Federal Reserve system.
Click for larger image

From that moment on, the freedom of the people to refuse to borrow from the banks and to refuse to pay interest was stripped away. To participate in the commerce of the United States at all means being forced to use money loaned at interest, to the profit of the bankers and the impoverishment of the public. Your freedom to say “no” was stolen by Congress in 1913, without your permission and before you were born.

When you have lost the freedom to say “no”, when you have no choice but to pay a percentage of your earnings as interest to the bankers whether in private debt or taxes to cover the gargantuan debts by the US Government itself, you are a slave to the bankers. And because more money is owed to the bankers than actually exists, because of the interest charged on the loan that created the money, the debt-slavery is permanent! No matter how hard you work, no matter how much you sacrifice, the debt can never be paid off. The system is intentionally designed to trap the nation’s population permanently in unpayable debt, to make them slaves to that debt and to the bankers.

This is the purpose behind the design of the Federal Reserve, the International Monitary Fund, the European Central Bank, and indeed every private central bank issuing the public currency as a loan at interest. This is why today every nation is drowning in created debt, and slaved to the private bankers. That is the reason for ever increasing taxes and decreasing benefits; to pay the bankers their unpayable interest on the public currency.

For that enslavement to succeed, your right and freedom to refuse that bank’s interest-bearing money must be stripped away. The government must force you to use that private central bank’s currency, loaned to you at interest, via the Legal Tender Laws. Therein lies your slave chains. You are ordered by the government, on pain of prison, to use the banker’s money, and to pay the interest charged by the bankers through your taxes.

Free people have the right to say “no.” Free people have a right to decide for themselves what medium of exchange they will use and to choose not to involve the bankers!

There is no freedom without the freedom to say “no.” Slaves cannot say “no” when ordered to surrender the products of their labor to their masters.

You are a slave.

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit.We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” — Woodrow Wilson 1919

Slavery exists only because the slaves have been taught to believe that slavery is the way the world is supposed to be. Beliefs are chains used to enslave free people. No chains of steel ever bound a human tighter than the chains made of the beliefs with which we are indoctrinated while young in the state schools and the churches.

Slaves used to be held prisoner by their belief in rule by divine right. Then the slaves regained their freedom when they realized that divine right is only an illusion created by the enslavers to trick the people into obedient servitude.

Then slaves were held prisoner by their belief in rule by chattel ownership of one’s body. Then the slaves regained their freedom when they realized that one person owning another is an illusion created by the enslavers to trick the people into obedient servitude.

Today the modern slaves (that is YOU) are held prisoner by their belief in compound interest; that they owe money that never existed to repay money created out of thin air. And you modern slaves will regain your freedoms when you realize that private central banking is just another illusion created by the enslavers to trick you into obedient servitude.

Stop believing.

Cry freedom!


Forgive ourselves the debts, ban usuary, and start over. These International Bankers only have power because we give it to them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Hitler vs Obama

Obama Hitler billboard - Mason City Globe Gazette Deb Nicklay - full.jpg

Bill Board Iowa USA - 2010 Source

May 14, 2012

Nazis are not fascists but belong to global socialism, a section of the radical left.


The United States of America is becoming more like Nazi Germany every single day. In fact, the Nazification of America is almost complete. The parallels between Nazi Germany and the United States of today are going to absolutely shock many of you. Most Americans simply have never learned what life was really like back in Nazi Germany. Under Adolf Hitler, Germany was a Big Brother totalitarian police state that ruthlessly repressed freedom and individual liberty.

Under Adolf Hitler, Germany adopted socialism, dramatically increased government spending and raised taxes to astronomical levels. Under Adolf Hitler,

  • abortion became legal in Germany,
  • the government took over health care and
  • Christianity was pushed out of the public schools and out of public life.

To prove all of these points, I am going to use extensive quotes from two sources. Kitty Werthmann was a child living a peaceful life in Austria when Hitler took over her nation. Her eyewitness accounts about what life was like under Nazi Germany are invaluable. In addition, I will also be quoting extensively from author Bruce Walker. He is the author of a book entitled “The Swastika Against The Cross: The Nazi War On Christianity”, and during his years of research he has uncovered some absolutely jaw dropping stuff. After reading the information in the rest of this article, there should be no doubt that the United States is becoming just like Nazi Germany.

Nazi Germany shows us what happens when the state becomes god.

Adolf Hitler was certainly more racist than the leaders of America are today, but other than that there are very few differences between the road that Adolf Hitler led Germany down and the path that the United States is being led down.

The following are 25 signs that America is rapidly becoming more like Nazi Germany….


#1 Nazi Germany was a totalitarian Big Brother police state that constantly monitored everything that German citizens did.

Today, the bureaucrats that run things in the United States are also absolutely obsessed with constantly trying to monitor us. For example, there are now control freaks that inspect the lunches of preschool students in certain areas of the country in order to make sure that they contain the “right” foods….

A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because the school told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious.
The girl’s turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the person who was inspecting all lunch boxes in the More at Four classroom that day.
The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs – including in-home day care centers – to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home.


It’s not only at airports but now happening at ball games – Fabian Socialists – >gradual increments. I’m beginning to think that even a trip to the local shopping mall might mean a run in with the TSA thugs if America keeps on going the way it’s going. source – google

Since their inception they’ve yet to catch a terrorist. So this can be nothing but a desensitizing excercise on our psyche

#2 Nazi officials often used their positions of power to force others to do dehumanizing things.

This is exactly what the TSA is doing today. It would be really easy to imagine some Nazi military officers forcing a young woman to walk back and forth in front of them several times so that they could admire her form. Well, that is what TSA agents are doing to American women today. The following comes from a recent Wired article….

TSA agents in Dallas singled out female passengers to undergo screening in a body scanner, according to complaints filed by several women who said they felt the screeners intentionally targeted them to view their bodies.
One woman who flew out of Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport several months ago said a female agent sent her through a body scanner three times after the agent commented on her “cute” body.


This image is from the UK. I’d rather clean toilets than do this job. Source

#3 In Nazi Germany, even women and children were treated like dehumanized cattle.

Well, today schoolchildren are being strip-searched all over the United States. Down in Georgia, one student was recently strip-searched by public school officials after another student falsely accused him of having marijuana.

Another student down in Albuquerque was recently forced to strip down to his underwear while five adults watched because he had $200 in his pocket. The student was never formally charged with doing anything wrong.

#4 In Nazi Germany, authorities could stop you and search you at any time and for any reason.

In America that is not supposed to happen, but it is happening. Last year, TSA “VIPR teams” conducted approximately 8,000 “unannounced security screenings” at subway stations, bus terminals, seaports and highway rest stops.

If you are not able to produce “your papers”, there is a good chance that you will get thrown into prison in America. For example, a 21-year-old college student named Samantha Zucker was recently arrested and put in a New York City jail for 36 hours just because she could not produce any identification for police.

#5 Under Adolf Hitler, there were massive increases in government spending.

According to eyewitness Kitty Werthmann, just about everyone was getting some sort of a handout from the German government….

Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.


Of course, as I have written about so many times before, this is the exact same thing that we are seeing in the United States today.

#6 Under Hitler, taxes were raised dramatically in order to pay for all of these social programs.

Kitty Werthmann says that “our tax rates went up to 80% of our income.

In the United States our tax rates have not gotten that bad yet, but when you total up all federal taxes, all state taxes, all local taxes, all property taxes and all sales taxes, there are a significant number of Americans that do pay more than 50% of their incomes in taxes.

The Fabian Socialists believe in ‘easing’ into absolute power by deceit. The Communists and Fascists believe in attaining power quickly by violence

One can read whole reams of economic literature written by both fervent followers of John Maynard Keynes and his attackers as well and never know that there was a German language edition of his profoundly influential General Theory late in 1936, for which Keynes wrote a special foreword addressed solely to German readers. By that time the National Socialist regime of Adolf Hitler was four months short of four years in power in Germany. Source

#7 The economy of Nazi Germany was very highly socialized.

As Ludwig Von Mises once correctly observed, the German economy under Hitler was not capitalist at all….

What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.


The United States has not gotten to the level of Nazi Germany yet, but we do have a socialist president and back in 2009 the cover of Newsweek boldly proclaimed that “We Are All Socialists Now“.

True case – video at link. Source

Small farms are shutting their doors. More land for the feds to sell to Harry Reids son (Clintons/Algore and on to China.

#8 In Nazi Germany, if you conducted business outside of the socialist paradigm you were heavily punished.

Well, the same thing is happening in the United States today. For example, the FDA has been running elaborate entrapment schemes that are designed to entrap producers of raw milk. Any “unauthorized commerce” is dealt with very strictly by the U.S. government these days.

#9 In Nazi Germany, government regulation of business got wildly out of control.

The following is eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldn’t meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business.
If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.
We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.


Of course we all know about all of the ridiculous regulations that the U.S. government is burdening businesses with today. In every day and age control freaks love to stick it to business people that are just trying to make a living.

#10 Under Hitler, free market capitalism was absolutely hated.

National Socialist theologian Gregor Strasser once stated the following….

We National Socialists are enemies, deadly enemies, of the present capitalist system with its exploitation of the economically weak … and we are resolved under all circumstances to destroy this system.


And as I have written about previously, a lot of Barack Obama’s strongest supporters are socialists and communists, and an increasing number of Americans are showing disdain for capitalism. In fact, some recent polls show that young adults in America actually have a more favorable view of socialism than they do of capitalism.


 In July of 1939, a conference of medical professionals was held in Berlin, Germany. Participating were the professors and chairmen of the departments of psychiatry of the leading universities and medical schools of Germany, many of them, the most respected professionals in their fields. The subject? What would be the criteria for determining what patients would be considered to have “lives unworthy to be lived,” and what was the most “practical and cheap” manner of removing them from being burdens on the health-care system—by death. Source

#11 In Nazi Germany, the health care system was taken over by the government.

The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

Before Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.


Of course we all know what is going on in America today. The government spends nearly half of all health care dollars and Obamacare is going to mean more government control over the health care system than ever before.

Everything Hitler Did Was Legal

One of the weakest arguments for the legitimacy of abortion is that it is legal. Civil law does not determine morality. Rather, the law should reflect a morality that exists independently of the law. Can anyone seriously believe that abortion was immoral on January 21, 1973, and moral on January 23, 1973 Source

#12 Under Adolf Hitler, abortion was made “safe and legal” in Germany.

It turns out that Hitler was a huge fan of the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger. And as I wrote about recently, it was Sanger that once said the following….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”


Hitler echoed this sentiment when he wrote the following in Mein Kampf….

“The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring. . . represents the most humane act of mankind.”


After the Nazis came to power in 1933, abortion was very quickly legalized. By 1935 there were approximately 500,000 abortions being performed in Germany every single year.

Yes, Hitler very much encouraged Aryan women to have as many children as possible. But he also very much viewed abortion as a way to reduce “undesirable” populations.

Unfortunately, something very similar is happening today. Abortion clinics are often located in the “poor” part of town, and a staggering 72 percent of Planned Parenthood’s “customers” have incomes that are either equal to or beneath 150 percent of the federal poverty level.

Collection Bus for killing patients. wiki common

#13 In Nazi Germany, killing the “defective”, the “weak” and the “disabled” was considered to be a good thing because it made the German people “stronger”.

Unfortunately, many in America today have fully embraced the eugenics principles which were so dominant in Nazi Germany.

A 3 year old girl named Amelia was recently denied a kidney transplant because she is considered to be “mentally retarded”, and we all remember what happened to Terri Schiavo.

Not only that, the editorial page editor of the Detroit News recently proposed putting contraceptives into the drinking water in Michigan because the state has become a “breeding ground for poverty“.

This kind of sick thinking is rapidly spreading in America, and that is a very frightening thing.

#14 In Nazi Germany, education was nationalized and God was kicked out of the schools.

The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles, and had physical education.

Unfortunately, the exact same thing is happening to U.S. public schools.


#15 Under Adolf Hitler, God was mocked and religion was pushed out of every corner of public life.

Just check out the following information uncovered by author Bruce Walker….

The Nazi tract Gott und Volk was distributed in 1941, and it describes the life cycle of German youth in the future, who would: “With parties and gifts the youth will be led painlessly from one faith to the other and will grow up without ever having heard of the Sermon on the Mount or the Golden Rule, to say nothing of the Ten Commandments… The education of the youth is to be confined primarily by the teacher, the officer, and the leaders of the party. The priests will die out. They have estranged the youth from the Volk. Into their places will step the leaders. Not deputies of God. But anyway the best Germans. And how shall we train our children? Thus, as though they had never heard of Christianity!”

Once again, this parallels what we are seeing happen in America today. Last year, a high school student in Southern California was suspended for two days because he had private conversations with his classmates during which he discussed Christianity. He was also banned from bringing his Bible to school ever again.

For many more examples of this phenomenon, please see this article: “18 Examples Of How Christians Are Being Specifically Targeted By Big Brother“.

Eugenics and Race wiki commons
Stanley  Fischer in Southwest Africa was later used by Hitler in the Extermination. wiki commons

An illustration from Harper’s Weekly shows an alleged similarity between “Irish Iberian” and “Negro” features in contrast to the higher “Anglo-Teutonic.” wiki commons

#16 Adolf Hitler fully embraced the theory of evolution, and Darwinism provided the intellectual foundation for much of Nazism.

At a Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg in 1933, Hitler declared that “higher race subjects to itself a lower race . . .a right which we see in nature and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right“.

Hitler was obsessed with the “survival of the fittest” and he took this theory to its logical extremes. The following is how one author put it….

“Hitler was influenced above all by the theories of the nineteenth-century social Darwinist school, whose conception of man as biological material was bound up with impulses towards a planned society. He was convinced that the race was disintegrating, deteriorating through faulty breeding as a result of a liberally tinged promiscuity that was vitiating the nation’s blood. And this led to the establishment of a catalogue of ‘positive’ curative measures: racial hygiene, eugenic choice of marriage partners, the breeding of human beings by the methods of selection on the one hand and extirpation on the other”


But of course we have no problem with teaching this flawed theory to our children in the public schools of America today.

Haven’t we learned anything from history?

Hillary Clinton: ‘It takes a village to raise a child.’

#17 Under Adolf Hitler, the state started taking over the job of child care.

The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology.


Of course this is exactly what is happening in America today. Children are raised by day care centers and public schools, and most parents spend very little time with their own children.


Someone pissed in a jar of urine with a Crucifix and called it “art”. Someone else came along and smashed it with a hammer.

#18 In Nazi Germany, it became fashionable to mock Christians and the Christian faith.

The following is more from author Bruce Walker….

By 1935, the virulently anti-Christian leader of the Hitler Youth, Baldur von Shirach issued a regulation that prohibited any child from belonging simultaneously to a church youth group and the Hitler Youth, and gradually membership in the Hitler Youth became almost obligatory – parents were told that their children would not get jobs in the civil service unless they belonged to the Hitler Youth and employers were told not to hire children who did not belong to the Hitler Youth. Christian schoolchildren who did not belong to the Hitler Youth or its female counterpart were routinely beaten up by young Nazi thugs.
Boys inducted into the Hitler Youth were required to explicitly reject Christianity by oaths like this: “German blood and Christian baptismal water are completely incompatible.” At Hitler Youth center at Halle, was the following prominent statement: “The Faith fanatics, who still to-day slide down on their knees with faces uplifted to heaven, waste their time in churchgoing and prayers, and have not yet understood that they are living on the earth and that therefore their task is of a thoroughly earthly kind. All we Hitler people can still only look with the greatest contempt on those young people who still run to their silly Evangelical or Catholic Churches in order to vent their quite superstitious religious feelings.”


Those that believe that the Nazis embraced Christianity are delusional. The following are direct quotes out of Hitler Youth training manuals….

  • “Christianity is a religion of slaves and fools.”
  • “How did Christ die? Whining at the Cross!”
  • “The Ten Commandments represent the lowest instincts of man.”
  • “Christianity is merely a cloak for Judaism.”

This is definitely where things are going in America today. Our television shows and our movies regularly mock Christians and they are always portrayed as the “bad guys”.

In addition, the name of Jesus is rapidly becoming a forbidden word. Some U.S. courts have even ruled that it is unconstitutional to use the name of “Jesus Christ” during any official government meeting. The following comes from a recent WorldNetDaily article….

But the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are standing by their victory in a U.S. circuit court decision that states even “a solitary reference to Jesus Christ” in invocations before the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners’ meetings could do “violence to the pluralistic and inclusive values that are a defining feature of American public life.”

Lebensborn soon expanded to welcome non-German mothers. In a policy formed by Hitler in 1942, German soldiers were encouraged to fraternize with native women, with the understanding that any children they produced would be provided for. Racially fit women, most often the girlfriends or one-night stands of SS officers, were invited to Lebensborn homes to have their child in privacy and safety. Source

USA: Watch the video below. 

#19 Under Adolf Hitler, sexual promiscuity was actually encouraged.

The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn’t do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun no sports, and no political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.


Of course the exact same thing is happening in America today. If you doubt that your tax dollars are going to promote sexual promiscuity, then I have a video for you to watch. It is a video from the American Life League, and you can view it right here. DO NOT let any children watch this video. It is done by a pro-life organization but it is very graphic. I have posted a link to it because it is imperative that parents understand what is really going on out there. But please be warned that it is very, very graphic.

Things don’t go well when the socialists take away our guns.

First the Armenians in the army were disarmed, placed into labor battalions, and then killed. Next the Armenian political and intellectual leaders were rounded up on April 24, 1915, and then killed. Ditto for Ireland 1602 against Elizabeth I of England which was the beginning of the end, Russia, Germany, North Korea, Venezuela…they’re threatening to take the guns in the Ukraine…and also the USA…

#20 Once the Nazis took power, they rapidly implemented gun control legislation and later on they took all of the guns away from the populace.

Kitty Werthmann remembers very well what happened in Austria under the Nazis….

Next came gun registration. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.


Last year, more than 10 million guns were sold in the United States, but gun control legislation continues to become even more strict, and it is only a matter of time before the federal government tries to disarm the U.S. population completely.


#21 Under the Nazis, large numbers of children were taken away from good families.

The following is more from author Bruce Walker….

Parents who resisted Nazi anti-Christian indoctrination too strongly simply had their children taken away from them. The Nazis even forbade parents to give their children Christian names and ordered babies instead to be given names like Dietrich, Otto or Siegfried. The home teaching of Christianity by parents in the home was forbidden. Not content with simply driving Christianity out of public schools, Himmler banned all Confessing Church seminaries and instruction in 1937 and he closed all private religious schools two years later.


Doesn’t this sound exactly like where America is headed?

In many states, CPS (“child protective services”) has become one of the most feared government agencies. All over the nation, thousands upon thousands of children have been removed from good homes because the parents were not raising them “correctly”.

You can read about one particularly bad CPS horror story right here.

Police State

Firearms and Arrest Authority of Federal Agencies

#22 Under Adolf Hitler, society became very highly militarized.

Of course we are seeing the same thing in the U.S. right now.

Sadly, this is even happening to our public schools. According to blogger Alexander Higgins, students in kindergarten and the 1st grade in the state of New Jersey are now required by law to participate “in monthly anti-terrorism drills”. The following is an excerpt from a letter that he recently received from the school where his child attends….

Each month a school must conduct one fire drill and one security drill which may be a lockdown, bomb threat, evacuation, active shooter, or shelter-in place drill. All schools are now required by law to implement this procedure.


This is the kind of thing that a sicko like Adolf Hitler would try to do, and it is not good for our children.

Site is Sourcewatch – gives statistics… Source

#23 In Nazi Germany, the prisons were absolutely packed.

Right now, the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world by far and the largest total prison population on the entire globe by far.

Even children are being arrested in alarming numbers. In a previous article, I described how one 12-year-old girl down in Texas was recently arrested for spraying herself with perfume and how police were recently sent out to collect an overdue library book from a 5-year-old girl in Massachusetts.

Leonard Downie Jr., a former executive editor of The Washington Post, wrote the 30-page analysis entitled “The Obama Administration and the Press.” The report notes President Barack Obama came into office pledging an open, transparent government after criticizing the Bush administration’s secrecy, “but he has fallen short of his promise.”

“In the Obama administration’s Washington, government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press,” wrote Downie, now a journalism professor at Arizona State University. Source

#24 Under Adolf Hitler, there was basically no freedom of speech.

In the United States today we are told that we still have freedom of speech, but that freedom is being “chilled” in thousands of different ways.

For example, the FBI is now admittedly recording Internet talk radio programs all over the United States. The following comes from a recent article by Mark Weaver of….

If you call a radio talk show and get on the air, you might be recorded by the FBI.
The FBI has awarded a $524,927 contract to a Virginia company to record as much radio news and talk programming as it can find on the Internet.
The FBI says it is not playing big brother by policing the airwaves, but rather seeking access to what airs as potential evidence.


So please speak freely on talk radio. Just realize that the feds will be recording every single word.


This blogger supports life, traditional marriage, and the 2nd Amendment.

Supports all human life.

#25 Under Adolf Hitler, paranoia was standard operating procedure.

In Nazi Germany, every citizen was a potential threat and everyone had to be constantly watched for suspicious activity.

Of course the exact same thing is happening in America today. Just about anything you do can get you labeled as a “potential terrorist” by the government.

According to a new DHS report, the following are some of the beliefs and ideologies of potential terrorists….

  • “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
  • “anti-global”
  • “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
  • “reverent of individual liberty”
  • “believe in conspiracy theories”
  • “a belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack”
  • “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
  • “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
  • “insert religion into the political sphere”
  • “those who seek to politicize religion”
  • “supported political movements for autonomy”
  • “anti-abortion”
  • “anti-nuclear”

And the definition of “suspicious activity” has become so broad in America that it pretty much covers 100% of us. In 2012, the following activities are considered to be “suspicious” by the FBI….

  • shielding your computer screen from others
  • paying with cash
  • acting “nervous”
  • using multiple cell phones
  • requesting a specific room at a hotel
  • traveling with a large amount of luggage
  • refusing maid service at a hotel
  • staying in your room for too long
  • changing your appearance

In addition, the U.S. government has decided that it would be a really good idea for all of us to spy on one another. The “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign looks like it could have been pulled right out of a Gestapo security handbook.

But America is not supposed to be about spying on one another and reporting each other to the secret police.

America is supposed to be about liberty and freedom.

Recently, Fox News made a really bad decision by cancelling Freedom Watch. Judge Andrew Napolitano was one of the few voices on television that was still standing up for individual liberty.

As we think about how the Nazification of America has progressed, let the things that Judge Napolitano said on his last show echo in our minds. Video from that show is posted below….

<iframe width=”420″ height=”315″ src=”//” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe

The Video is Well Worth Watching!


One by one most of Karl Max’s goals in the Communist Manifesto either already have been achieved in the USA, or are on some political agenda to implement. Those goals are:

  • Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. (being implemented by many foreclosures by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac currently)
  • A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (achieved by XVI Amendment to the Constitution 1913)
  • Abolition of all rights of inheritance. (Planned by Obama’s Blueprint for Change)
  • Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
  • Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. (Obama’s nearly acheieved this by taking control of banks and student loans)
  • Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.(On Obama’s agenda)
  • Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. (Partially implemented by Obama)
  • Equal liability of all to work. (Partially planned by Obama Citizen Ccrps). etablishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
  • Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. (Largely implemented)
  • Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c. (Accomplished) source


According to Judge Napolitano (video in post below) only one third of the people of America were down for the revolution, one third supported the British, and one third were passive.


There are really only two theories of history. Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by anybody, or they happen because they are planned and somebody causes them to happen. War uses up expensive equipment gets blown up fast. So who benefits?

WWI: The Bank of England, private bank so the name was disingenuous, was founded in 1694 and from its founding to Napoleons defeat in Waterloo the country was at war for fifty six years and the rest of the time preparing for war. So the money changers whether they’re called the British Royal Adventurers (or called something similar) who caused Ireland such devastation, or the Honorable British (Dutch…) Indian Company(ies) who caused India, Africa, China and so many others so much devastation, were granted a Royal Charter in 1600 to one of her favorite families – the Cliffords/Russells and other aristocrats,  or the International Bankers, they’ve been sucking the world dry ever since.  Many work two jobs now to pay these crooks because a default our homes are gone - the government can take it with IRS might (or eminent domain for that matter)…

The US resisted pressure to open a Centrol Bank for decades - fast forward to the private and newly formed Federal Reserve Bank December 1913 when President Wilson signed the bill from Congress during Christmas when those who opposed it were home for the holiday. One can only imagine the champagne over the New Year. So it’s now 1914 and within a few months there’s a war – the first world war in the history of the world. Coincidence? There were imperialistic disputes between European countries on raw materials in Africa and Asia, Germany was eroding the lead, a Serbian problem with Austia and Hungary, but not even the media propagandists could get a war going until the assassination of the Duke and his wife. Convenient? The government and media hype justified an unnecessary war to the public.

Bottomline: The US now had a brand new private bank they disingenuously called the Federal Bank. England had theprivate Bank of England since 1694 therefore in deep financial trouble (they no longer had their East Indian cash cow), and Germany had opted out. They had to bring Germany back into the fold of the International Bankers so they had another war. And they’ve been doing it ever since around the globe. Today they’re in the Ukraine where they ousted a democratically elected president who refused to toe the line.

Note: President Kennedy understood the danger of private central banking. And he understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note which represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do. About four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas. The US notes were pulled from circulation, John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was on the investigative Warren Commission, and the rest is history.


Major General Smedley Butler on WAR -

A male in his military uniform; military ribbons are visible.

Major General Smedley D. Butler

His book, War is a Racket, denounces the workings of the military-industrial complex, the network of industrialists, financiers, and government officials who directly profit from war, a security state, and the industries that support this. It is a must read still today, as his logic and clarity offers deep insight into why our priorities are so stoutly centered around war and security. It is very, very lucrative for people in high places.

He writes:

WAR is a racket. It always has been

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

  • How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle?
  • How many of them dug a trench?
  • How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out?
  • How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets?
  • How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy?
  • How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

And what is this bill?

This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.”

See: Major General Smedley Butler – – The Military Industrial Complex’s Original Whistleblower

“The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.”- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946) 

Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit anymore. …We butchered the wrong pig.” -Winston Churchill (The Second World War – Bern, 1960)


“England has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve Banks and has re-lent it at high rates of interest to the Soviet Government… The Dnieperstory Dam was built with funds unlawfully taken from the United States Treasury by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks.” Rep. Louis T.McFadden (R-PA) 2

Even when Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union, Boris Yeltsin revealed that most of the foreign aid was ending up, we quote. “straight back into the coffers of western banks in debt service.” Rep. Louis T. McFadden. (and per McFadden – the US funded the Bolshevics).

“Banks do not have an obligation to promote the public good.” — Alexander Dielius, CEO, Germany, Austrian, Eastern Europe Goldman Sachs, 2010

“I am just a banker doing God’s work.” — Lloyd Blankfein, CEO, Goldman Sachs, 2000 source

Colonization and trade have been around since the ancient Greeks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Mass Civil Disobedience in New York Against ‘Safe Act’

Molon Labe: Gun control law a total failure

Paul Joseph Watson
April 17, 2014

The state of New York is refusing to say how many gun owners complied with a mandate to register their assault weapons under the Safe Act while a Sheriff says he will not enforce the measure, suggesting that just like a similar law in Connecticut, the gun control effort has been a total failure as Americans engage in mass civil disobedience against curbs on the Second Amendment.

Albany NYS “Safe Act” Protest – “We Will Not Comply”!

Owners of assault-style weapons had until Tuesday to register their weapons under the new law, but firearms advocates say they expect less than 10 per cent have complied, while, “The state refuses to say how many were registered, claiming it is confidential information protected by the law,” reports the Buffalo News.

Meanwhile, Erie County Sheriff Timothy B. Howard said he would not ask his deputies to enforce the new law, stating, “I don’t know. I am not encouraging them to do it. At the same time, their own consciences should be their guide. I am not forcing my conscience on them. That is a decision they should make.”

Protesters against the measure, labeled the “toughest” gun control law in the United States by Governor Andrew Cuomo, marked the deadline by shredding their registration cards during a demonstration in upstate New York on Tuesday, arguing that the law merely creates a new class of criminals out of responsible gun owners.

“They have been shredding the Constitution for years,” said Rus Thompson. “You shred the Constitution, we’ll shred any form you want us to fill out. They can’t arrest a million people. What are they going to do?”

A YouTube user by the name of Van Prepper posted a video showing him placing an anti-Safe Act sign outside his property wondering whether it will last one or two nights before it is defaced.

Meanwhile, Assembly Minority Leader Brian Kolb derided the Safe Act as “the worst piece of legislation I have seen in my 14 years as a member of the Assembly.”

This is a law that was created absent of any public input or participation. It has been costly. It has been confusing. And it has not made New York any safer than it was prior to its enactment. Bad legislation does not get better with age, and time will not make the SAFE Act acceptable to those whose constitutional rights have been compromised,” said Kolb.

A New York judge dismissed a last minute challenge to the law yesterday, ruling that it was not unconstitutional.

Mass disobedience against gun control in New York state mirrors what happened in Connecticut earlier this year, where residents were required by law to register high capacity magazines and assault rifles manufactured after 1994.

Just over 50,000 assault weapons were registered after the law came into effect, despite the fact that there are at least 370,000 assault rifles in the hands of Connecticut gun owners, meaning that just 13% of assault rifles were registered.

Obioiusly their “safe act” scam isnt to make the people safe. It’s to make the Government safe for them to apply more tyranny – iow – gun control isn’t about guns – it’s about control. The Bundy Ranch is a prime example of what could have been. As it is they lost many cattle, especially since it’s calving season – they also lost their water infrastructure from the destruction by the BLM.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

IRS Demands Donor List from Rand Paul’s Nonprofit Campaign for Liberty

By Joel Gehrke | APRIL 15, 2014

Photo - Former Congressman Ron Paul gestures during a rally for Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli in Richmond, Va., Monday, Nov. 4, 2013. (AP Photo/Steve Helber) Former Congressman Ron Paul gestures during a rally for Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken…

Ron Paul‘s nonprofit Campaign for Liberty will fight the Internal Revenue Service’s demand that it reveal its donor list to the agency, despite having already been fined for refusing to do so.

“There is no legitimate reason for the IRS to know who donates to Campaign for Liberty,” Megan Stiles, the communications director at Campaign for Liberty, told the Washington Examiner in an email on Tuesday. “We believe the First Amendment is on our side as evidenced by cases such as NAACP v. Alabama and International Union UAW v. National Right to Work. Many 501(c)(4) organizations protect the privacy of their donors in the very same way as Campaign for Liberty. For some reason the IRS has now chosen to single out Campaign for Liberty for special attention. We plan to fight this all the way.”

Ron Paul suggested that the group will refuse to pay the IRS fine in an fundraising email to supporters about the agency’s request for information.

“Paying this outrageous extortionist fine — just to exercise our rights as American citizens to petition our government — may even be cheaper in the short run,” he wrote. “But it’ll just embolden an alphabet soup of other federal agencies to come after us.” Paul’s email said that the rule requiring that 501(c)(4)s list their donors is “rarely enforced.”

Stiles accused the IRS of trying to silence her organization. “The IRS technically requires donor information from 501(c)(4) organizations and is forbidden by law from releasing it to the public, yet despite this they have ‘mistakenly’ released the information repeatedly over the years,” she wrote. “Often these leaks have been made to political opponents of the conservative groups whose information was leaked. Leaking the donor information is intended to harass and to intimidate those donors from donating to political causes. Campaign for Liberty has refused to provide donor information to the IRS to protect the privacy of our members. Now the IRS has demanded the information and fined Campaign for Liberty for protecting its members’ privacy.”

Web URL:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bloomberg Attempts Fresh Start With New Gun Control Group

Comes months after MAIG gun confiscation agenda exposed

Adan Salazar
April 16, 2014

Gun rights activists who’ve fought back against former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s repeated efforts to infringe on the Second Amendment can revel in a mild victory.

Photo by bkabak, via Flickr

Today the billionaire announced he would invest $50 million merging his embattled Mayors Against Illegal Guns group with his other anti-Second Amendment venture, Mothers Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, to form a more inclusive “Everytown for Gun Safety.”


“This is not a battle of dollars, this is a battle for the hearts and minds of America so that we can protect our children, protect innocent people,” Bloomberg told NBC’s Today show, sounding similar to Attorney General Eric Holder when he said the government needs to “brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

In the months leading up to the disbandment of MAIG, the group had earned itself a notably dirty reputation due to its consistent efforts to undermine the Bill of Rights and its recruitment of an assortment of criminal mayors. Of course, it didn’t help that their Director Mark Glaze was also issuing bold lies on national television.

In February, Infowars reported on former-MAIG member John Tkazyik’s damning OpEd claiming Bloomberg’s group was a front for a wider gun confiscation agenda.

“Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens,” Tkazyik said, confirming what many already suspected about the group. “Nearly 50 pro-Second Amendment mayors have left the organization. They left for the same reason I did,” he also added. Days later, three New York mayors scuttled to the group’s defense.

Just this month the mayor of Danbury, Conn., Mark Boughton, also jumped the MAIG ship for fear his constituents would vote him out of office. Earlier this year, Connecticut witnessed a massive revolt from gun owners who refused to register their weapons after the state passed a mandatory registration law targeting assault weapons and “high-capacity” magazines.

The Mayors group was also instrumental in influencing New York state politicians to hurriedly pass the unconstitutional SAFE Act, which at one time contained Democrat proposals for outright gun confiscation. Within five days of the shooting at Sandy Hook, the group was already urging President Obama to take action against the Second Amendment, and even presented him a list of anti-gun suggestions.

As we reported today, thousands of law-abiding New York gun owners are also refusing to register their weapons and are calling on everyone to revolt against the SAFE Act’s ridiculous registration mandate, which essentially redefines most semi-automatic weapons, guns with detachable magazines, a telescoping stock, or long guns with a pistol grip as “assault weapons.”

The formation of “Everytown” should have been long expected. Months prior to disbanding MAIG, the membership roster, which identified mayors across the country who support gun control, was deleted from the MAIG web page. The roster is still available on the Internet Archive, however.

Indeed, the slate is now clean for Bloomberg to wage yet another propaganda “battle” against the minds of the American people. Time will only tell if this effort will be another spectacular fail as his others have been. Source


NAZI = National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.

Gun control? It’s not about guns it’s about control.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Cliven Bundy to sheriffs: ‘Disarm’ the Bureau of Land Management

 Cliven Bundy is pictured. | Getty

By TAL KOPAN | 4/14/14 12:40 PM EDT

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy said Monday that his standoff with the feds isn’t just about cattle: It’s about an “overpowering” bureaucracy in the U.S. that needs to be disarmed.

“I only want to talk to one person in each county across the United States, and here’s what I want to say:

  • County sheriffs, disarm U.S. bureaucracy.
  • County sheriffs, disarm U.S. bureaucrats,”

Bundy said on Glenn Beck’s radio show on TheBlaze on Monday.

On Saturday, the Bureau of Land Management released Bundy’s cattle back to him after rounding it up on federal land over what they say are unpaid grazing fees.

(PHOTOS: Politicians with guns)

The release ended a tense standoff between BLM and protesters including Bundy’s supporters, some of whom were reportedly armed.

“My Clark County sheriff, Doug Gillespie, didn’t finish his job,” Bundy said. “What the mandate from we the people was, Saturday was to disarm the park service and BLM. And when he didn’t do that, and his time was up, then we the people took it into our hands and had to do the sheriff’s job and the governor of Nevada’s job.”

Bundy said his supporters marched “and they faced an army of bureaucrats, and they faced those guns with courage and faith and much danger, and they backed those bureaucrats down and they run out of this county into Utah.”

Beck pushed on Bundy as to whether his armed supporters justified the response from the feds, but also questioned whether something more was at play than grazing fees.

“All I know is … I feel like it’s evidently time to disarm this bureaucracy,” Bundy said. “They’re overpowering us with guns, and this is a prime example. They’re ruling with unlimited power over we the people, and we the people, we can’t stand it no longer. We’ve got to do something. So this seems to be sort of a mandate for we the people.”

Bundy did not go into specifics about how sheriffs or people should “disarm” federal regulators, but he said he disputes that the land in question is federal land. He claims the land belongs to the state of Nevada.

He said it is up to county sheriffs to enforce the people’s constitutional rights in cases like his.

Read more:

Good point. Why use BLM militarized federal agents (contractors/mercenaries), snipers, helicopters with armed agents,and ban net access, just to herd a few cattle especially since it’s a state issue. The sheriff there is on the board of the ACLU, and the DHS so he’s obviously a Harry boy. Most of these federal agencies have no need to be armed let alone with militarized weaponry just as they’ve no need to get involved with states rights. The government is slowly getting rid of the National Guards – some states have included them in their state budgets in order to keep the feds out of their hair.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

USPS Stocks Up On Guns and Ammo: “It Doesn’t Make a Whole Lot of Sense”

Mac Slavo
April 16, 2014

Going postal just took on a whole new meaning.

Image: USPS (Wiki Commons).

Earlier this year Kit Daniels reported that the U.S. Postal Service is joining other alphabet federal agencies in stocking up on ammunition and firearms. It’s an alarming trend that has swept the nation over the last several years and one that Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Washington-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, calls “highly unusual.”

Conspiracy theories abound over the stockpiling of some two billion rounds of ammunition to date, leaving many wondering what the US government has in store for the American people.

Just last week, in the wake of the most recent Fort Hood shooting, mainstream media issued a report claiming that shooter Ivan Lopez was stockpiling weapons and ammo, when in fact he had purchased a single firearm and perhaps a few hundred rounds for it over a couple of visits to the gun store.

If his meager purchases are supposed to raise concerns with the American public and instill a sense of fear, then should we not be absolutely terrified of what our government is doing?

Earlier this year, the USPS posted a notice on its website, under the heading “Assorted Small Arms Ammunition,” that says: “The United States Postal Service intends to solicit proposals for assorted small arms ammunition. If your organization wishes to participate, you must pre-register. This message is only a notification of our intent to solicit proposals.”

Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Washington-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said: “We’re seeing a highly unusual amount of ammunition being bought by the federal agencies over a fairly short period of time. To be honest, I don’t understand why the federal government is buying so much at this time.”

A little more than a year ago, the Social Security Administration put in a request for 174,000 rounds of “.357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow-point” bullets.

Before that, it was the Department of Agriculture requesting 320,000 rounds. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security raised eyebrows with its request for 450 million rounds — at about the same time the FBI separately sought 100 million hollow-point rounds.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also requested 46,000 rounds.

Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, asked: why exactly does a weather service need ammunition?

“I don’t believe in conspiracy theories, but it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense,” Gottlieb said. “The amount of ammunition they’re buying up far exceeds their needs. It far exceeds what they’ll use — they’ll never use it all.“

(Newsmax via Steve Quayle)

It certainly doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. If you, as an individual, were to purchase a thousand rounds of bulk ammunition you’d be flagged, according to Senator Rand Paul, as a domestic terrorist.

Know good and well that some day there could be a government in power that is shipping its citizens off for disagreements. There are laws on the books now that characterize who might be a terrorist.

Someone who has guns, someone who has ammunition that is weatherproofed, someone who has more than seven days of food in their house can be considered a potential terrorist.

Perhaps what the government is afraid of and what they are preparing for… is us.

They may have bugged out of Bunkerville, NV last weekend, but you can rest assured that they are licking their wounds and reorganizing. They no doubt learned a lot during this incident, and they will be fully prepared for the next one, likely with military personnel and stockpiles of ammunition in tow.

While we’d like to agree with the notion that the government will “never use it all,” all signs suggest that they are building these reserves in the event that they do, in fact, need to use them.

It’s apparent that elements within the U.S. government foresee a set of events in the near future that will require them to raise up arms against the American people. If this is the case, then the stockpiling of two billion rounds of ammunition, firearms, tactical gear, and coffins across federal agencies that all have specific guidelines set out for “national emergencies” and martial law scenarios makes perfect sense.

They are planning for something big and they are doing so at an accelerated pace.

Posting information is not a conspiracy theory as the US funded Corporate Media and their NGO’s claim. Just full disclosure excercising the right to free speech and history.

See: Firearms and Arrest Authority of Federal Agencies

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Firearms and Arrest Authority of Federal Agencies

dated August 02, 2012

US Capitol Police officer guards Capitol Building after Phoenix, AZ shooting

US Capitol Police officer guards Capitol Building after Phoenix, AZ shooting – Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

More than a few eyebrows were raised when the U.S. Department of Education purchased 27 police-grade shotguns. However, the Department of Education is just one of 73 federal government agencies employing full-time law enforcement officers who are authorized to carry firearms and make arrests in the United States.

Brief Overview

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ latest (2008) Census of Federal Law Enforcement Officers, the combined federal government agencies employ about 120,000 full-time law enforcement officers who are authorized to carry firearms and make arrests. That is roughly the equivalent of 40 officers per 100,000 U.S. residents. By comparison, there is one member of the U.S. Congress per 700,000 residents.

Federal Law Enforcement Officers are authorized by law to perform four specific functions:

  • conduct criminal investigations,
  • execute search warrants,
  • make arrests, and
  • carry firearms.

From 2004 to 2008, the number of federal law enforcement officers with arrest and firearms authority grew by 14%, or about 15,000 officers. The federal agencies also employ nearly 1,600 officers in the U.S. territories, primarily in Puerto Rico.

The Census of Federal Law Enforcement Officers does not include data on officers in the

  • U.S. Armed Forces, or the
  • Central Intelligence Agency and the
  • Transportation Security Administration’s Federal Air Marshals Service, due to national security restrictions.

The number of Federal Law Enforcement Officers has increased rapidly in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Since the 9/11/2001 attacks the ranks of Federal Law Enforcement Officers grew from about 88,000 in 2000, to about 120,000 in 2008.

Front Line Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Excluding 33 Offices of Inspectors General, 24 federal agencies each employed more than 250 full-time personnel with firearm and arrest authority in 2008. Indeed, law enforcement is the main function of most of these agencies. Few people would be surprised to see field agents of the Border Patrol, FBI, U.S. Marshals Service or the Secret Service carrying guns and making arrests. The complete list includes:

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection (36,863 officers)
  • Federal Bureau of Prisons (16,835)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (12,760)
  • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (12,446)
  • U.S. Secret Service (5,213)
  • Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (4,696)
  • Drug Enforcement Administration (4,308)
  • U.S. Marshals Service (3,313)
  • Veterans Health Administration (3,128)
  • Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (2,636)
  • Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (2,541)
  • U.S. Postal Inspection Service (2,288)
  • U.S. Capitol Police (1,637)
  • National Park Service – Rangers (1,404)
  • Bureau of Diplomatic Security (1,049)
  • Pentagon Force Protection Agency (725)
  • U.S. Forest Service (644)
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (598)
  • National Park Service – U.S. Park Police (547)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration (363)
  • U.S. Mint Police (316)
  • Amtrak Police (305)
  • Bureau of Indian Affairs (277)
  • Bureau of Land Management (255)

From 2004 to 2008, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) added more than 9,000 officers, the largest increase at any federal agency. A majority of the CBP increase occurred in the Border Patrol, which added more than 6,400 officers during the 4-year period.

Officers of the Veterans Health Administration need arrest and firearms authority because they provide law enforcement and protective services for over 150 VA medical centers located nationwide.

At the Cabinet department level, component agencies of the

Within the legislative branch, the U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) employed 1,637 officers to provide police services for the U.S. Capitol grounds and buildings. With full law enforcement authority in the area immediately surrounding the Capitol complex, the USCP is the largest federal law enforcement agency operating wholly within the nation’s capital.

The largest employer of federal officers outside of the executive branch was the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AOUSC). The AOUSC employed 4,696 probation officers with arrest and firearm authority in its Federal Corrections and Supervision Division in 2008.

The Not-So-Obvious Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

In 2008, another 16 federal agencies not so typically associated with police powers employed fewer than 250 full-time personnel with firearm and arrest authority. These included:

* The Library of Congress Police ceased operation in 2009, when its duties were assumed by the U.S. Capitol Police.

Most of the officers employed by these agencies are assigned to provide security and protective services at the agency’s buildings and grounds. Officers employed by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors provide security and protective services only at the Board’s Washington, D.C. headquarters. Officers serving at the various Federal Reserve banks and braches are hired by the individual banks and were not counted in the Census of Federal Law Enforcement Officers.

And the Inspectors General

Finally, 33 of the 69 federal Offices of Inspectors General (OIG), including the Department of Education’s OIG, employed a total of 3,501 criminal investigators with firearms and arrest authority in 2008. These 33 Offices of Inspectors General represent all 15 Cabinet-level departments, as well as 18 other federal agencies, boards and commissions.

Also See: Obama’s Missing Inspectors Generals

Among other duties, officers of the Offices of Inspectors General often investigate cases of improper, wasteful or illegal activities, including theft, fraud and wrongful use of public funds.

Also See: Outrageous Examples of Government Waste, Fraud and Abuse

For example, OIG officers recently investigated the General Services Administration’s outrageous $800,000 “team building” meeting in Las Vegas, and a series of scams being perpetrated against Social Security recipients.

Are These Officers Trained?

Along with training they may have received in the military or other law enforcement agencies, most federal law enforcement officers are required to complete training at one of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) facilities.

In addition to training in basic to advanced law enforcement, criminology and tactical driving, FLETC’s Firearms Division provides intensive training in the safe handling and justifiable use of firearms.


Obama’s Personal Army

“Because the American military swears an allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, and not to the President, could Obama’s strategy be to strip our Armed Services and shift their dollars into an all powerful civilian Army under his command? Two tips coming into CiR this week surprisingly connect just these dots and link these machinations to Obamacare funding.”

“A long time FEMA source cites this sentence in the Obama Army speech: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.” This tipster told CiR that when Obama took office, older, long time FEMA employees and/or individual assistance personnel were in the process of being replaced by “18 to 24 year olds who knew next to nothing” about homeland security or emergency response. These young people and FEMA operations were pulled into Washington, D.C. under the executive branch’s prerogative.”

Bundy Ranch – FYI to Obama – this whole country’s a free speech zone!

All dictators need their own army! These militarized cops are working for the government not us. No surprises that many of these militarized cops were brain-washed into viewing us as the enemy. So when we see the multiplying of armored military vehicles, increase in police using military weapons, the purchase of billions of bullets by the DHS, it’s certainly not for our safety or protection. It’s to implement the UN aka International Globalists decrees. These International Globalists were around with their money and power before and after Hitler’s introduction/paid propaganda to the German people…(reminds me of the Obama super-produced, carefully manipulated, Greek column inauguration pageant in 2008…when silly people were fainting all over the place.)

Hitler posing in Nuremberg with SA members in the late 1920s. Julius Streicher is to Hitler’s right, and Hermann Göring stands bedecked with medals beneath Hitler.

Read “the Night of the Long Knives” and you will see the plan that Obama has for us.

blm 4






The People vs Government at Bundy Ranch

Today is just another chapter, another time, another method, same people, same results.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Airing Harry Reid’s Dirty Laundry

Reid ~ ‘We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it.’

Reid ~ ‘It’s Not Over.’

A Western Journalism Exclusive By Steve Baldwin

Senator Harry Reid claims to be an ethical politician and he often employs his Mormon religion in order to demonstrate his alleged immaculacy. However, the reality is that he is, in fact, one of the most ethically challenged politicians in office today. This report will review his alliances with corrupt individuals, his support of ACORN, his ties with organized crime figures and his chronic failure to comply with campaign finance laws.

Harry Reid’s Alliance with Jack Abramoff

Soon after the Jack Abramoff scandal broke, Reid took the lead in attacking Republicans for fostering a “culture of corruption.” (1)

But shortly after making these comments, it was reported that Reid took almost $68,000 from Abramoff’s firm, its PAC and its Indian casino clients. (2)

Reid then tried to distance himself from Abramoff, stating, “[D]on’t lump me in with Jack Abramoff. This is a Republican scandal. Don’t try to give any of it to me.” (3)

Here’s the key passage:

Harry Reid wrote at least four letters helpful in Indian tribes represented by Jack Abramoff, and Reid’s staff had frequent contact with the disgraced lobbyist’s team about legislation….Reid collected nearly $68,000 in political donations from Abramoff’s firm, lobbying partners and clients…Abramoff’s firm also hired one of Reid’s top legislative aides as a lobbyist. (4)

The bulk of the donation money came from Indian tribes who were Abramoff’s clients, most of whom owned casinos in the region. Reid’s letters were meant to influence the Interior Department to reject applications that would allow certain Indian tribes to open up new casinos. Reid was not acting in opposition to gambling, but was rather protecting the existing Indian casinos (Abramoff’s Clients) from having new competition in their regions. (5)

Reid Protects ACORN from Investigation

There is little doubt that ACORN is used by the Democrat party to fabricate voters and register illegal aliens in order to benefit their politicians. What’s more, there is little doubt that ACORN efforts benefited Reid’s campaigns.

The Las Vegas Review Journal reported that the Las Vegas office of ACORN has been engaged in massive fraud. At least 48% of the registrations turned in by ACORN are fraudulent.

Indeed, it was so obvious that the ACORN Las Vegas office was raided by authorities. They found that 59 inmates from a work-release program at a nearby prison were employed by ACORN and found numerous irregularities. Its field director, Christopher Edwards, pled guilty to two gross misdemeanor counts of conspiracy.

Despite these findings, when the US Senate voted 83-7 to block ACORN from bidding for additional federal grant money, Reid refused to hold a hearing on ACORN’s activities. Even after the scandal broke revealing that ACORN was assisting an underage prostitution operation, Reid claimed such an investigation of ACORN by Congress might distract attention from more important issues. (6)

Another publication reported that Reid wrote Senator Vitter to inform him that his call for an ACORN investigation was driven by his political bias!

In his letter to Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), the majority leader said he would rather not “ask our committees or this Congress to do anything that would detract from efforts” to address bigger priorities, including healthcare reform and economic recovery. He also expressed his concern that Vitter’s “interest in this matter is driven, at least in part, by partisan political views.” (7)

Perhaps Reid’s attitude here is due to the fact that the group which seems to be running ACORN, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), contributed nearly $50,000 to Reid’s campaign committee and leadership PAC. (8)

Reid’s Relationship with George Soros

George Soros is a foreign-born billionaire who is the single largest funder of many Anti-American groups:, Democracy Alliance, Media Matters, Health Care for America Now, Center for American Progress, and Campaign for America’s Future, just to name a few. Soros wants to destroy the principles America was founded upon and turn it into a “socialist paradise.”

Soros is a convicted inside trader who supports open borders, gay rights, abortion rights, increased union power and is hostile to the free enterprise system, even though he made billions off of it. He made his money in a very unethical and, many believe, illegal way – international currency speculation and manipulation. Some believe his fortune was made from drug smuggling since his empire is based offshore in the Netherlands Antilles; the CIA describes this location as “a transshipment point for South American drugs bound for the US and Europe; money–laundering center.” (9)

But Soros’s shady background did not dissuade Reid from taking money from him. Since becoming the Senate Minority leader in 2005 and then the Majority leader in 2007, Reid has had operational control of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. While fundraising for the DSCC, Reid took over $220,000 from Soros, the Soros Fund Management, and various Soros family members. (10)

Reid Violated Federal Election Law by Using Campaign Funds for Christmas Bonuses

In 2006, it was reported that Reid paid Christmas bonuses to staff at the luxurious Ritz Carlton where he lived, using campaign funds. Federal Election law prohibits candidates from using campaign funds for such activity. (11)

Reid Uses his Office to Financially Benefit his Sons

Harry Reid has four sons who all work for Nevada’s largest law firm, Lionel, Sawyer & Collins. All of them have benefited from Reid.

Here’s how the Los Angeles Times puts it:

But Harry Reid is in a class by himself. One of his sons and his son-in-law lobby in Washington for companies, trade groups and municipalities seeking Reid’s help in the Senate. A second son has lobbied in Nevada for some of those same interests, and a third has represented a couple of them as a litigator.

In the last four years alone, their firms have collected more than $2 million in lobbying fees from special interests that were represented by the kids and helped by the senator in Washington.

Apparently such activities are not illegal. They should be. They are certainly unethical. The article details half a dozen examples of specific legislation pushed by Reid which benefited his sons. (12)

The Coyote Springs Land Deal

Reid accepted donations from a key Chinagate fundraiser: John Huang.Huang was responsible for arranging illegal contributions for the Clintons; in return their administration signed off on hi-tech exports that helped China upgrade its weapons systems.

Indeed, part of it was originally intended for target practice for a defense contractor, part of it was a habitat for the endangered desert tortoise, part of it was for a power line right of way, and much of the property contained a fragile system of streams important to the local ecosystem.

But Whittemore was also a large donor to Reid. Whittemore and his family gave over $50,000 to Reid and his leadership fund over the last decade. Reid’s sons also received contributions for their campaigns. (13)

So they obviously came to an agreement: Whittemore poured money into Reid’s campaigns and Reid cleared the obstacles, allowing Whittemore to develop land for housing that was previously thought impossible to develop.

Reid inserted language in a land management bill that reallocated the power line corridor.

Regarding the tortoise issue, he persuaded the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to swap that part of the property for land adjacent to the property.

Then he persuaded the EPA to lesson their opposition to the project on grounds that it impacted the ecosystem of the area.

The Los Angeles Times covered the story:

Yet the valley – an hour northeast of Las Vegas – is on its way to becoming a real estate development of historic proportions, with as many as 159,000 homes, 16 golf courses and a full complement of stores and service facilities. At nearly 43,000 acres, Coyote Springs covers almost twice as much space as the next-largest development in a state famous for outsized building projects.

Helping make Coyote Springs come alive was an alliance between a multimillionaire developer and one of the highest-ranking members of Congress: Nevada Democrat Harry Reid, the Senate minority leader and a member of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee.

The relationship between developers such as Harvey Whittemore and politicians such as Reid is especially close in Nevada, home to a small fraternity of movers and shakers, powerful demands of rapid population growth and a huge amount of federally owned land.

Over the last four years, Reid has used his influence in Washington to help the developer, Nevada super-lobbyist Whittemore, clear obstacles from Coyote Springs’ path. At one point, Reid proposed opening the way for Whittemore to develop part of the site for free – something for which the developer later agreed to pay the government $10 million. As the project advanced, Reid received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Whittemore. The contributions not only went to Reid’s Senate campaigns, but also to his leadership fund, which he used to help bankroll the campaigns of Democratic colleagues. (14)

Reid Collects $1.1 Million Windfall on Property he didn’t Own

In 2006, it was reported by the Associated Press that he collected $1.1 Million on land he hadn’t owned in three years. As the AP reports:

Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn’t personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In the process, Reid did not disclose to Congress an earlier sale in which he transferred his land to a company created by a friend and took a financial stake in that company, according to records and interviews.

The Nevada Democrat’s deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations. ….In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn’t disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown’s company. (15)

The Del Webb Land Swap

A corporation called Del Webb wanted to acquire and develop 4,700 acres of prime federal land outside of Las Vegas. In order to make this transaction work, Del Webb wanted to use a federal program that swaps federal land for private land that is supposed to be environmentally sensitive. However, the land being offered by Del Webb for the swap was inferior land and not even close to the value of the federal land that he desired. Thus, the taxpayers would take a loss with such a swap.

There were also a lot of other obstacles and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) opposed it for numerous reasons. Once again, Reid intervened with Federal agencies to make it happen; and once again, Reid’s campaign received over $50,000 from Del Webb for his efforts.

Indeed, Del Webb hosted a fund-raiser for Reid at its Phoenix headquarters. As Human Events reported:

In the early 1990s a helpless corporation, Del Webb, wanted to realize its personal dream and develop some land outside Las Vegas. There was just one problem: the government owned much of it and it wasn’t for sale! Employing the simple Reid Estate wealth building system, Del Webb hired a former Reid aide, donated $18,000 to Harry Reid’s campaign fund and then did the obvious next thing: it purchased “environmentally sensitive” lands 400 miles away near Lake Tahoe. After two letters to the Interior Department from Sen. Reid and a personal meeting organized by him, at which a government employee said he felt “pressured” by Reid, the Interior Department allowed Del Webb and its partners to swap that environmentally valuable land near Lake Tahoe for the environmentally worthless (but commercially valuable) land in Las Vegas. Reid claims to have done nothing unusual. (16)

Harry Reid Tied to Chinagate Figure


Reid accepted donations from a key Chinagate fundraiser: John Huang. Huang was responsible for arranging illegal contributions for the Clintons; in return their administration signed off on hi-tech exports that helped China upgrade its weapons systems. Reid then later pushed for the Senate confirmation of the judge who let Huang off with just a “slap on the wrist.”
As NewsMax reports:

In June 1999, Huang’s case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard Paez, who had six months earlier been nominated to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by President Clinton. Critics says the assignment presented a massive conflict of interest for Judge Paez, a concern fueled by the sentence he meted out to the Clinton donor in Aug. 1999.

Sen. Reid’s former donor received a mere $10,000 fine, 500 hours of community service and one year probation. When Paez’s 9th Circuit nomination came up for Senate confirmation, Republicans cried foul. Sen. Jeff Sessions complained that Paez had violated Justice Department sentencing guidelines that required Huang to serve jail time, calling the plea bargain “a dangerous agreement” and “a debasement of justice.”

But Sen. Reid went to bat for Huang’s judge, after being asked to reach out to other Mormon Senators by Mrs. Paez, a fellow Mormon. “That’s what I did,” Reid told the New York Times. (17)

Reid Accepted Free Boxing Tickets while a Related Bill was Pending

The AP first reported this ethical lapse:

Senate Democratic Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) accepted free ringside tickets from the Nevada Athletic Commissionto three professional boxing matches while that state agency was trying to influence him on federal regulation of boxing. Reid took the free seats for Las Vegas fights between 2003 and 2005 as he was pressing legislation to increase government oversight of the sport, including the creation of a federal boxing commission that Nevada’s agency feared might usurp its authority. (18)

Reid – A First Class Porker

In 2009 alone, Harry Reid requested money for pork projects that ended up costing taxpayers $229,773,429. Reid was responsible for diverting taxpayer money to all kinds of projects that should have never been the responsibility of the Federal Government. A few examples include:

  • Local transportation projects
  • Private research institutes
  • Research on water
  • Research on job training
  • Lake Tahoe bus facilities
  • University projects
  • Boys Town
  • Railroad projects
  • Economic development projects for the town of Wells
  • Copper wire theft protection programs for Las Vegas
  • Lighting demonstration projects
  • Wastewater improvements for city of Henderson
  • Water treatment for city of Goldfield
  • School counseling projects for Las Vegas schools
  • Arts center for Las Vegas


071009-reid-earmark2 While many of these projects may have merit, they should be funded at the city, county or state level. Forcing taxpayers nationwide to fund projects in Las Vegasor for sewage improvement for Goldfield is outrageous. (19) These projects alone were just in 2009!

One project Reid obtained $54 million for was for a “Magnetic Levitation Train.” The train would go from Disney Land to Las Vegas, but the project was opposed by the Department of Transportation. Nonetheless, numerous companies and individuals tied to this project gave Reid a total of $28,749.

One taxpayer group denounced the project as:

“[A] train to nowhere….We’re wasting tens of millions of dollars on a project nobody believes will be built except Harry Reid.” (20)

As Business Week Writes:

But Reid has pressed ahead, earmarking $9 million between 2000 and 2004 and winning a $45 million authorization in last year’s federal transportation bill. It’s just one small example of how congressional leaders can keep projects alive and how difficult it will be for reformers to stamp out earmarks — the hidden pots of cash that lawmakers tuck into spending bills for favorite projects or constituents. (21)

Reid’s love of pork knows no limits—most of the time it ends up benefiting him in some way or another. One earmark funded a bridge that was to be built in Laughlin, Nevada. The bridge would increase the value of all the property in that area, but what Reid played down, however, was the fact that he owned 160 acres of the land where the bridge was to be built. (22)

Reid even diverted money from the 2009 Defense Budget appropriation bill. So instead of defense funding going to our soldiers to help fight terrorism, Reid diverted this money to projects such as a Reno fire station, a “renewable energy” plant for the National Guard, and ammo “recycling.” (23)

Incredibly, when Reid first became Senate Minority Leader, he vowed to reform earmark abuse. Since then, not only has he failed to reform the abuse, he has become one of the biggest earmark abusers in the Senate.

Reid’s Positions On Issues

Overall Ratings

Some believe Reid is a moderate, but there’s really nothing to substantiate that, except for perhaps his stance on the issue of gun control. Regardless, his most recent ratings are fairly liberal:

His ACU ratings have ranged from 26 in 2003 to 0 in 2007, but since 2002, the average has been 12. His ACLU rating is 44; his ADA rating is a perfect 100; his League of Conservation Voters and NARAL ratings are also perfect 100s; and his pro-Union vote, according to SEIU, is 92.

In other words, he’s hard left on abortion, environment, and union issues. Some commentators have tried to claim that Reid is pro-life because he says he is “personally” opposed to abortion. Well, so is Ted Kennedy and the fact of the matter is that Reid has perfect ratings with all pro-abortion groups.

Gun Control

Even concerning gun control, much has been made of the fact that Reid is allegedly conservative on that issue. However, that’s not totally accurate.

While the NRA gave him a “B” in 2004, Gun Owners of America gave Reid an “F” four out of the last six years. Moreover, the Coalition to Stop Handgun Violence gave him a perfect 100 in 2000 and the Brady Gun Control Group gave him a 71 in 2003. Indeed, just within the last year Reid supported these anti-gun actions:

* Voted for the Stimulus Bill which contained anti-gun language

* Voted for legislation that expanded the amount of land covered by the national parks gun ban.

* Voted to confirm Attorney General Eric Holder who doesn’t believe the 2nd Amendment is an individual right.

* Voted to confirm dozens of other anti-gun appointees, including the Sotomayor nomination

to the US Supreme Court, even though she wrote an opinion that the 2nd amendment did not apply to the states.

* Voted to block legislation to repeal the unconstitutional gun ban in the District of Columbia

Homosexual Issues

On Homosexual issues, Reid told gay rights activists that he opposes his own church’s views on homosexual marriage. He actually criticized the LDS church for backing Prop. 8, the measure which banned same-sex marriage in California.

Reid also signed a letter supporting an anti-Prop 8 march. (24)

But this shouldn’t be surprising since Reid has always voted for gay rights legislation and has received funding from the leading homosexual PAC, the Human Rights Campaign. (25)

War on Terrorism

On foreign policy issues, Reid appears to be clueless. He called for the United States to pull out of Iraq and then laughed about the consequences of doing so. As most experts say, a pull out of our troops would lead to total chaos and ethnic cleaning on an unprecedented level. (26)

Reid also said the surge would not work in Iraq before it even had a chance to work—There’s little doubt such rhetoric demoralized our troops. (27)

Health Care

On Health care, Reid obviously supports socialized health care and has called opponents to Obama’s health care plan “evil mongers.” (28)

Indeed, Reid parroted fabricated facts given to him by the Soros-funded, pro-socialist medicine group “Health Care for America Now.” He claimed that profits for health insurance companies rose 450% since 2000:

There is no business in America that makes more money than the insurance industry – over the last 10 years their profits have increased by 450 percent. (29)

But, according to numerous studies, the average profit margin for health care insurance groups has been 3 to 3.5 % annually, a figure that is less than many industries. (30)

Social Security

According to Reid: “Social Security is the most successful program in the history of the world,” even though it is headed toward collapse. (31)

Ironically, Reid, as a member of Congress, introduced a bill that would allow members of congress to opt out of social security. (32)


One of the most shocking statements made by Reid is his claim on a television talk show that the paying of income taxis voluntary. [MC-to him it's voluntary since he's evaded paying it in the past]

“Our system of government is a voluntary taxation system.”

His most recent rating with the National Taxpayers Union is 7%, making him one of the most reckless spenders in congress.


Reid’s views on energy and the environment are unbelievable. He wholeheartedly believes in global warming and will support any and all legislation that will cripple American industry in order to bring us in compliance with the demands of the radical environment movement.

His attitude toward our natural resources is stunning; he told one group this:

“Coal is making us sick…oil makes us sick. Its global warming, it’s ruining our country. It’s ruining our world.” [MC-his deals with solar farms might have something to do with it]

Reid opposes all oil drilling, including drilling in ANWR. He opposes nuclear energy; His solution for American energy crisis is solar and wind energy, a ridiculous notion according to energy experts. While economical, solar and wind energy can never meet all our energy needs. [MC-his shady deals with solar farms might have something to do with it]

Naturally, Reid supports the Cap and Trade legislation. (33)

Reid supports amnesty for all illegal aliens and introduced a bill last January that would do just that. The bill contains provisions which are anti-border security and even cite the unification of homosexual partners as justification for the amnesty!(34)
But Reid has also been in favor of open borders. He led an effort to block an amendment that required citizenship verification for those who receive stimulus funds. (35)

When Senator John Cornyn introduced an amendment to end the “Catch and Release” policy, Reid prevented a vote on it. (36)

In 2001, Reid placed an earmark in a bill that would give $5 million to the National Council of La Raza, a radical Hispanic group that advocates open borders. (37)

Harry Reid’s Mob Connections

The connections between Harry Reid and the Mafia are quite numerous, but much of it is complicated. Ironically, Reid wants to build a $50 million dollar “Mob Museum” in Las Vegas, paid for by the taxpayers. (38) Indeed, Reid inserted this money into the Stimulus Bill.

Why does Reid want to glorify a murderous bunch of thugs?

Does he have fond memories of the days when the Mob ran Las Vegas?

Reid likes to claim he was responsible for chasing the Mob out of Las Vegas and portrays himself as some type of hero by claiming to have “cleaned up Las Vegas and ushered in a new era of responsibility.” (39)

The fact is that the Mob may not be as involved with the casinos as they once were, but they are still heavily involved in Las Vegas and Reid knows this. In fact, the mob has moved into sports betting. Indeed, in a report requested by the U.S. Congress in 1999, the National Gambling Commission estimated illegal sports betting generates around $80 billion; half of that figure betted on football games. (40)

I will outline the major links Reid has with the Mob; most of this is taken from a 4-part report by a mysterious author with the alias “Fedora,” all of which can be accessed in the footnotes.

What Former FBI Agent Joseph Yablonsky Says

Yablonsky was a FBI special agent in charge of the Las Vegas office for four years, until his retirement in 1983. When interviewed by journalist Del Tartikoff in 1996 Yablonsky was asked questions about many Las Vegas figures, including Reid:

Yablonsky: “Harry Reid is a mealy-mouth, and he was in their pocket just like the rest of them. Of course, there’s certain things I know I can’t speak about because of Privacy Act considerations. But he’s a worm, and he was a congressman, back there, representing Mr. Greenspun, you know, trying to agitate in terms of my removal. But all you’ve got to do is

read the pone he read when they had that phony Sinatra licensing.”

Tartikoff: “He wrote a poem?”

Yablonsky explained that, even though Frank Sinatra has lost a gaming license in the State of Nevada back in 1963 after evidence surfaced that mobster Sam Giancana was the real owner of the Cal-Nevada Lodge at Lake Tahoe and that Sinatra was merely a mob-friendly figurehead, Sinatra was back before the state Gaming Control Board in the late ‘70s, seeing a gaming license again.

“After this ridiculous hearing,” he said, “when Sinatra went up for licensing which had no adversary witnesses – McNeil-Lehrer played a half-hour of it on their program without even making a comment, it was so obvious. And when it came up to the Gaming Commission, which you know is [the top tier of] a two-tiered system,

Reid was the chairman, and he read this kiss-ass poem. He’s a faker.” (41)

So here you have the former head FBI agent in charge of investigating the mob in Las Vegas admitting Reid was “in their pocket” and relating how Reid voted to return to Sinatra his license to own gaming casinos, even though the Gaming Commission had access to plenty of information indicating that Sinatra remained connected to the Mob.

The Gaming Commission, led by Reid, dismissed strong evidence presented by FBI informants and other police reports. During the proceedings, Sinatra lied about his relationship with Mobster Willie Moretti, claiming he was just “a neighbor.” Sinatra denied making a pay-off to Lucky Luciano and acted like he didn’t know Sam Giancana. When Sinatra was questioned about a 1976 photo of himself with a group of prominent Gambino family mobsters, Sinatra claimed that he didn’t even know these men and that one of them wanted a picture with him and “before I realized what happened, there were approximately eight or nine men standing around me and several other snapshots were made.” (42)

This outrageous pack of lies was accepted by Reid who told the New York Times that he found Sinatra’s defense convincing! As New York Times reporter Robert Lindsey recounted:

All the old charges appeared to have been dispensed with. Yet, at least some observers said afterward that they felt there was less to the hearing than met the eye. Mr. Sinatra was treated with a kind of awe. He and his lawyer-manager, Milton Rudin, appeared to know many of the panel’s questions in advance. Board investigators seemed to base many of their conclusions solely on the singer’s own word; on some points, their fact-finding appeared to have been naively superficial. . .

Several times, when asked a potentially embarrassing question, Mr. Sinatra said that his memory failed him; he also gave some puzzling replies. In answering a question about the incident that led to the loss of his gaming license in 1963, he firmly denied knowing that the late Sam Giancana, a Chicago mobster, had visited the Cal Neva Lodge in violation of state laws barring gangsters from casinos. But when asked if he had ever admitted knowing Mr. Giancana was there, he answered, ”I might have said almost anything; if I said it, I don’t believe I meant it because I never saw him.”. . . Whatever Mr. Sinatra’s relationships might have been with the underworld, no matter whether he had been treated unfairly by the press, as he claims, there appeared to be a desire at the hearing to reinstate him, if for no other reason than that he’s good for business. (43)

After Reid and his fellow gaming commissioners awarded Sinatra gaming rights regarding Caesars Palace, Caesars Palace donated at least $8,000 to Reid. (44)

Reid’s Ties to Mob Attorney Jay Brown

Jay Brown is a partner with Reid in a shady land deal that yielded $1.1 million for Reid, a transaction that he failed to report. Brown goes way back with the Mob mostly as one of the Mob’s main attorneys. Brown and his law firm have been counsel for numerous high profile mob cases. As the Washington Post reports:

Brown’s name has surfaced in federal investigations involving organized crime, casinos and political bribery since the 1980s.” (45); (46); (47)

Brown was also the attorney for a mob-controlled bar called the Crazy Horse and has close ties to the Bononno crime family.

Brown is also a huge donor to Reid, giving him or to his leadership fund close to $60,000. (48)

Reid has Four Sons who Work for a Law Firm that Defends Mobsters

All four of Reid’s sons have worked for Lionel Sawyer & Collins, a firm that also employs John Dawson, an expert in transferring assets offshore. It is believed that Dawson is involved with hiding the assets of convicted Mobster Rick Rizzolo, who was in trouble with the law for using his Crazy Horse bar to engage in illegal activities. Many people were beaten in this bar, some died, but those suing Rizzolo had a difficult time getting their money due to Rizzolo’s assets being hidden.

John Dawson’s brother Kent was appointed to the Federal Bench by Senator Reid. And Kent Dawson, as Judge, has a history of giving out lenient sentences to mob connected people. Both Kent and John Dawson are heavy donors to Harry Reid. (49); (50); (51)

The Reno managing partner of Lionel Sawyer & Collins is Frederick Whittemore, whose clients have included casino mogul Steve Wynn, identified in a Scotland Yard report as a front man for the Genovese Mob family and connected to some high profile drug dealers. (52)

Moreover, Rory Reid and Mob attorney Jay Brown both acquired stock in American Enterprises, a company that operates the Table Mountain Indian casino near Fresno, California and Brown became an agent for this company. A short time later, Brown and other officers of this company gave Reid campaign contributions. (53) Is it illegal for Harry Reid’s son to invest in the gaming business along with Mob lawyers and then used their connections to donate to Harry Reid? No, but it certainly raised the question of why so many mob-connected people want to keep Reid in power.

Reid was Investigated for Accepting Mob Bribes as Head of the Nevada Gaming Commission

While Reid was cleared of this charge, lots of questions remain. Federal authorities were unable to prove Reid was being bribed. However, the main evidence for this was a tape recorded conversation involving Kansas City Mobster Joe Agosto. Unknown to Agosto, the FBI was taping him:

“I’ve gotta Cleanface in my pocket.”

Cleanface was the codename Agosto gave Reid. At the time, Reid was chairman of the all powerful Nevada Gaming Commission.

But there was other evidence that Reid favored the Mob while serving as chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission. One of his first acts was to approve the sale of the Hacienda Hotel/Casino to an individual named Paul Lowden despite objections by the state’s Gaming Control Board having to do with “hidden associates” of Lowden’s. Lowden later gave $6,000 in campaign contributions to Reid. (54); (55)

Reid also led the Nevada Gaming Commission in approving a deal that allowed associates of Agosto to skim money from the Tropicana. What’s more, Reid also approved applicants for some projects proposed by the Del Webb Corporation, also known to be connected to mobsters Bugsy Siegel and Meyer Lansky. (56)

Indeed, Reid’s tenure on the Nevada gaming Commission appears to have involved approving quite a few projects for people with mob connections. Moreover, it was Jimmy Carter’s Justice Department which “cleared” Reid of the charge of accepting mob bribes.

This was a highly politicized department that was also unable to come up with any prosecutions in the Billygate, KoreaGate, ABSCAM, or BCCI scandals, despite massive evidence of corruption. (57)

It was Mob attorney and sometime Reid business partner, Jay Brown, who was accused of funneling casino money to Reid to influence his votes on the Gaming Commission. FBI informants had fingered Brown but when the grand jury questioned him, he took the fifth and refused to turn over the financial records for the Tropicana Casino, for whom he served as counsel. As a result of Brown’s obstructionism, the Justice Dept probe ended up going nowhere. For years after this, Brown was a heavy donor to Reid. (58); (59)

Essentially, Reid now has a political career and is able to claim he was never charged with bribery, all because the jury refused to believe an FBI information AND due to his buddy, Jay Brown, taking the fifth. No exactly a ringing endorsement of Reid’s honesty.

Reid has accepted money from many mob-connected people:

  • Morris Shenker, a mob attorney associated with the St. Louis Mafia, Meyer Lansky, Jimmy Hoffa and the Dunes Hotel. He funneled campaign money to Reid through his daughter Patty.
  • Moe Dalitz, associated with the Cleveland mob. He gave Reid $1,500.
  • Irwin Molasky & Merv Adelson. These were Dalitz partners in the Rancho La Costa development. Molasky has given at least $15,000 to Read and Adelson have given at least $40,000 to either Reid, his leadership committee or the DSCC which Reid controls.
  • Ed & Fred Doumani, associated with the Chicago Mob, gave at least $6,000 to Reid and the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee.
  • Kirk Kerkorian, former owner of Caesar’s Palace, has Mob ties and gave over $100, 000 to Reid or DSCC.
  • Steve Wynn, connected to the Genovese mafia family, gave Reid at least $19,000.
  • Sam & Edgar Bronfman. Sam was a bootlegging associate of Meyer Lansky. Edgar is his son. Both have made substantial contributions to Reid
  • Joseph Alioto. Alioto is a San Francisco politician related to Milwaukee Mafia boss John Alioto and was implicated in the Koreagate bribe scandal. He is his wife gave $5,000 to Reid. (60); (61)


1) Las Vegas Sun, 12/20/05

4) Associated Press, 2/9/06

5) Ibid

6) Las Vegas Review-Journal, 9/25/09

7) The Hill, 9/22/09, “Sen. Reid rebukes Sen. Vitter on ACORN.”

11) Associated Press, 10/16/06, “Reid Used Campaign Money for Christmas Bonuses at Personal Condo.”

15) Associated Press, 10/11/06, “Democrat leader reaped $1.1 million from sale of land he didn’t own.”

19) This info is from the 2009 Pig Book, published by Citizens Against Government Waste

21) Ibid

22) Los Angeles Times, 11/13/06, “Will the Pork stop Here?”

23) See Department of Defense Appropriations bill, 2010, 9/10/2009

24) The Salt Lake Tribune, 10/13/09, “Reid rips LDS church’s Prop. 8 support.”

26) Sen. Harry Reid press conference, 4/3/07

27) Human Events, 4/20/07, “Harry Reid, Loser.”

28) Wall Street Journal, 8/18/09, “Harry Reid’s Evil Moment.”

29) CNS News, 8/13/09, “Rockefeller uses Health-Insurance Profits stats calculated by ACORN-backed group.”

30) Ibid

31) Face the Nation, 4/10/05

32) H.R. 3589, 7/18/83

43) Ibid.

44) Ibid.

52) Ibid

53) Ibid

51) Ibid

52) Ibid


And you should read this…more at the site…


Harry Reid makes law to suit his greed…


My heads spinning….this despicable little man should’ve been in jail 50 yrs ago. After reading only a few articles about this creep (there’s soooo much out there) I feel dirty – gotta go shower. And he must be brought to justice and never again be permitted to attack a decent man like Mr Bundy. So many ranchers have lost their land because of this fiend…we can’t allow it to happen to the Bundy’s!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Soviet Propaganda Posters Hanging In The WH Press Secretary’s Home

Hunter Walker – April 11, 2014

Washingtonian MOM magazine’s spring issue has a profile of White House Press Secretary Jay Carney’s wife, ABC News contributor Claire Shipman, that features a picture taken inside their home. In the background of the photo, you can see two framed Soviet-era propaganda posters.

One of Carney’s posters is a version of this iconic design by artist Dmitry Moor with a soldier pointing his finger alongside text that says “Have YOU Enlisted?” in Russian:

soviet poster

The other poster features a female factory worker. According to this eBay seller, who is offering one for $1,660, the poster was printed on June 26, 1941, days after Russia began fighting the Axis powers in World War II. It encourages women take jobs vacated by men who have gone to fight. The woman in the poster is switching out a tag with a man’s name to one with hers and the text says: “Women! Learn production, replace workers who went to the front! The stronger the hinterland – the stronger the front!”

soviet poster


Carney and Shipman have a lot of history with Russia. They met in Moscow in the 1990s while he was writing for Time and she worked for CNN. Carney did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider Friday.

Breaking eggs & Soviet propaganda art ... Red Diaper Doper babies at the Claire Shipman/Jay Carney home photo 192117_5__zps79a86384.png

This is the picture in the magazine. Pictures can be seen in the background.

And this one’s in Obama’s bedroom. Well it could be… :)

Don’t forget their first WH Mao-Xmas tree decorated with mao.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

UPDATE: Missing Airline MH370 Underwater Mini-Sub Aborts First Search

4/15/15 | By Agencies

A mini-sub hunting for Malaysian jet MH370 aborted its first search of the remote Indian Ocean seabed after just six hours because the water was deeper than its operating limits, officials said Tuesday.

The unmanned submarine loaded with sonar to map the ocean floor deployed Monday night from the Australian ship Ocean Shield which has spearheaded the hunt for the Boeing 777 that vanished on March 8.

“After completing around six hours of its mission, Bluefin-21 exceeded its operating depth limit of 4,500 metres and its built in safety feature returned it to the surface,” JACC said, without detailing the exact depth of operations.

“The six hours of data gathered by the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle is currently being extracted and analysed,” JACC said.  The AUV had been due to spend up to 16 hours collecting data.

US Navy Captain Mark Matthews explained the vehicle had exceeded its programmed operational limit and automatically resurfaced.  “There’s certain abort criteria that the vehicle has as it’s executing its mission,” he told CNN from Perth.  “If there’s certain conditions that occur, it stops and it comes to the surface.

“In this case the vehicle’s programmed to fly 30 metres over the floor of the ocean to get a good mapping of what’s beneath.”  Charts put the depth at 4,200-4,400 metres, he said.

“It went to 4,500 metres and once it hit that max depth, it said this is deeper that I’m programmed to be, so it aborted the mission.”

Matthews, a search and recovery expert, said the crew would now refine the task to cope with the depth encountered.

“It happened in the very far corner of the area it’s searching. So they are just shifting the search box a little bit away from that deep water.”


Prayers up that they’re successful…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sheriff Mack – “Feds are preparing a raid on Bundy Home”

Published on Apr 14, 2014

Exclusive: Sources Inside The BLM and Las Vegas Metro Say Feds Are Planning A Raid On Bundy Home

Bunkerville, NEVADA, April 14, 2014– As reported yesterday, hundreds of federal agents are still at the Bundy Ranch and the area continues its status as a no-fly zone. Despite major media reports that the Nevada Bureau of Land Management is retreating, the remaining activity that still surrounds the ranch illustrates a different scenario.

Not only is the BLM not actually backing off of Cliven Bundy, Sheriff Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association has revealed stunning information: on Ben Swann’s radio program, Mack said that he has received intelligence from multiple, credible sources inside the BLM and the Las Vegas Metro that there is “no question” that the federal government is planning a raid on the Bundy home and the homes of their children who live on the property.

Read more:…

Sheriff Mack: “If they do that kind of raid, I don’t believe there’s any way that could happen without bloodshed,”


Bundy Ranch – Great Audio - brief, coherent, rational, intelligent, commonsense, and clarifying update. Well worth a listen!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sen. Harry Reid: Bundy Dispute ‘Not Over’

“We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over”

Mikael Thalen
April 14, 2014

After remaining silent for days, Nevada Sen. Harry Reid made comments regarding the ongoing dispute between the Bureau of Land Management and rancher Cliven Bundy today, accusing the Bundy family of violating the law.

“Well, it’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over,” Reid told News 4.

Despite telling the Bundy family that a deal had been reached Saturday after federal agents were forced to retreat, the BLM reversed its promise Monday and told reporters that they planned to go after Bundy “administratively and judicially.”

“The door isn’t closed. We’ll figure out how to move forward with this,” BLM spokesman Craig Leff said. “The BLM and National Park Service did not cut any deal and negotiate anything, there was no deal we made.”

Unsurprisingly, reporters made no attempt to question Reid regarding his involvement after an Infowars report linked Reid to the attempted Bundy land grab.

The most read news story in the world Friday, Infowars reporter Kit Daniels revealed documents linking Reid and the BLM’s director, Reid’s former senior adviser, to a Chinese energy firm that has been working to remove Bundy from his home in order to install solar panel power stations.

“Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle,” one document states about Bundy’s cattle.

Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid, has been the chief representative to the Chinese firm, which announced its plan to build a $5 billion solar plant on public Nevada land in 2012.

Despite multiple attempts by the BLM to regulate Bundy off the land his family has worked on for more than 140 years, in one instance claiming Bundy was harming an endangered tortoise that the agency itself was killing in mass, Bundy has continued to remain the last rancher in his area.

Although corporate media outlets are attempting to sway public opinion, Bundy supporters continue to arrive at the ranch to provide support. Regardless of the federal government’s next move, the BLM’s heavy handed response to the situation, which included snipers, assaults, a no-fly zone, a First Amendment Area and threats of death, has shattered their public image.

Fresh off the historic victory, which saw federal agents back down to Americans and return nearly 100 cattle, Bundy supporters remain on scene, awaiting the federal government’s next move. Source


BLM “Contractors” – We’re going to shoot you if you don’t move back.”

Who will be held responsible for the BLM threatening to shoot hundreds of Americans?

During the final standoff at the Bundy Ranch on Saturday, we had a hundred or more militarized government agents and snipers aiming military grade weapons at hundreds of innocent American citizens. And they were being ordered through a public address system to move away or they would be “SHOT!” Their crime? Standing in defense of a Nevada citizen who was being ruthlessly tormented by rogue federal agencies over a twenty year period.

The fact that the BLM seemed to be perfectly willing to slaughter innocent Americans using military grade weapons and tactics over “grazing fees” on public lands is a national disgrace. This is the work of a criminal government.

You might expect a communist or fascist regime to do this, not the American government. This agency is totally out of control and heads need to roll.

I’d suggest starting with Senator Reid’s Nevada henchman, his former aide Neil Kornze, who is now the chief of the BLM. Then a serious congressional investigation into Reid and his son’s involvement in this matter would be in order.

And if there’s any truth whatsoever in the reports that Reid and his son are involved with the Chicom government in trying to bring Chinese investments or Chinese solar operations to the Nevada desert, and Senator Reid is using his government power and or connections to the BLM to help move this along, they need to be charged and prosecuted.

Or if Senator Reid is using his power and connections in any way shape or form whatsoever to aid the BLM in its threatening actions against American citizens, he needs to be ejected from the U.S. Senate. Source


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Flashback: Sen. Reid Breaks Ground for Nevada Solar Farm Near Bundy Ranch

The senator’s plan for solar farms in Nevada wasn’t just limited to the shelved project near Laughlin

Kit Daniels
April 14, 2014

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who was exposed last Friday as the mastermind behind the Bureau of Land Management’s persecution of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, can be seen in this March 2014 photo breaking ground for a new solar farm near the Bundy Ranch, emphasizing that the senator’s plan for solar projects in Nevada wasn’t just limited to the shelved solar farm near Laughlin.

Credit: First Solar Media press release via Business News

Signaling the first day of construction of the Moapa Southern Paiute Solar Project, which is about 35 miles from the Bundy homestead in Bunkerville, Nevada, Sen. Reid joined representatives from the Moapa Band of Paiutes, executives from First Solar, Inc. and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power for the groundbreaking ceremony on March 21.

“First Solar is thrilled to celebrate this important milestone with Sen. Reid and distinguished guests, and honored to work with the Moapa Band of Paiutes on this landmark project,” Jim Hughes, the CEO of First Solar, said at the time.

The development of solar farms just like this one is exactly why Sen. Reid was using the BLM, whose director is Reid’s former senior advisor, to push Bundy out of the Gold Butte area his family has worked for over 140 years.

As we revealed last Friday in an article that became the #1 news story in the world for 24 hours, the BLM specifically stated that it wanted Bundy and his cattle out of the area as part of the agency’s “regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone.”

The BLM attempted a cover-up by deleting documents exposing the plan from its web site, but fortunately contributors at the Free Republic were able to save them for posterity.

Others have attempted to whitewash the situation by suggesting that the solar farm development was only limited to the shelved 2012 deal between Sen. Reid and Chinese-owned ENN Energy Group in Laughlin, Nev., but by reading the BLM’s own documents it is quite obvious that this is not the case.

“The BLM’s current action builds on the Western Solar Energy Plan, a two-year planning effort conducted on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Energy to expand domestic energy production and spur development of solar energy on public lands in six western states,” the BLM announced in a March 14 press release. “The Western Solar Energy Plan provides a blueprint for utility-scale solar energy permitting in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah by establishing Solar Energy Zones with access to existing or planned transmission, incentives for development within those Solar Energy Zones, and a process through which to consider additional Solar Energy Zones and solar projects.”

“The Regional Mitigation Strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone is the first of several pilot plans to be developed by the BLM,” the press release added.

In summary, the BLM, acting under Sen. Reid’s corrupt interests, wants Cliven Bundy out of the 600,000 acre Gold Butte area so the agency can use the land for future solar projects and de facto buffer zones surrounding the solar farms.

This is crony capitalism at its finest and Bundy’s supporters, who numbered in the thousands, knew it. Source

Why doesn’t Harry put some of these solar “farms” on his land in Searchlight?

And what’s going to happen to the Tortoises?


This is an except from a book about “Dirty” Harry…

Money, Mob & Influence In Harry Reid’s Nevada

Authored by Daxton Brown

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s connections to money, mob and influence in Nevada going back fifty years (fourth edition). Revelations from Reid’s first campaign manager and others paints a picture of a politician taking money on the side. Most shocking is the polygraph backed claim that Harry Reid took unreported donations from pimp Joe Conforte of the Mustang Ranch brothel in the years leading up to Reid’s time on the Nevada Gaming Commission. Conforte’s links to mob figures like Jimmy ‘the Weasel’ Fratianno and Johnny Simone mean the mob knew Reid was on the take. Also disturbing are accounts of Reid’s long friendship with a lawyer to many of the most notorious strip clubs in Las Vegas – some of whose owners just did jail time for bribery and were Reid’s political proteges. Oscar Goodman, Las Vegas Mayor and lawyer to the mob also enters the picture. Sweetheart treatment of land developers, the G-Sting scandal, fat cat campaign contributors and more taint the record of Senator Reid, one of the most powerful politicians in the U.S…




Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bundy Ranch False Flag?

Published on Apr 13, 2014

“I am putting this up WAY out of chronological order because of its importance. LVPD Sheriff Gillespie said that the BLM would pull out and release the cattle back to Mr. Bundy within an hour of his (Gillespie’s) speech to the crowd. It did not happen as he promised. Worse, an MRAP and a LVPD SWAT team were only one exit away. Why? After the discovery of the MRAP and the SWAT Team, Gillespie claimed they were to keep the peace. But if the cattle were released according to the promise of Gillespie, no need to “keep the peace” would have existed. Another conflicting aspect was the statement of his Deputy, Dep. Jenkins, who told Brand that the release of the cattle was “Not going to happen.”

Therefore, Brand and I conclude that a more sinister and deadly trap was being set to end the lives of many people, especially the BLM officers, and to use the massacre as an excuse to implement far more stringent and tyrannical controls over the American People. Gillespie sits on the board of the despicable Southern Poverty Law Center and the DHS. This was a highly sophisticated manipulation to kill as many as possible and blame it on the liberty/conservative movement.” youtube - gopdailydoseblog


Th video is a long-winded recording by two very exhausted but obviously sincere people, who felt their story important enough to be recorded. These militia guys were at Bundy Ranch all week, and they suspect this was a false flag set-up. They believe that feds sent in BLM “contractors”  to be slaughtered. This was cemented by the fact that they had heard conflicting remarks made by Sheriff Gillespie and his Deputy/ The Sheriff stated on camera that the Bundy’ were going to get their cattle back - yet later the Deputy told one of them that this wasn’t the plan. In the video they questioned the saftey factor of leaving the overpass open for through traffic and also the motivation at having a SWAT team and armored vehicles an exit away. One of them also saw fear in the eyes of the 20 BLM “contractors”  when they suddenly realized they were alone, boxed in on a river bed, with no immediate backup at hand. It was at this point apparently that the BLM “contractors” realized they were being setup and backed off leaving a lot of technical equipment and other vehicles behind.

Some questions I’ve seen at a couple of sites albeit abbreviated :

  • A SWAT team and an armored vehicle waiting one exit away?
  • Why didn’t BLM follow through with promise to release cattle?
  • Why didn’t they lay down their weapons?
  • Why were they waiting in the river bed arms drawn?
  • If they intended to fight, why was the SWAT team waiting off site instead of moving in to support BLM?
  • Why didn’t they shut down the freeway overpass if they were worried about a fight?
  • Why did they allow themselves to be surrounded and boxed in so easily?
  • Was this just a test to see what the militia could turn out?
  • The BLM were surrounded by 500 armed Militia – the Feds now know who they are – they need to be careful else
  • It’s on tape that the BLM “contractors” threatened to shoot the crowd if they came too close. Were they told to say that?
  • The guys in the video said the BLM “contractors” left behind generators, communication equipment, even vehicles in their haste to get the hell out of the river bed.
  • One of them also said “Those guys figured out at the last minute that they had been set up to be slaughtered.”
  • I thought the government forces had a much better tactical position and resources than they did; I thought the Bundy supporters were going to be a sacrifice.
  • Yes, one wonders why they just didn’t have a swat team come in and try and scoop up Bundy prior to the public fiasco they created.
  • Just wondering why the two guys in the video keep wondering if some of the BLM agents could have been foreign contractors
  • There was going to be dying on both sides but there is no doubt that the BLM was out numbered and out gunned. It would not have ended well for them.
  • Now this is definitely something to be considered. False flag within a false flag within an illegal taking by government under color of law.
  • They didn’t leave. They just pulled back for now and as soon as the crowd leaves they’ll go in and slaughter the Bundy family.
  • And many comments saying - you’re all nutcases…

Not shutting down the overpass flow of traffic was highly unusual, it’s the first thing a safety officer would do, in order to protect the people. But the most worrisome part of the confrontation was when I heard on the audio, a BLM “contractor” telling the people from a loudspeaker, that if the people (who had their weapons down) came any closer they were going to shoot – one might suspect this order came from the BLM leader at their command center. Despite the threat the people continued moving forward – weapons down. No shots were fired.

When they got to the barricade, listen to BLM spokeman at this video  speaking to Bundy’ son, he asked that Bundy and his son to go through the barricade to “talk” about the cattle. Was the plan to hold Bundy and his son and then call in the armored vehicles and backup who were positioned about 1/2 mile away?  The son, heard on the video, refused and insisted they leave. It was at this point perhaps that the BLM “contractors” realized they were set-up to be slaughtered by the BLM leaders. They were surrounded from all sides with no back-up, out-numbered, and out-gunned. Perhaps this was why the BLM “contractors” backed up and high-tailed it out of dodge leaving behind their hi-tech equipment, and vehicles.

It was certainly a tinder-box especially when they threatened to shoot. The opinions of the people recorded on the video could have been heightened due to their lack of sleep, which can leave anyone a bit paranoid, still wanted to post it for posterity. We’re all nutcases for giving it any credence? Perhaps! :) The fact remains these people were present at the Bundy Ranch. Another fact is that the Obama administration wants to eradicate the 2nd amendment and needs something big in order to grab the weaponry from the people. So anything critical that happens one is always on the alert for a false flag since it could lead to Martial Law!!!

PS: Forgot to mention the BLM leaders also shut down airspace above the ranch along with taking the cell towers out of service to prevent video uploads!

Note: I haven’t noticed the Marshall’s or the FBI around…laying low or trying to stay out of it…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Oops! Obama ‘champion’ scrubbed from website

WND ^ | 04/14/2014 | Aaron Klein


Without any explanation, the White House has scrubbed from its website an amnesty advocate who was honored by President Obama but who was then indicted for immigration fraud.

Immigration attorney Bonnie M. Youn was picked by the White House as one of 11 Cesar Chavez “Champions of Change” activists who purportedly embody the spirit and legacy of Chavez, a labor leader and civil rights activist.

According to a Breitbart report, however, on April 1, Youn was indicted on three criminal counts related to harboring illegal aliens. The charges included perjury, harboring an illegal alien for commercial and private financial gain and tampering with the witness testimony of an illegal alien.

In touting her as one of Obama’s 11 “Champions of Change,” the White House website originally listed Youn as “a recognized Asian American & Pacific Islander (AAPI) community leader in Georgia.”

Without any explanation or recognition of the alteration, however, the White House website quietly sliced the 11 “Champions of Change” to only 10 so-called champions.

“The White House honors 10 community leaders who embody the spirit of Cesar E. Chavez’s legacy,” reads the new text.

The online link for Youn’s bio now brings readers to a page that states: “UPDATE We’re updating the White House privacy policy, which will go into effect on April 18.”

Youn’s name, however, is still visible on the page as one of the “Champions of Change”

They can’t even manage a simple social event right…wish this was only the first time.  What a bunch of incompetent fools. And I believe Chavez was totally against illegals and amnesty for illegals.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Judge Napolitano: Ranch Rebellion Was Americans’ “Line in the Sand”

Prayers up by ranchers prior to their confrontation with the BLM “contractors” yesterday.


Judge Napolitano: BLM feds should have been arrested for theft of private property

Paul Joseph Watson
April 14, 2014

Judge Andrew Napolitano appeared on Fox News to denounce the federal government’s operation against Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy, asserting that BLM agents should have been arrested for seizing his property and that the case represents a “line in the sand” for Americans who have had enough of big government tyranny.

Napolitano said the feds were forced to back down because they had suffered a public relations nightmare, pointing out that Bundy lost his case in a federal court but that the case should have been tried in a state court.

“The federal judiciary should not be deciding what land the federal government owns,” said Napolitano, adding that the feds should have placed a lien against Bundy’s property to collect grazing fees and not conducted a raid backed up by armed agents to seize his private property.

“The government’s option is to take the amount of money he owes them and docket it, that is file the lien on his property….the federal government could have done that, instead they wanted this show of force,” said Napolitano, adding, “They swooped in….with assault rifles aimed and ready and stole this guy’s property, they stole his cattle, they didn’t have the right to do that, that’s theft and they should have been arrested by state officials”.

Napolitano also chastised the BLM’s ludicrous creation of a ‘First Amendment Area’ outside of which free speech was banned. Protesters completely ignored the zone and it was quickly torn down by BLM officials after being widely derided in the media.

“They established something utterly repellant in America, a First Amendment Zone….the square was three miles away from where these events were going – this is the federal government emasculating the First Amendment rights of the protesters,” said the judge.

Napolitano characterized the resistance shown by Bundy supporters as a clear example of how Americans feel, “enough is enough with the federal government, we’re drawing a line in the sand right here – and it drew people from all around the country who basically said ‘quit your heavy handed theft of property and act like you’re a normal litigant and not God almighty’.”

As we reported on Saturday, around 380 cattle were eventually released by BLM agents who then left the scene after a confrontation with hundreds of Bundy supporters who refused to back down despite facing threats that they would be shot dead.

However, the BLM has still vowed to pursue Bundy legally for the $1 million dollar grazing rights fee they claim he owes. Bundy asserts the land in question has been in his family for generations and has said he will only pay the fee to Clark County and not the feds.


VIDEO: the Judge is speaking for millions of Americans. And from what I can gather the Corporate Media has hardly mentioned Harry Reid and his accomplices cronyism roles.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Concerns that West African Ebola Virus May Have Spread to Morocco



Moroccan media outlets and prompted concerns over a probable outbreak of the West African Ebola virus in Morocco.

As a matter of fact, the sources alleged that the Moroccan authorities may have sent some West Saharan natives directly from Airport Mohammed V in Casablanca to the Moulay Youssef hospital after suspecting their contamination with the virus.

The Moroccan authorities denied this right away.

Mr.Abdelghani Drhimeur, Ministry of health’s spokesman, said that “no infection case with the Ebola virus has been detected, whether within Morocco or in any of its airports,” as relayed by

Prayers up that this is just a scare.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

VIDEO: Irish Priest’s Version of Leonard Cohen’s ‘Hallelujah’

Video of Father Ray Kelly’s version of Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” was taped at a recent wedding in Ireland. The priest is from Oldcastle, Co. Meath, Ireland. He  told reporters that the couple had no idea what was going to happen. Father Kelly changed the lyrics to make the song more suitable. He’s made a few albums for local charities.


Oldcastle is the birthplace of St. Oliver Plunkett. The last Irish Catholic Martyr to die in England. The Plunkett family estate was stolen by the English after Cromwell’ and his “Model Army” slaughtered the indigent Irish. St. Oliver Plunkett was hanged, drawn & quartered in Tyburn, London in 1681 on false charges. That’s how “land grabs” happened in those days.

Hanged, Drawn, and Quartered: Convicts were fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where they were hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces). Their remains were often displayed in prominent places across the country, such as London Bridge.,_drawn_and_quartered

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

NATO Wants More Military Spending? More than $990 billion?

Published on Apr 11, 2014 – Ben Swann

A lot of talk about the need for increased military spending by NATO countries in order to combat the threat of the Russians in Eastern Europe. What the media isn’t telling you… how much money NATO countries already spend on military compared to the Russians.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

VIDEO: Feds Forced to Surrender to American Citizens

Published on Apr 13, 2014

In an epic standoff that Infowars reporter David Knight described as being like “something out of a movie,” supporters of Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy advanced on a position held by BLM agents despite threats that they would be shot at, eventually forcing BLM feds to release 100 cattle that had been stolen from Bundy as part of a land grab dispute that threatened to escalate into a Waco-style confrontation.


It helps when the people are armed – there were also militia men and women on standby covering both sides and up on the bridge. A few days ago the federal government used tazers and attack dogs on unarmed men and women. This time the ranchers armed themselves, and the feds gave back the stolen cattle as they high-tailed it out of town. It also helped when Cronysim (government + big business = cronyism per Mussolini who should certainly know) was discovered – the BLM Director was once an aide to Sen. Harry Reid, that Harry Reid and his son Rory were in a crooked land deal with a Chinese billionaire. This was an abuse of power by an elected official and I’m looking forward to watching Harry Reid being put behind bars. This corrupt government, along with other corrupt governments around the world, are working for the Globalist Mafia while we’re being ignored and robbed blind by these Internationalists. They must be stopped! Throwing Harry Reid in prison would be a good start at cleaning house.


I posted this within a blog yesterday but it deserves a blog of it’s own. Enjoy!


Thusfar on youtube - likes = Like Dislikedislikes = 49

BTW, why does the Gov need heavily armed forces in riot gear and shields to collect cattle?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Harry Reid: Ranch Showdown Blows Lid off Long-Standing Plans With the Chinese

Reid smelling anything but rosy in ranch fight – By Jerome R. Corsi

April 13, 2014


NEW YORK – When Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy refused to take his cattle off land the federal government demanded for the habitat of an endangered desert tortoise, it focused the nation’s attention on an arena Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., may have preferred to be kept quiet.

An investigative report published last week by drew a connection between Senate Majority Leader Reid’s involvement with Chinese energy giant ENN, Chinese efforts to build massive solar facilities in the Nevada desert and the showdown between Bundy and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, or BLM.

It wasn’t the first report to notice curious dealings involving the Chinese and America’s top Democrats.

Harry Reid’s last roundup: Exclusive: Joseph Farah exposes China deal possibly driving fed action against rancher

On Jan. 20, 2013, WND warned Chinese government-backed economists were proposing a plan to allow Chinese corporations to set up “development zones” in the United States as part of a plan proposed by the Chinese government to convert into equity the more than $1 trillion in U.S. Treasury debt owned by the Chinese government.

The next day, Jan. 21, 2013, WND documented the Obama administration had begun to allow China to acquire major ownership interests in oil and natural gas resources across the USA.

China grabs oil interests in USA

The first major intrusion of China in the U.S. oil and natural gas market can be traced to the Obama administration decision in October 2009 to allow state-owned Chinese energy giant China Offshore Oil Corporation, or CNOOC, to purchase a multi-million dollar stake in 600,000 acres of South Texas oil and gas fields.

By allowing China to have equity interests in U.S. oil and natural gas production, the Obama administration reversed a policy of the Bush administration that in 2005 blocked China on grounds of national security concerns from a $18.4-billion dollar deal in which China planned to purchase California-based Unocal Corp.

China’s two, giant, state-owned oil companies acquiring oil and natural gas interests in the USA are CNOOC, 100-percent owned by the government of the People’s Republic of China, and Sinopec Group, the largest shareholder of Sinopac Corporation, an investment company owned by the government of the People’s Republic of China, incorporated in China in 1998, largely to acquire and operate oil and natural gas interests worldwide.

On March 6, 2012, the Wall Street Journal compiled a state-by-state list of the $17 billion in oil and natural gas equity interests CNOOC and Sinopec have acquired in the United States since 2010.

  • Colorado: CNOOC gained a one-third stake in 800,000 acres in northeast Colorado and southwest Wyoming in a $1.27-billion pact with Chesapeake Energy Corporation.
  • Louisiana: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 265,000 acres in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale after a broader $2.5-billion deal with Devon Energy.
  • Michigan: Sinopec gained a one-third interest in 350,000 acres in a larger $2.5-billion deal with Devon Energy.
  • Ohio: Sinopec acquired a one-third interest in Devon Energy’s 235,000 Utica Shale acres in a larger $2.5-billion deal.
  • Oklahoma: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 215,000 acres in a broader $2.5-billion deal with Devon Energy.
  • Texas: CNOOC acquired a one-third interest in Chesapeake Energy’s 600,000 acres in the Eagle Ford Shale in a $2.16-billion deal.
  • Wyoming: CNOOC has a one-third stake in northeast Colorado and southeast Wyoming after a $1.27-billion pact with Chesapeake Energy. Sinopec gained a one-third interest in Devon Energy’s 320,000 acres as part of a larger $2.5-billion deal.

On March 6, 2012, in a separate story, the Wall Street Journal described that China’s strategy implemented since 2010 by Fu Chengyu, who has served as chairman of both CNOOC and Sinopec, involved the following components: “Seek minority states, play a passive role, and, in a nod to U.S. regulators, keep Chinese personnel at arm’s length from advanced U.S. technology.”

Harry Reid and Chinese solar investments in Nevada

On April 3, 3012, Bloomberg reported Chinese billionaire Wang Yusuo, one of China’s richest citizens and the founder of Chinese energy giant ENN Group, had teamed up with Senate Majority Leader Reid to win incentives including land 113 miles southeast of Las Vegas that ENN sought to buy for $4.5 million, less than one-eighth of the land’s $38.6 million assessed value.

Bloomberg reported ENN intended to create solar energy farms on the Nevada land, despite the nearly 50 percent plunge in solar panel prices globally in the previous 15 months that led to the bankruptcy of solar equipment maker Solyndra LLC, which had received approximately $535 million in U.S. government loan guarantees.

Bloomberg further documented ENN had contributed $40,650 individually and through its political action committee to Sen. Reid over the previous three election cycles.

Subsequently, on Sept. 4, 2012, reported lawyer Rory Reid, the son of Sen. Reid, had been appointed the primary representative for ENN Energy Group, fronting the bid by the Chinese company to build a $5-billion solar panel plant on a 9,000-acre Clark County desert plot in Laughton, Nevada.

A Reuters report published on Aug. 31, 2012, documented that Reid was recruited by ENN during a 2011 trip he took to China with nine other U.S. senators, supposedly to invite Chinese investment in the United States.

The Senate group accompanying Reid on his 2011 trip to China included six other Democrats and three Republicans: Richard Shelby, R-Ala.; Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; Mike Enzi, R-Wyo.; Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; and Michael Bennet, D-Colo.

“A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67-year-old rancher,” blogger Dana Loesch wrote last week. “They want his land.”

Loesch pointed out that Reid has been accused by ranchers in Nevada of using the BLM to control Nevada land, over 84 percent of which is already owned by the federal government, and to pay back special interests, including his top donor, Harry Whittemore, who first urged Reid to have the habitat of the desert tortoise moved before he was convicted of violating federal election laws by illegally funneling $150,000 to Reid’s 2007 reelection campaign.

Confirmed by a 71-28 Senate vote on April 9, BLM chief Neil Kornze served as a former senior adviser to Reid before he joined BLM in 2011, serving for the past year as the agency’s principal deputy director, according to a CBS local television news report broadcast in Carson City, Nevada.

In 2012, BLM and the U.S. Department of Energy published a “Final Pragmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States” that charged established the basis for allowing the endangered desert tortoise to migrate habitats, paving the way to put solar energy development projects on acreage that includes public land at dispute in the Bundy standoff over grazing rights.

Loesch’s analysis of the BLM’s actions was echoed at the Moapa Valley Town board meeting last Wednesday when one of the local citizens rose to give a stirring defense of Cliven Bundy and issue a warning to the BLM.

“They can throw an army of men around there … with sniper rifles on people just like you are, men, women and children … out there, who believe they have a right to be there,” he said.

“Maybe you believe in some other place that you believe you can be. Someday they’re gonna throw that army of men around you. And then somehow they feel like they got the right … they can drop a damn tripod in the ground and set a sniper rifle on it, so if you cross a line, they can put a bullet in you. Who the hell is the man behind that trigger? I wanna know … which one of you guys gives that guy the authority to throw that rifle down? And when he does, which one of us is he going to shoot?”

“Good God, didn’t he grow up in this country? Are we gonna give it up? This is a helluva lot bigger than Clive Bundy.”

The audience erupted in applause as the man concluded his speech.

“And when Clive decides to go back in there after his cows, and they’ve got orders to shoot anyone who goes in there, I’m gonna be with him.”

Someone in the crowd piped up, “Carrying a gun I hope.”

“No, no,” he said, “because them son of a bitches will fire the next shot heard around the world … and we will fire the rest!”

The full speech can be viewed, below.

Earlier today, BLM announced it was terminating it’s operation at the Bunday ranch and would withdraw.


Does the Director of the BLM, who just happens to be a former aide to Harry Reid, and the lawyer involved who coincidentally is his son, believe that the Chinese would be better caretakers of the Tortoises than the cattle rancher? Until the BLM reduced the amount of cattle permitted on the Bundy Ranch there were hundreds of them since tortoises feed off of cattle waste.

And does the BLM director, Reids previous aide, really believe that a billionaire from China is interested in a Green Company since so many of them are bankrupt, not only here, but his own country in China? Reid aligned with Crony Capitalism? Mussolini would say yes, and who better to tell us.







Obama’s Bankrupted Green Companies in the USA: ( * Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy.)

  • Evergreen Solar ($24 million)*
  • SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
  • Solyndra ($535 million)*
  • Beacon Power ($69 million)*
  • AES’s subsidiary Eastern Energy ($17.1 million)
  • Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
  • SunPower ($1.5 billion)
  • First Solar ($1.46 billion)
  • Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
  • EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
  • Amonix ($5.9 million)
  • National Renewable Energy Lab ($200 million)
  • Fisker Automotive ($528 million)
  • Abound Solar ($374 million)*
  • A123 Systems ($279 million)*
  • Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($6 million)
  • Johnson Controls ($299 million)
  • Schneider Electric ($86 million)
  • Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
  • ECOtality ($126.2 million)
  • Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
  • Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
  • Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
  • Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
  • Range Fuels ($80 million)*
  • Thompson River Power ($6.4 million)*
  • Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
  • LSP Energy ($2.1 billion)*
  • UniSolar ($100 million)*
  • Azure Dynamics ($120 million)*
  • GreenVolts ($500,000)
  • Vestas ($50 million)
  • LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($150 million)
  • Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
  • Navistar ($10 million)
  • Satcon ($3 million)*

It is no secret that President Obama’s and green energy supporters’ (from both parties) foray into venture capitalism has not gone well. But the extent of its failure has been largely ignored by the press. Sure, single instances garner attention as they happen, but they ignore past failures in order to make it seem like a rare case. The government’s picking winners and losers in the energy market has cost taxpayers billions of dollars, and the rate of failure, cronyism, and corruption at the companies receiving the subsidies is substantial. Source

These elected officials can wait until they’re private citizens and venture all they want with their own money. Though one doesn’t see too many of them doing it rather they go to work for huge companies (they’ve “helped” while they were gov. officials) where they don’t have to venture while enjoying a huge salary.

There should be a legislation that none of them can garner these crony jobs until two years after they leave office. Enough already!


Perhaps this is the real reason…

Quick facts about mining plans on BLM land in The United States.

  • Acres of U.S. public land (BLM land only) under mining plans and notices, estimated: 36,560 <!–

    • Gold extracted from top 10 mines in U.S., 2002: $2.3 Billion ( 2.6 billion ounces)


    • Royalties paid for precious metals and minerals mined and sold: $0


• Foreign-owned corporations among top BLM land mine operators: 5 of 10<!–

• Countries outside U.S. that headquarter the top 10 operators: Mexico, Canada and England


• Pollution from all US mining operations, ranking among all U.S. industries: : #1 in total toxic releases

• Pollution from top 89 mines in US: 5 times pollution from entire U.S. chemical industry (3,600 plants)

• Western water polluted by mine waste: 40 percent of Western headwaters

• Proposed mining operations that have been blocked by the Department of Interior because they posed a risk to public health or the environment: None

• Other land uses that supercede rights of mining companies to operate on public lands: None source


The EPA and their imposed strict, near impossible regulations, and their armed wing the BLM appear to concentrate on cattle ranchers, farmers, coal-miners who financially can’t meet their stringent standards therefore are driven out…whereas they close a blind eye to rich Mining Companies who give lucrative paybacks. Mining companies pay about $2.50-5 dollars an acre with no royalities to the gov. It’s just a thought thereagain was thinking it was for fracking a couple of days ago. Bottomline: There were 54 cattle ranches in this area a short while back and today there’s one left – the Bundy ranch.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Agenda 21: Land Grab in Florida State and Beyond

by Alex Newman, Gary R. Schor
Sections: World, Local, Property
From: Volume 2, Issue 2

OCALA – A decades-old scheme to eliminate private ownership of land has been working quietly to snatch up thousands of acres in North-Central Florida and across the nation under the guise of environmental protection. The plan, formally known as “Agenda 21,” was originally outlined in a 1976 United Nations report called ‘Habitat I.’

United States and Florida law enshrine the protection of life, liberty, and property, but the U.N. condemns private property and goes on to state that “public control of land use” is “indispensable.” Private land ownership, according to Habitat I, contributes to “social injustice.”

The two ideologies are irreconcilable, but Agenda 21 marches on with the support of the U.S. government and even state and local governments.

Figure 2. Linkages between the IUCN, Sustainable Development, UN Agenda 21 and supporting agencies, from Coffman’s “The Greening of America” Source

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment,” the U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs explains on its Web site.

In the final agreement after the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development, section H encouraged countries to “pursue these principles at the appropriate level of government,” recognizing that in countries like the U.S., the power is supposed to be divided among different levels of government.

So, the ‘Commission on Sustainable Development’ was created in 1992 to “ensure effective follow-up” of the U.N. “conservation” treaties and “to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels.”

According to the Department of Interior, the federal government alone owns almost 30 percent of the land in the U.S.

“The principles embodied in Agenda 21 present a framework for environmental action that should be pursued at all levels of society–in our schools, local communities, governments, and in our lifestyles,” said Rep. NANCY PELOSI before urging fellow representatives to co-sponsor the implementation of Agenda 21 in America.

The law she was pushing, HR-353, called for “national and international actions to integrate environment and development, negotiated and adopted by the United States and 177 other countries” and the U.S. “participating in a high-level U.N. Sustainable Development Commission.” It states in section B: “The United States Government should encourage and facilitate, at all levels of community and sectors of society, appropriate means for adopting individual Agenda 21 plans of action, including the establishment of local, county, State, business, and other boards and commissions for achieving sustainable development. Each member of the Congress should help initiate this process within their States or districts.”

The law passed in 1992.

Land in Alachua County shown in black has already been acquired while the gray areas have been ‘nominated.’ Programs like ‘Alachua County Forever’ and ‘Florida Forever’ were outlined in U.N. documents as part of ‘Agenda 21’, a global plan to put land under ‘public control.



Florida’s government has already acquired almost 6 million acres “that are managed for natural resource protection,” according to James A. Farr, the environmental supervisor at the Florida Division of State Lands. When combined with local and federal government holdings, almost 30 percent of Florida is strictly “conservation land.”

In an article titled ‘Florida’s Landmark Programs for Conservation and Recreation Land Acquisition,’ Farr also discusses the establishment of “land acquisition programs” by local governments.


 “We were often criticized, perhaps fairly, for purchasing more land than we were able to manage,” wrote Farr, his department’s chief, Greg Brock, and Presidential candidate MIKE HUCKABEE in the report they collaborated on.

Critics point to government mismanagement of land as one of the many reasons why it is better left in the hands of private owners with a vested interest in the property. One example commonly cited in Florida is the federal government’s waste of billions of dollars in an attempt to “drain” the everglades, then having to spend billions more to attempt restoration.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection boasts on its Web site of a new program to transfer control of land from the people to the government using the people’s tax money: the ‘Florida Forever Program.’

It will replace the “highly successful,” three-billion dollar “Preservation 2000 Program” which acquired almost two million acres over its 10 years.

“This new program is more than just an environmental land acquisition mechanism,” it says before assuring readers that eminent domain will not be used in “most circumstances.”

This is just one of Florida’s many programs or departments busily buying up land across the state.

In Alachua County, where the City of Gainesville flies a U.N. flag at city hall to celebrate U.N. day every year, and where the Sheriff is the chair of one of the local U.N. ceremonies, a land buying program similar to Florida Forever was approved in 2000.

It will manage over 5,000 acres of land and was involved in acquiring over 10,000. The ‘Alachua County Forever’ used a property-tax hike to raise $29 million which will fund the purchases, management and “improvement” of “environmentally significant lands.”

In Marion County, more and more land is also coming off the tax rolls and entering the realm of what propagandists call “public-private partnerships,” a union between big government and corporate interests that Mussolini appropriately named “corporatism.”



One of the immediate problems is that when this land is taken off the tax rolls, the burden is shifted by default to other home and business owners. Just last year the state government took ownership of more than 1,700 acres in Marion County, the second and final phase of a purchase near Silver Spring of almost 5,000 acres.

The move is part of a partnership between Marion County and The Nature Conservancy, an environmentalist group funded by wealthy foundations and government grants that buys up land for “conservation” or to sell to a government, often times for a lot more than it paid. It is supposedly to “protect the water quality” of Silver Springs – this in addition to land “owned” by the Greenways projects, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, national forests, state parks, and associated preserves.

Private property is also under attack with outrageous fees, regulations, and fines – like those proposed in Marion County last year under the guise of “springs protection,” say property rights activists.


The Fourth Amendment to The Bill of Rights protects Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures, yet lobbyists are hard at work to give the government the power to walk on to private property and demand that residents prove that they are in compliance with laws that many legal experts say are unconstitutional and ridiculous to begin with.


Though most don’t realize it, very few states even allow property to be owned in allodial title anymore. Texas and Nevada are among the holdouts, and the few that do posses an allodial title there are among the last true land owners in the world.

In Florida, tenants may own an interest or estate in land, subject to property taxes, zoning bureaucracies, and more. If an owner of what Florida statutes call “real property” or “real estate” can’t afford the taxes, the land can be sold to pay them.

Two or more individuals who “own” their property in Florida are known as “tenants in common.”


Throughout most of history, land available for true ownership by the common man has been rare, with property rights being reserved mostly for kings and nobles who could then charge the people rent.

America was founded on the principle that individuals have a right to own property, the fruits of their labor. But, at few times since Americans secured the right has it been more endangered than it is today, property rights activists say.

Most don’t openly advocate the destruction of private property rights or a return to the systems of the past that kept the bulk of the human population as penniless slaves and serfs. That doesn’t mean it isn’t being discussed behind closed doors.



 Corporate Feudalism
Images going left to right from the top:

King Henry VIII / Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke

Lord Chamberlain 6th Earl of Dorset / JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon

Archbishop of York Lancelot Blackburne / Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue

Chief Minister Thomas Cromwell / President Obama

Christopher Columbus / Fmr. Sec. of State Condoleeza Rice

Adm. Horatio Nelson / Surgeon & CNN Correspondent Sanjay Gupta

Monty Python (Life of Brian) / Characters from The Simpsons

Update: One mistake in the attribution of the images. The Monty Python pic is from Holy Grail, not Life of Brian.


Neo-Feudalism – those who are permitted to live will be corraled into cities to live in a 300 sq ft Apt. working for minimum wage at the mercy of your overlord. MC.

“Feudalism is coming back in a different guise,” said John McClaughry, a property rights advocate and retired State Senator…

“A growing body of legal theorists, allied with activist organizations and congenial political leaders, has been working very hard to replace the long-cherished concept of freehold property and land with the old feudal concept of social property. The essence of that theory is the contention that property and land cannot be owned by anyone.”

The land we live upon and the homes we reside in are much more than lines on a map, said a Marion County property rights activist concerned about Agenda 21.

“Property is the foundation of a free society, and the sacred heritage of any people who would dare lay claim to the right of liberty,” he said.

Even local governments are participating in these violations of property rights, said the activist who asked not to be named, so “let this be your siren warning.” “Environmentalism, with all of its ‘newspeak’ code words, is just the means by which our new feudal lords are selling us on the idea that private property is detrimental to society,” he explained.

The land use management concepts, according to the activist, come from a “pseudo-science” known as “conservation biology.”

“They use masterful public relations techniques,” he explained before going on to cite some examples.

“The Wildlands Project” has a nice sound, but it calls for the elimination of human presence on over 50% of the American landscape and heavily controlled activity on most of the rest. “Smart Growth” calls for dense human settlements subject to increasing controls on how we live and increasing restriction on our mobility.

The most damning evidence against this movement to people who support the right to own property comes right from the pages of its own founding documents.

The “Habitat I” report that provided the blueprint for Agenda 21 openly states:

“Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable.”

Property owners can only wonder, indispensable for whom?

“Since public property is a collectivist fiction, since the public as a whole can neither use nor dispose of its property, that property will always be taken over by some political elite, by a small clique which will then rule the public – a public of literal, dispossessed proletarians,” wrote Ayn Rand, a famous author renown for her fierce defense of capitalism and property rights.

In California, another state where these plans are relatively advanced, there are already laws on the books which call for the “decommissioning” of roads, homes, and businesses. This would mean the literal abolition of the communities that exist there. Roads, homes, schools, businesses, and churches will be “decommissioned,” all in the name of the environment.

And what of the idea that we must sacrifice private property rights for the benefit of the environment? That argument doesn’t stand up to even the most casual analysis, say defenders of property rights.

China and Russia, two countries that have rejected the notion of private property for generations, are environmental disasters. Seventy percent of China’s rivers are contaminated. In Dzerzhinsk, Russia, a former Cold War-era center for making chemical weapons, the average life expectancy is 42 for men and 47 for women.

With no private entity or stakeholder to protect and value the land and natural resources, the state has had the freedom to do as “it” saw fit. Private property is not only desirable for economic reasons, say virtually all economists, it is the only means by which to ensure that the environment is protected. Polluted land is of no value to its owner, and a polluter is liable for polluting his neighbors land.

“It is important that every American citizen recognize the goal of this plan for what it is; a return to the ideas that ruled humanity throughout the dark ages and the system where men and women toiled on their land only at the permission of the aristocratic ruling elite,” said the knowledgeable activist and property owner from Marion County.

The founders understood the concept of inalienable individual rights, rights that necessitate the ability to own property, rights that are derived from our Creator and are above the reach of government. They wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to secure and protect those rights.

The Statue of Liberty, Independence Hall and Thomas Jefferson’s home, Monticello, are all proud reminders of America’s heritage of freedom. Now, they’re also all considered official U.N. ‘World Heritage Sites.’

“Neither Congress, nor any state legislature, has ever voted to approve any of the 47 U.N. Biosphere Reserves in the United States. The management policy for millions of acres covered by these reserves is crafted by international committees of bureaucrats, none of whom is elected,” said Henry Lamb,the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and the chairman of Sovereignty International.

“To comply with ‘international obligations,’ the United States conforms its management policy and in some cases its law to accommodate the wishes of bureaucrats that are completely unknown to the people who are governed by the policies.”

The U.N.’s “declaration of human rights” states in article 29 that: “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”

Also, officials at the U.N.’s Commission on Global Governance “strongly endorse community initiatives to encourage the disarming of civilians,” according to their report, ‘Our Global Neighborhood.’ The Liberty Sentinel did an extensive report on the matter in Issue II of Volume I, including an interview with the C.E.O. of the National Rifle Association, Wayne LaPierre, and a headline story about the U.N. flag flying at city hall. Both are available online.


A few other examples of Land Grabs:

.Land grab in New Mexico…

Land grab in Utah…

Land grabs in Florida…

Land grab protests in Nebraska and South Dakota…

Land grabbers in congress…

Land grab in Montana…

Land grabs of Obama Admin http://www.propertyrightsallia…

Land grab in Texas…

Land grab in Wyoming (in court now)…


Don’t forgetOperation American Spring – May 16, 2014


Agenda 21: The Green Agenda: Club of Rome – Club of Budapest – Club of Madrid

Oklahoma House votes to nullify Agenda 21, 66-26

Australia To The UN: No More “Socialism Masquerading As Environmentalism” (Agenda 21)

AUDIO: 200 Cowboys on Horseback Attempting to Seize Back Cattle Stolen by the Rustlers/Feds

BLM Backs Down: Sen. Reid-Big Chinese Energy Land Grab Vs Bundy Family Ranch

FAA Designates Bundy Ranch a No-Fly Zone

Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy

If the Feds Take Your Cattle and Property, YOU Become

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better

Range War – Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better Have Funeral Plans” – “inbred bastards” – said we should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”

Life inside the densest place on earth: Remembering Kowloon Walled City (agenda 21)

Bottomline: It’s not about the turtles or polar bears, global warming, environment, greening of a country, conservation of the land or whatever…the plan is a lot more diabolical.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New HHS Secretary’ – first campaign at age 7 stumping for pro-abortion Sen. Jay Rockefeller

by Ben Johnson Fri Apr 11, 2014 15:53 EST

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 11, 2014 ( – The woman who will oversee the Obama administration’s implementation of the HHS mandate, requiring employers to give “free” contraception to all American women, spent a decade leading the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s population control efforts in the Third World.

President Obama has named Sylvia Mathews Burwell to succeed Kathleen Sebelius as secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Sylvia Mathews Burwell

Burwell served the Gates Foundation in a variety of capacities from 2001 until December 2011, including executive vice president, chief operating officer (COO), and president of its Global Development Program.

Its Global Development Program coordinates the Microsoft billionaires’ “family planning” efforts around the world, much of it funding Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion “philanthropies.”

Between 1998 and 2012, the Gates Foundation gave:

During Burwell’s tenure the Gates Foundation became a corporate partner of Pathfinder International, which “believes access to abortion services is not only a public health imperative, it is also every woman’s right,” according to its website. Its population reduction efforts are concentrated exclusively in the Global South.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation pledged $1.5 billion over five years to improving “maternal health,” much of it dedicated to “family planning.” Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, told LifeSiteNews at the time the program was “clearly a push for population control.”

In July 2012, Gates raised $2.6 billion for population control measures at a London-based summit, offering more than half-a-billion of the foundation’s own dollars. Gates insists her agenda “is not abortion. It is not population control.”

But she says promoting “family planning” is “my life’s work.”

For a decade, it was Burwell’s life’s work, as well. When she left the foundation in 2011 after being passed over to become CEO, Bill Gates said the future HHS nominee “put our global development work on a path to success, and we look forward to building on it.” Melinda Gates said Burwell’s “dedication to the world’s most vulnerable will be her lasting legacy at the foundation.”

Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan also saluted her accomplishments.

The 48-year-old Burwell has amassed a resume heavy on experience in the most elite centers of power in government and the non-profit sector.

Hailing from Hinton, West Virginia, the granddaughter of Greek immigrants served on her first campaign at age seven, stumping for pro-abortion Sen. Jay Rockefeller. She graduated from Harvard and became a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford.

She sits on the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)’s board of directors and is a member of the Trilateral Commission and the Aspen Strategy Group.

She worked as an aide to Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis before serving on his 1988 presidential campaign.

She served on President Clinton’s transition team in 1992, ultimately holding some post for all eight years of the Clinton administration. Although she worked in an economic capacity, she rose to become deputy chief of staff to the president alongside John Podesta.

After spending a decade with the Gates Foundation, she became president of the Walmart Foundation in January 2012.

Last February she was named to the President’s Global Development Council, which Obama established by executive order in 2012.

Finally, President Obama named her director of White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in March 2013.

Her appointment to lead HHS comes just as the Obama administration’s CDC issued a new report suggesting Medicaid pay for underage girls to get abortifacient contraceptives without their parents’ knowledge or consent.


Billionaires for Population Control: Bill Gates, Sr. (2nd from left), co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and father of the Microsoft founder, is pictured next to Ted Turner, George Soros and David Rockefeller who've all heavily donated to depopulation efforts.

Billionaires for Population Control: Bill Gates, Sr. (2nd from left), co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and father of the Microsoft founder, is pictured next to Ted Turner, George Soros and David Rockefeller who’ve all heavily donated to depopulation efforts.


Pro-abortionists and overpopulation believers – Bill Gates and Melinda Gates along with Kofi Annan think she’s going to be just dandy. If she’s so great why didn’t he give her the CEO job at his foundation in 2011?

Stumping for a Rockefeller certainly didn’t do her any harm. A Rhodes scholar…hmmm


Also see:

Sebelius Replacement-Sylvia Burwell: Bill Gates Vaccines, Common Core, GMOs in Africa



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Every Senator Probing Time Warner Cable Merger Took Comcast PAC Cash

Douglas Ernst – April 12, 2014

Money talks — or at least Comcast hopes it does. The Senate Judiciary Committee held its first congressional hearing on the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger Thursday, and every single member of the committee has taken money from Comcast PAC — even Democratic senator Al Franken of Minnesota, who is generally considered to be anti-Comcast.

Out of 18 committee members, 10 Democrats and eight Republicans, 17 got money from Comcast’s federal PAC, according to the database at, technology website Ars Technicareported.

Control! There’s so much that needs to be changed back - prior to the corporatists ever growing gigantic footprints and corruption within the government.

Ars Technica then confirmed with Mr. Franken’s spokespeople that he did accept $5,000 in Comcast PAC cash in 2009 for his recount fund, since did not have that donation listed.

The full list of Senate Judiciary Committee members and cash they’ve accepted from Comcast PAC donations are:

Comcast PAC donations to Democrats:

• Chuck Schumer, New York: $35,000

• Patrick Leahy, Vermont, Chairman: $32,500

• Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island: $26,500

• Chris Coons, Delaware: $25,000

• Dick Durbin, Illinois: $23,000

• Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota: $22,500

• Dianne Feinstein, California: $18,500

• Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut: $11,500

• Mazie Hirono, Hawaii: $5,000

Al Franken, Minnesota: $5,000 (2009 recount fund)

Comcast PAC donations to Republicans:

• Orrin Hatch, Utah: $30,000

• Chuck Grassley, Iowa, Ranking Member: $28,500

• John Cornyn, Texas: $21,000

• Lindsey Graham, South Carolina: $13,500

• Jeff Sessions, Alabama: $10,000

• Mike Lee, Utah: $8,500

• Ted Cruz, Texas: $2,500

• Jeff Flake, Arizona: $1,000

In Sen. Franken’s case, the recount money might not have been well spent.

“There’s no doubt that Comcast is a huge, influential corporation, and I understand that there are over 100 lobbyists making the case for this deal to members of Congress and our staffs,” Mr. Franken said on Thursday, Ars Technica reported. “But I’ve also heard from over 100,000 consumers who oppose this deal, and I think their voices need to be heard, too.”

Ultimately, it will be the FCC that either allows the merger to go through or not, but Comcast PAC knows that the senators wield tremendous clout.

“Congressional reaction will tend to influence how the agencies react,” wrote Harold Feld, seniors VP of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, Ars Technica reported.

Washington Times


Sounds like another well-invested “investigatory” panel – golly gee, wonder who they’ll favor?! And what contacts does Comcast have inside the FCC one might wonder…

We have the best politicians money can buy! USA Inc.


“This is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations. — How is this?”

~ Rutherford B. Hayes


Note: Be aware, Obama is trying to shut down our alternet medium outlets by transferring ICAAN: I’m sure he has a place on the ‘global community’ board that will assign IPs and you can bet those who disagree with their agenda won’t be approved for an IP. No IP, no Internet.

Obama didn’t do this on a whim, he’s been looking for a way to shut us up and now he’s found it. He’s doing his usual distractions, nothing to see here, etc. to stall until the transfer is completed but Congress can stop it now .

All Congress has to do is tell ICAAN to stop the transfer, the Prez doesn’t have the authority to authorize it.

“The Property Clause of the Constitution says Congress must pass legislation to effect a transfer of government property.”

How to Save the Internet - The major reason the BLM backed off was the net. source

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

AUDIO: 200 Cowboys on Horseback Attempting to Seize Back Cattle Stolen by the Rustlers/Feds

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
April 12, 2014

BLM federal agents are threatening to shoot Cliven Bundy supporters who are attempting to seize back stolen cattle as a showdown looms.

Go to 3:39 in the video to learn about the feds’ threatening to shoot people.

Despite the fact that the Bureau of Land Management has backed down and announced it will cease its operation to round up Bundy’s cattle, the rancher gave Gillespie a one hour time limit to seize all firearms from BLM agents involved in the siege.

Video footage from the scene in Bunkerville shows hundreds of cowboys on horseback, with supporters now vowing to take back hundreds of cattle the feds have already stolen from Bundy.

View image on Twitter

Infowars reporter David Knight is at the center of the scene and says he clearly heard BLM federal agents threaten to shoot men, women and children.

Police are now blocking roads and demanding that hundreds of Bundy supporters turn back as tensions mount.

SWAT teams are also in place.

Some are now reporting that BLM have pulled out of the area and police are allowing vehicles to pass.

The Las Vegas Review Journal is reporting that the BLM has agreed to completely cave and release all the cattle they rounded up.



BLM Backs Down: Sen. Reid-Big Chinese Energy Land Grab Vs Bundy Family Ranch

FAA Designates Bundy Ranch a No-Fly Zone

Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy

If the Feds Take Your Cattle and Property, YOU Become

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better

Range War – Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better Have Funeral Plans” – “inbred bastards” – said we should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”


Watch – Live stream link working on an IPAD and batteries:

This feed is saying that there wasn’t a threat to kill the people present and the cell towers haven’t been taken down as reported above…the local cops per this reporter states the local cops are on the side of the people…he also condems the above reporting…(MC->will continue to monitor both – time permitting)…


The thousands of people present will listen only to the State of Nevada. They refuse to listen to the BLM Feds-US Government/Globalists who should have nothing to do with this land. Since the feds banned the air there are no news reports from the National media  at this time – blackout – censorship…


Harry Reid and his accomplices are in deep trouble. They’d better pray that nothing ontoward happens  here…as should we all.


Excellent link w/ a good collection of links/videos: nebraska attitude

Good summary here w/ links: dan miller panama

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

BLM Backs Down: Sen. Reid-Big Chinese Energy Land Grab Vs Bundy Family Ranch


4. 12. 2014 Cliven Bundy and his wife standing for the National Anthem…


Bundy Ranch 3 days ago Source


Matt Finn FNC@MattFinnFNC

BREAKING: BLM backs down in per Clark County Sheriff

A day after Infowars blew the lid on Sen. Harry Reid’s link to the BLM’s land grab of the Bundy Ranch, the Sheriff of Clark County, Nevada, Douglas Gillespie, announced to tremendous applause that the Bureau of Land Management would cease their efforts targeting cattle rancher Cliven Bundy.

In an emotional response, Bundy told the Sheriff he had one hour to disarm the federal agency, to bring the arms to the platform where speeches were made this morning, and to take down their barricades.

Last Saturday, the BLM, with the aid of helicopters, low-flying aircraft and hired cowboys, began rounding up Bundy’s cattle, and forbade him from interfering with the operation, as Bundy announced he was prepared to weather a full-on assault.

The sheriff’s announcement coincided with a press release put out by the BLM today stating that they would back off due to “serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public.”

The people ignored this area.

From the director of the BLM, Neil Kornze:

“As we have said from the beginning of the gather to remove illegal cattle from federal land consistent with court orders, a safe and peaceful operation is our number one priority. After one week, we have made progress in enforcing two recent court orders to remove the trespass cattle from public lands that belong to all Americans.

“Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public.

“We ask that all parties in the area remain peaceful and law-abiding as the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service work to end the operation in an orderly manner.

Ranching has always been an important part of our nation’s heritage and continues throughout the West on public lands that belong to all Americans. This is a matter of fairness and equity, and we remain disappointed that Cliven Bundy continues to not comply with the same laws that 16,000 public lands ranchers do every year. After 20 years and multiple court orders to remove the trespass cattle, Mr. Bundy owes the American taxpayers in excess of $1 million. The BLM will continue to work to resolve the matter administratively and judicially.”

The BLM did not mention giving Bundy his cattle back, but he hadn’t asked for them, he asked for his freedom back and for the BLM to lay down their arms. Source


Watch – Live stream link:


The Godfather of the Arizona Mafia, Senator Harry Reid, made it go away before the Corporate Media was forced to report on how his son and Big Chinese Energy needed that land for their billion dollar solar investment. Don’t expect it to end here, they will regroup and try to go in under the radar next time. These people don’t give up. We’ve had a close-up demonstration  and know for sure now that the BLM feds are a wing of the Globalists.


Now Harry Reid, his sons, and other accomplices will have to figure out how to stay out of prison!!!!! First he needs to be Recalled for his abuse of power!!!


PS: 5000 people had already gathered at the Bundy Ranch…



FAA Designates Bundy Ranch a No-Fly Zone

Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy

If the Feds Take Your Cattle and Property, YOU Become

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better

Range War – Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better Have Funeral Plans” – “inbred bastards” – said we should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”


Bottomline: The BLM (Federal aka UN aka Globalists including reigning and non-reigning Royal Monarchs) have been serving to provide collateral for foreign debt for decades and now it seems - the foreign holders of those notes want more than just a piece of paper – they want access to the land they own!!!

A Charter is a piece of paper. A Royal Charter is a piece of paper. Treaties are pieces of paper these corrupt representatives of ours signed. The money they print is also a piece of paper. They’ve been stealing the real money from us since time began – when the implemented usuary was the nail in our coffin. I say get rid of the paper money, forgive each other our debts, and get back to a non-usuary system.

Is this land grabbing happening in a country near you? Yes! Agenda 21…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

VIDEO: Depopulation and You

Published on Jun 24, 2013 Worth watching.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Weaponization of Western “Aid” for Syria

11.04.2014 Author: Tony Cartalucci

5754The UN and the United States have laid blame squarely on the Syrian government for blocking international aid convoys from reaching victims of Syria’s ongoing conflict.

The BBC in its article, “Syria crisis: UN says no aid improvement despite vote,” claimed:

The UN has said that there has been no humanitarian improvement for millions of Syrians since the Security Council passed a resolution last month to increase aid deliveries.

UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos said that much of the blame lay with President Bashar al-Assad’s government. She accused it of an arbitrary and unjustified refusal to grant aid convoys access to remoter areas. Baroness Amos said violence, including sexual violence, continued to increase.The Syrian government has yet to respond to her allegations but has consistently argued that it is doing its utmost to get food and medical supplies to people in less accessible areas. In February, the Security Council called on all parties to allow aid to cross conflict lines and borders.

However, what the UN and the US have both failed to mention is the disingenuous intentions, means, and methods behind these so-called “aid convoys” attempting to reach “people in less accessible areas.” These would be areas held by foreign-backed militants, including members of the US State Department designated terrorist organization, Jabhat Al Nusra – Al Qaeda’s Syrian franchise and guilty of some of the worst atrocities carried out during the conflict real or imagined on either side.

To see how “arbitrary and unjustified” the Syrian government’s refusals are to grant access to remote areas controlled by terrorists by Western “aid convoys,” one must consider emerging evidence regarding the nature of these so-called convoys and the general practice of the West sending relief into a conflict of their own design.

Aid as “Trojan Horses”

It was in confirmed leaked e-mails exposed by the Syrian Electronic Army that first established the use of Western “aid” ships to ferry militants to and from battlefields in both Libya and Syria. American contractor Matthew Van Dyke, while speaking to Western journalists, admitted that he was preparing to take a “free” aid ship from Libya to Turkey where militants have been staging, receiving cash and arms, and being transported to the Syrian border by NATO for 3 years now. Van Dyke and his company – being armed militants – traveling by way of aid ships should (and has) raise serious concern among the international community regarding the abuse of what are supposed to be humanitarian missions.

Other stories like Alakhbar English’s “Qatar Red Crescent Funds Syrian Rebel Arms,” also raises alarm regarding so-called “aid” flowing into Syria specifically to help those fighting the government.

The article reports:

Sources in the investigation team said that Mahmoud confessed to receiving around $2.2 million from Khaled Diab, a Qatar Red Crescent official. He was then to hand the money over to a Lebanese cleric identified as O.O., born in 1983 and affiliated with Muslims Without Borders, in the Bekaa village of Bar Elias.

“Through the cleric, Mahmoud was able to acquire 30 RPG launchers for $900,000 and 300 shells for $300,000, which were then transferred to Syria by a smuggler known as Anwar or his nom de guerre Abu Salah.” The smuggler then handed over the weapons to the Syrian national known as Abu Abdullah in the Damascus countryside.

Mahmoud also bought 100 Kalashnikovs and an ammunitions cache for $40,000 from the Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp in southern Lebanon. The source added that Mahmoud entered the refugee camp with the Syrian national Mohammad Abdullah, known as Abu Hamza, under the guise of distributing humanitarian aid to refugees from Syria.

Both Russia’s Pravda and Iran’s Press TV carried similar stories involving Turkish ambulances being used to smuggle weapons into Syria. And while many will question the veracity of these claims considering both Russia and Iran’s relationship with Syria, together with Van Dyke’s leaked e-mails and more recent stories emanating from Western sources, it appears that systematic abuse of humanitarian aid destined for Syria is indeed a reality.

Most recently, the UK’s official Charity Commission warned in a post titled, “Syria and aid convoys – regulatory alert,” that:

The Charity Commission, the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales, is issuing this alert to charities as regulatory advice under section 15(2) of the Charities Act 2011 – it is particularly relevant for trustees of charities and charitable appeals which are organising or participating in humanitarian aid convoys to assist those affected by the Syria Crisis (“the Crisis”).

Recent media coverage has reported that a suspected British suicide bomber in Syria had travelled there as part of a humanitarian convoy. The Commission has and continues to be alert to the potential abuse of humanitarian aid efforts through facilitating travel for individuals for other purposes particularly to conflict zones where terrorist groups are known to operate or exert control.

There is a risk that charitable aid convoys to Syria may be abused for non-charitable purposes and facilitating travel for British foreign fighters. This is of serious regulatory concern to the Commission and impacts on public trust and confidence in those charities responding to the Crisis and the charitable sector more generally.

Trustees of charities and charitable appeals providing humanitarian support need to carefully consider whether organising and/or participating in a convoy is really the most effective way to deliver aid to those in need.

Despite the candor of the Charity Commission – otherwise nonexistent across the rest of the UK’s political landscape – the Western media has chosen to remain silent on an issue that the Commission itself recognizes as a threat to both public trust and confidence. Russia’s RT would go on to cover the Commission’s well-warranted concerns in a video short titled, Trojan Horses: Aid convoys help young Islamist fighters go to Syrian warzone.”

It appears that both the Syrian government and the UK’s Charity Commission are in agreement regarding whether “organising and/or participating in a convoy is really the most effective way to deliver aid to those in need,” – particularly convoys originating in nations that have created and are intentionally perpetuating the crisis in Syria in the first place.

The West Has Created Syria’s Catastrophe and is Using Aid as a Weapon

It was in Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh’s 2007 article, “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?” that prophetically stated (emphasis added):

“To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.”

In 2011, these efforts aimed at arming and enabling sectarian militants to overthrow the Syrian government would begin in earnest. The corporate-funded think tanks that have engineered this geopolitical campaign have openly stated their desire to “bleed” Syria with protracted violence. The United States has admittedly been arming militants along Syria’s borders since at least 2012 according to the New York Times in their article, C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition.”

Alleviating the suffering of the Syrian people was never the West’s goal. Since at least as early as 2007, the goal was regime change, and even then, apparently at any cost considering their stated willingness to arm militants tied to Al Qaeda. The goal to this day remains regime change – and to that end, “humanitarian aid,” in addition to being used as cover to smuggle in weapons and fighters, will also be used as a weapon against the Syrian government.

By applying sanctions to the Syrian government, the West has only succeeded in harming the Syrian people, leaving the government it was supposedly targeting relatively unscathed. This was demonstrated earlier in Iraq during the many years it was sanctioned, leaving both the military and the leadership strong and prepared for war while literally half a million children died of disease or malnutrition.

The effect in Syria is similar. The LA Times appeared to revel in the effects of biting sanctions imposed upon the Syrian people. In its report, “Sanctions against Syria hurting, Assad regime concedes,” it stated:

In an unusual acknowledgement of the pain inflicted by Western sanctions, Syria’s oil minister said Wednesday that U.S. and European curbs on its oil trade have cost the regime $4 billion and caused widespread shortages of cooking fuel and other essentials.

The concession by Oil Minister Sufian Allaw that “oppressive European and U.S. sanctions” were taking their toll surprised Middle East analysts. The government of embattled President Bashar Assad has sought to downplay the 15-month-old uprising as an annoyance provoked by outside forces.

The sanctions are designed specifically to reduce or eliminate the ability of the government to provide for its people. The “humanitarian aid,” funneled through opposition groups and into opposition held territory is designed specifically to allow the opposition to provide for people purposefully reduced to desperation and dependence via devastating conflict and accompanying sanctions.

This is revealed in the West’s own think tank policy papers and in editorial columns found across the Western media. In particular, in a Boston Herald’s op-ed titled, “Rubin: U.S. must arm rebels to save besieged Syrians,” it states (emphasis added):

During talks in Geneva in January and February, the regime let some food in, letting thousands of residents return. But as soon as the talks ended, Assad stopped the humanitarian aid convoys.

“I know the United States is one of the main donors,” Zakaria told me, “but the aid is going to organizations that work under the regime, which gives him (Assad) more cards to force civilians or rebels to surrender. They should find a way to get the aid into besieged towns.”

Qusai Zakarya is of course, a public relations officer working directly for the so-called “Syrian opposition and his comments represent the basic principles of wresting control of a country away from an established political order and handing it over to another – covered in depth by various US counterinsurgency manuals. The idea is clearly to use aid as a means of taking those “cards” mentioned by Zakarya from the Syrian government, and handing them to the opposition – not the immediate alleviation of human suffering, but the use of that pretext to further the geopolitical agenda of the West in Syria.

What’s Next For Syrians?

Syria itself, its allies, and activists around the world must shine more light on the suffering the Syrian people are enduring through the intentional destruction of their economy. This destruction has been exacted through both the West’s premeditated and intentionally perpetuated attempt to violently overthrow the Syrian government, and the sanctions they have imposed upon the Syrian people. They have done this to intentionally create a desperate, dependent population that they hope will submit to a new pro-Western client regime.

While the West has created a torrent of propaganda fronts to justify its ongoing, full spectrum assault on Syria, including economic warfare, Syria and its allies must counter this with truthful reports and media projects that will have a stronger appeal to an increasingly distrustful public that has grown weary of the West’s extraterritorial adventures.

For independent activists and humanitarian aid workers worldwide, the West’s abuse of aid to augment its foreign meddling should be a cause for great alarm. The UK’s Charity Commission should not stand alone in its concern regarding the abuse of humanitarian aid. Such abuse does indeed stands to threaten the public’s trust and confidence in all humanitarian endeavors. A distrustful public that has no confidence in the traditional brokers of humanitarian aid will search elsewhere to invest their time, energy, and income – leaving aid organizations in perpetual decline. Restoring that trust and confidence will require both the exposure of abuse, and steps taken to rectify it.

Approaching the Syrian government directly with aid, and providing oversight on the ground to assess efforts to distribute it would be a positive first step. Working with nations that have demonstrably shown a desire to end the conflict, rather than perpetuate or even expand it until their desired “political transitions” take place would also be necessary.

While many humanitarian aid groups feel “tied” to the West – as the West’s designs unravel in Syria and irreversible decline begins, those “tied” to these special interests will be dragged with them. Sorting out the abuses of humantarian aid destined for Syria is therefore not just a literal matter of survival for the Syrian people, but also an organizational matter of survival for the aid groups involved.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

FAA Designates Bundy Ranch a No-Fly Zone

BLM attempts a media blackout with FAA flight restrictions targeting news helicopters

Kit Daniels
April 12, 2014

Yesterday afternoon the Federal Aviation Administration designated the airspace above Bundy Ranch near Bunkerville, Nevada a “no-fly zone” with altitude restrictions that effectively ban news helicopters.

The BLM "no-fly zone" is targeting news helicopters covering the story. Original photo credit: Peter Clarke / Wiki

The “temporary flight restrictions,” revealed by a contributor to the Free Republic, bans all air traffic under an altitude of 3,000 feet in the vicinity of the ranch except for aircraft operating under the direction of the Bureau of Land Management.

The restrictions in full:


A map of the no-fly zone is available here.

Undoubtedly these flight restrictions are in response to the intense media presence now surrounding Bundy Ranch.

“Keeps the media choppers away so the BLM can do what it wants,” a contributor named SkyDancer pointed out on the Free Republic.

It’s quite obvious that this is the case considering that news helicopters routinely fly at an altitude under 3,000 feet in order to capture the best footage.

Recently, cowboys who are supportive of Cliven Bundy have been successful at rounding up Bundy’s cattle before the BLM could impound them, so it certainly appears that the agency is using the flight restrictions as a cover to target these cowboys without any fear of potential brutality being leaked to the media.

BLM agents have already assaulted several protestors, including a pregnant woman and a cancer victim, which was fortunately caught on tape.

The feds are attempting to regain control of the narrative surrounding the standoff, especially since it is now known that U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is behind the land grab for the future development of solar farms with Chinese energy companies.

It is also concerning that by interpreting the no-fly zone to the letter, the BLM could even delay medical helicopters from flying into the area to evacuate individuals who are severely injured.

Although air ambulances are typically exempt from temporary flight restrictions, pilots are still supposed to gain clearance before taking off, which in the past has kept medical pilots grounded until permission was granted.

This scenario is especially frightening considering Clark Co. Commissioner Tom Collins’ recent statement that those traveling to Bunkerville to support Bundy in his standoff against the feds “better have funeral plans.”  Source



Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy

If the Feds Take Your Cattle and Property, YOU Become

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better

Range War – Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff

Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better Have Funeral Plans” – “inbred bastards” – said we should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

9 Priceless Artifacts Museums Should Return to Their Home Countries

9, priceless, artifacts, museums, should, return, to, their, home, countries, 9 Priceless Artifacts Museums Should Return to Their Home Countries Image Credit: Facebook

“This belongs to Iraq,” reads the poster held by Iraqi student Zeidoun Alkinani at the Babylonian Ishtar Gate in the Pergamon Museum of Berlin.

Excavated and acquired by German archaeologists in what is today Iraq, the Ishtar Gate is one of the many artifacts shipped back to Western countries prior to World War I as part of a larger trend by European colonists across the Middle East. In 2002, Iraqi officials urged Germany to return the gate.

There are still no plans made for its return. The viral image does, however, bring to light the long-argued debate between museums in the U.S. and Europe over ownership of ancient artifacts and the objects’ countries of origin.

Excavation site of Ishtar Gate in the 1930s.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of priceless historical artifacts have long been stolen, traded, sold and passed through numerous hands only to be spirited away across multiple borders to private collectors in a black market estimated to be worth as much as $6.3 billion a year.The question of ownership and the process of identifying and then returning museum stolen artifacts to their country of origin is extremely murky. Despite the tempting idea of following the rule “finder’s keepers,” priceless treasures and cultural heritage artifacts belong in their countries of origin — especially if they were stolen or acquired in dubious circumstances — once it’s been proven that the country of origin has the necessary resources to preserve and maintain the artifact.Here are some of the world’s most disputed artifacts that countries are still fighting over:

1. Rosetta Stone, Egypt

Via: Singaporean in London

Discovered in Rosetta, Egypt by a French officer in 1799, this 2,200-year-old black basalt stone is now a famous artifact is inscribed in hieroglyphic, demotic and Greek and is believed to hold the key to deciphering hieroglyphics and Egypt’s past. The stone was acquired by the British when they defeated the French in 1801, and transferred it to the British Museum in London in 1802. Although Egypt has continued to push for the stone’s return, the British Museum refuses to budge.


2. Elgin Marbles, Greece

Parthenon marbles

Via: The Telegraph

This collection of ancient Greek marble statues, also known as the Parthenon Marbles, has long been the source of a raging debate between Greece and the British Museum. The priceless relics were removed from Athens by British envoy Lord Elgin when he was ambassador to the Ottoman Empire in the early 19th century. It has remained a prized possession of the British Museum since 1816.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron, however, has so far opposed calls to return the Marbles, saying the sculptures are a vital part of the museum’s displays. Even UNESCO has intervened and requested both countries to “‘join in mediation”‘ to resolve the long-running dispute.

“They symbolise the very foundation of Greek and European culture, one which is of universal significance,” said Greek European Parliament member Rodi Kratssta. “The dismembered sculptures offend our common European heritage and its perception worldwide.”

3. Koh-i-Noor Diamond, India

Via: Huffington Post

Meaning “mountain of light” in Urdu, the Koh-i-Noor diamond was seized by the British Empire’s East India Company as one of the spoils of war in the colonial era. Britain’s then colonial governor-general of India arranged for the diamond to be presented to Queen Victoria in 1850. One of the largest diamonds in the world, the 105-carat diamond has been set in the crown of the current Queen Elizabeth’s late mother and is on display in the Tower of London.

Despite India’s demands for its return “in atone for Britain’s colonial past,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said the diamond will not be returned. “I certainly don’t believe in ‘returnism’, as it were. I don’t think that’s sensible,” Cameron said. “It’s the same question with the Elgin Marbles and all these other things.”

4. Nefertiti Bust, Egypt

 Via: ABC News

Despite Egypt’s driven campaign to reclaim more than 5,000 artifacts from around the world, a German foundation rejected on Monday the Egyptians’ request to return the 3,400-year-old bust of Queen Nefertiti, the star attraction of the Egyptian collection at the Neues Museum in Berlin, drawing more than 1 million viewers every year.

“The foundation’s position on the return of Nefertiti remains unchanged,” Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation President Professor Hermann Parzinger said. “She is and remains the ambassador of Egypt in Berlin.”

The bust was discovered by German archaeologist Ludwig Borchardt in 1912 and was taken to Germany the following year. Although Egypt has persistently requested the return of Nefertiti to Egypt since 1930, Germany has ruled out returning the ancient bust claiming that the statue is too delicate to make the long trip home.


Old fisherman statue from the Hadrianic baths of Aphrodisias. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.

Germany returned the old fisherman statue from the Hadrianic baths of Aphrodisias. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.

“Artifacts, just like people, animals or plants, have souls and historical memories,” said Turkey’s Culture Minister Ertugrul Gunay, who is part of an aggressive Turkish campaign to reclaim its antiquities from some of the world’s largest museums including the Met, the Louvre, and the Pergamon. “When they are repatriated to their countries, the balance of nature will be restored.”

One of the artifacts in question — the more than 2000-year-old marble torso called “Old Fisherman from Aphrodisias,” which is currently housed in Berlin’s Pergamon Museum — has also been requested, but German authorities have so far refused to budge.

“The piece arrived here in 1904 as part of an old collection of antiquities,” said Hermann Parzinger, president of the Foundation of Prussian Cultural Heritage. “It was bought from an art market, it was absolutely legal and we can prove it. We see no reason at all which would justify returning it.”

6. Sion Treasure, Turkey

Via  Michael Tinkler Ancient 6th century Byzantine liturgical silverware and other decorative objects known as the Sion Treasure are also among the many items Turkey is seeking to recover from Dumbarton Oaks in Washington D.C., a research institute owned by Harvard University.

Reportedly found in an ancient burial mound in Kumulca, Turkey in the 1960s, the treasure was acquired by the museum in 1966 from a private collector who bought them from George Zakos, a dealer with documented ties to the black market trade in antiquities. Turkey has been requesting the return of the objects since 1968 to reunite them with the rest of the treasure displayed in a museum in Antalya, Turkey.

7. Iraqi Jewish artifacts, Iraq

  • Thousands of books, personal papers and sacred texts taken from Iraqi Jews were found in the flooded basement of Saddam Husseins intelligence service headquarters in Baghdad in spring 2003. Above, a librarian holds one of the texts at the U.S. National Archives.
  • Thousands of books, personal papers and sacred exts taken from Iraqi Jews… (Alex Brandon / Associated…)
    Via: LA Times

    The scholar Harold Rhode found thousands of moldy artifacts of Iraq’s ancient and mostly dispersed Jewish population in the flooded basement of Saddam Hussein’s service headquarters in Baghdad with the U.S. invasion force in 2003. He is now fighting to prevent his findings from being returned to the Iraqi government.

    Likening the return to “giving the personal effects of Jews killed in the Holocaust back to Germany,” Rhode has even launched a campaign to halt the transfer and is supported by several American Jewish groups and members of Congress arguing that the findings belong to Iraqi Jews and not the Iraqi government.

    Currently on display at the National Archives in Washington through Jan. 5, the pieces include a 400-year-old Hebrew Bible, a Torah scroll fragment that includes parts of the Book of Genesis, a Zohar from 1815, a Babylonian Talmud from 1793, a lunar calendar in Hebrew and Arabic from 1972-3 and other books, personal papers, and sacred texts.

    8. Imperial treasures, China

    Via: Zimbio

    British Prime Minister PM David Cameron recently faced demands from Chinese state-run media and internet users to return of 23,000 priceless artifacts looted from Beijing in the 19th century that now lie in the British Museum.

    Britain was part of the Eight-Nation Alliance that put down the Boxer Rebellion in the late 19th century, ransacked the Forbidden City, and destroyed the Old Summer Palace in Beijing in 1860.

    “You can scarcely imagine the beauty and magnificence of the places we burnt. It made one’s heart sore to burn them,” wrote one British officer at the time. “It made one’s heart sore to burn them.”

    The Department for Culture, Media & Sport in London said, “Questions concerning Chinese items in museum collections are for the trustees or governing authorities of those collections to respond to and the Government does not intervene.”

    Britain, however, has continued to reject requests to return artifacts from other countries while the British Museum argues that these treasures “are world heritage objects and are more accessible to visitors in London.”


    Turkey who won’t even recognize the in the Armenian Genocide?! Turkey whose still murdering Armenians and other Christians?! NO! The Armenians who survived the Genocide ended up in places like Kessab. Today Turkey is murdering their decendants and once more responsible for displacing over two thousand of them. Turkey has iron balls when they’re looking to loot the Sion Christian Treasure which belongs to the Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Chaldeon Catholics… They ethnically cleansed the country of millions of Christians, stole their homes, business’, land, jewellry… and their greatest treasures of all – their mothers, fathers, brothers sisters, aunts, uncles….by chopping their heads off, hanging them from trees, raping and starving them to death. They can go scrambles eggs!!! Those priceless artefacts belong to the Church to be used in our Holy Mass and not sitting in any museum either! The Turks have shown no respect, even in recent times toward their past history, hundreds of beautiful ancient Churches are being left in ruins. Screw them!!! (No offense intended to the regular Turkish people)

    The Indian Koh-i-Noor Diamond should be returned to India immediately. The Hope Diamond is also said to be from India? Queen Victoria watching English-Scottish settlers dancing during the Great Famine while the Irish starved to death. The Jewish people should get their Holy Bibles. All other artefacts, should be returned to the countries from which they were stolen along with the thousands more stashed in their mansions unless they were legally purchased under international law and can prove ownership. Just my opinion…no offense intended to the regular English people. The plundering  excursions by the Monarchs and Royal Chartered Companies benefited only themselves. Today is just another chapter, another time, another method, same people, same results.


    Related -

    Turkey’s Latest Jihad on Christian Armenians (Kessab)

    The Armenian Genocide (Warning: gruesome pictures

    Armenian church in eastern Turkey becomes hayloft after

    Ruined Site of the Old Armenian City of Ani (Turkey)

    ‘Treasure of Benghazi’ Stolen in One of the Biggest Heists in Archaeological History

    Libya: Archaeological Plunder, Robbery and Vandalism (follow-up)

    Ancient Egyptian Artifacts on E-bay?

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Clarke Co. Commissioner Threatens Ranchers: “Better Have Funeral Plans” – “inbred bastards” – said we should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”

    War of words over standoff with feds intensifies

    Paul Joseph Watson
    April 11, 2014

    Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins has caused outrage by remarking that Utahns planning to travel to Nevada to support Cliven Bundy in his standoff against the feds “better have funeral plans”.

    Image: Tom Collins (YouTube).

    The comments were revealed by Darin Bushman, a Piute County, Utah, commissioner after he spoke with Collins about Utah ranchers and his colleagues on the County Commission complaining about tactics used by Bureau of Land Management agents during their seizure of Bundy’s cattle in southern Nevada.

    “I was just told by commissioner Collins of Clark County NV that all of us folks from Utah are a bunch of “inbred bastards” and if we are coming to Clark Cointy NV to support Cliven Bundy we all “better have funeral plans”. We should “turn our asses around on mind our own f-ing business”. Now there’s some classy leadership for you,” wrote Bushman on his official Facebook page.

    After the story was picked up by the Las Vegas Review Journal, Bushman responded to the controversy by posting on Facebook, “I guess I’ve made an enemy in Las Vegas.” The commissioner also lambasted Clark County Sheriff Douglas Gillespie as being, “too spineless to exercise his Jurisdiction”. Earlier this week, Cliven Bundy called on Sheriff Gillespie to start arresting BLM feds on charges of trespassing and theft.

    Collins’ remarks were made in the context of him fearing that protests against the BLM could turn violent, which is ironic given that the only person invoking direct violence is Collins himself.

    bundy 300x100 Coalition of Western State Legislators, Sheriffs, and Veterans Stand Vigil in Support of Embattled Nevada Rancher, Cliven Bundy ‘To Prevent Another Ruby Ridge or Waco”

    “I’m trying to do everything I can to discourage anybody who tells me they’re coming here with loaded guns,” Collins said. “I’m going to tell them not to come,” adding, “The Bundys want peace, they don’t want any violence going on so all these gun-packing folks just need to go home.”

    Clark County commissioners will hold a meeting next week to discuss issues of decorum in response to Collins’ comments. It is unclear whether or not any action will be taken against him.

    Bushman questioned Collins’ sanity in light of his offensive comments.

    “This guy was just off-the-hook weird,” he said. “I’ve never ran into a fellow commissioner who treated me like that.” Source


    Hundreds of cowboys from Utah are joining the ranchers. And a Harry Reid democrat commissioner threatened them – now he’s put himself in the crosshairs of the whole thing if anything happens. What an idiot. All it takes is a spark to light a fuse.


    The auctioneer got $600,000 from BLM (tax dollars from thee and me)to auction off Bundy’s cattle, but he got so much heat from other ranchers he reniged on the deal. I’m wondering where are all the horse loving PETA people – the ones who have the horses in NYC bedding down on mattress’s.  Don’t get me wrong – love horses but I smell some hypocrisy. Probably because these hypocrites get funding from the bankster-gangsters.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

    Eric Holder Plays Race Card As Obama Admin. Collapses

    Kurt Nimmo
    April 11, 2014

    In a calculated effort to test the historical and political amnesia of the American public and simultaneously play a frayed race card, Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, has decried his treatment at the hands of a House Judiciary Committee hearing earlier in the week.

    Published on Apr 11, 2014 – April 11, 2014 Al Jazeera News

    MSNBC frames the meme: it’s all about race.

    The Obama administration continually plays the race card when confronted with political opposition and accusations of impropriety.

    Holder asked “what attorney general has had to deal with that kind of treatment?” following a pointed exchange with Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican.

    “I realize that contempt is not a big deal to our attorney general, but it is important that we have proper oversight,” Gohmert remarked as Holder weathered questions about the Justice Department’s stonewalling of handing over documents related to the prosecution of a Texas-based Islamic charity.

    Although not specifically stated, Holder accused Gohmert and the Republicans of picking on him due to the color of his skin. This was underscored by the fact he complained about his treatment while attending Al Sharpton’s National Action Network.

    In fact, a large number of federal government bureaucrats, including former Attorney General Janet Reno, have weathered contempt of Congress charges with far less theatrics.

    Since 1975, these have included a Secretary of State; a Secretary of Commerce; a Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare; a couple Secretaries of Energy; a Secretary of the Interior; various officials of the EPA; a White House Counsel and a White House Chief of Staff. On Thursday, the House Oversight Committee added to this list of ignobility by voting to hold former IRS Director of Tax Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress.

    Congress: Eric Holder should be in jail. posted by infowars.

    In 1975, Nixon’s former Attorney General, John Mitchell, endured a far worse fate than Eric Holder ever will – he was sentenced to two and a half to eight years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and cover-up. Mitchell’s sentence was subsequently reduced and he served 19 months before he was released on parole for medical reasons.

    Mitchell’s crimes of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury, however, pale in comparison to Eric Holder’s criminal complicity at the Justice Department. Florida Republican Rep. Allen West and others have pointed to Holder’s attempt to subvert a congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious and Project Gunrunner. Fast and Furious led to a number of murders.

    Holder’s tiff while questioned before the House Judiciary Committee amply demonstrates the continued collapse of the Obama administration – from Obama’s willful violations of the Constitution to an extraordinary number of scandals from Fast and Furious to the IRS political hit squad – and it also demonstrates the threat such an unprecedented crash and burn represents.

    Exposure of this level of political and criminal corruption may ultimately set the stage for a false flag event engineered not only to save Obama, but his global elite puppet masters as well.


    Note who posted the video from MSNBC – Al Jazeera News - one of the branches of the Muslim Brotherhood. They’re a mouthpiece for their owners in Bahrain - Obama and Hillary Clinton couldn’t have pulled off their “April Spring Revolution” Wealth Heist without them. Hillary Clinton visited Al Jazeera when she was in Bahrain just prior to the heist (the Taliban has an office in their building). Al-Jazeera got into this country only on account of their valuable help in fooling the people of the ME!!!!


    Race isn’t going to help them anymore though one can see how it might intimidate someone in Congress who represents a diverse distrinct. And as for Eric Holder – he should be in jail already for all the stuff  he’s pulled!!! And Obama should be impeached for the same thing!!!


    PS: MSNBC has about ten viewers anyway. heh Wonder how pays to keep them live?

    I just checked – it’s General Electric who got lots of environmental very sweet deals from the Obama Regime.

     These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America (the illusion of choice)


    All that being said my gut tells me the Administration and Corporists will instigate  a civil war using similiar tactics – not unlike Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Africa, Thailand, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria and so on…only here it’ll be a race war which is why they selected Obama and it’s why they left the borders open while almost strip searching us at airports. The same thing will happen in Europe.


    Today is just another chapter, another time, another method, same people, same results.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Panic After Chinese City Declares Tap Water Toxic

    Tom Phillips
    The Telegraph
    April 11, 2014

    People line up to buy cartons of bottled water at a supermarket after reports on heavy levels of benzene in local tap water

    People line up to buy cartons of bottled water at a supermarket after reports on heavy levels of benzene in local tap water Photo: REUTERS

    Waterpoison1Nearly 2.5 million residents of a major city in west China have been ordered not to drink its tap water after the supply was contaminated with dangerous levels of a carcinogenic substance.

    Panic buying of bottled water broke out in Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu province, on Friday after state media announced authorities had “detected excessive levels of benzene in [its] tap water system”.

    Officials found 200 micrograms of benzene per litre – 20 times the acceptable “national limit” – in samples of the city’s water supply, according to reports.

    Exposure to benzene, a colourless liquid used to make plastics, lubricants, dyes, detergents and pesticides, has been linked to leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

    “Consuming foods or fluids contaminated with high levels of benzene can cause vomiting, stomach irritation, dizziness, sleepiness, convulsions, and rapid heart rate. In extreme cases, inhaling or swallowing very high levels of benzene can be deadly,” the website of the American Cancer Society warns.

    It was not immediately clear how Lanzhou’s water supply had been contaminated but Xinhua, China’s official news agency, blamed an unnamed chemical plant. The plant had released toxic “waste water” into the city’s supply, Xinhua said.

    The Yellow River, which cuts through the heart of Lanzhou, a city of nearly four million inhabitants, had not been contaminated, government sources claimed.

    The announcement that Lanzhou’s residents should avoid drinking tap water triggered panic, with locals “rushing to supermarkets or community grocery stores to stock up on bottled water”, Xinhua reported.

    “My family are all scared,” one woman, named only as Ms Luo, told the agency as she filled her trolley with water at one of Lanzhou’s biggest supermarkets. “My husband called to ask me to come here and snap up as much bottled water as I can.”

    Photographs showed shoppers heaping crates of mineral water into their trolleys.

    The water supply to one part of the city, the Xigu district, was completely cut off, according to the state-run China News Service.

    Shi Zifa, a chemistry professor from Lanzhou University, said drinking contaminated water could cause “acute poisoning”.

    City officials said they would issue updates on the water’s drinkability every two hours.

    Wang Zuguo, a resident, took to the Weibo micro-blog to vent his anger. “It is unprecedented for the capital city of a province to see its tap water so badly polluted that it becomes unsuitable for drinking,” he wrote. “How are several million people supposed to survive on bottled water?” “If we can’t drink tap water, what are we supposed to drink?” wrote another internet user. “Lanzhou has several million people, so how is “don’t drink it” a solution? What happens to those who can’t buy bottled water? Do they have to go somewhere else to drink and eat? Or are they expected to live on air alone?” China’s toxic skies make greater headlines but authorities are also battling a major water pollution crisis after decades of breakneck development.

    In 2012 the country’s rivers pumped more than 17 million tons of pollution into its seas, according to official figures, including 46,000 tons of heavy metals.

    In February, Beijing said it would spend 2 trillion yuan (£192 billion) on a water pollution campaign in a bid to improve water quality by “30 to 50 percent”. Nearly 60 per cent of groundwater samples were “heavily polluted”, to a 2012 study found.

    The big issue is power, the world is literally covered in water. There’s a desalination plant in El Paso that can produce 11 million gallons of fresh water a day by forcing it through filters. It is amazing technology, but you need power.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

    Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy Ranch

    BLM attempted cover-up of Sen. Reid/Chinese gov’t takeover of ranch for solar farm

    Kit Daniels
    April 11, 2014

    The Bureau of Land Management, whose Director was Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) former senior adviser, has purged documents from its web site stating that the agency wants Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle off of the land his family has worked for over 140 years in order to make way for solar panel power stations.

    Corrupt Democratic Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) working with the Chinese gov't to take land from hard-working Americans.

    Deleted from but reposted for posterity by the Free Republic, the BLM document entitled “Cattle Trespass Impacts” directly states that Bundy’s cattle “impacts” solar development, more specifically the construction of “utility-scale solar power generation facilities” on “public lands.”

    “Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle,” the document states.

    Another BLM report entitled Regional Mitigation Strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone (BLM Technical Note 444) reveals that Bundy’s land in question is within the “Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone and surrounding area” which is part of a broad U.S. Department of Energy program for “Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States” on land “managed” by BLM.

    “In 2012, the BLM and the U.S. Department of Energy published the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States,” the report reads. “The Final Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement assessed the impact of utility-scale solar energy development on public lands in the six southwestern states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.”

    “The Approved Resource Management Plan Amendments/Record of Decision (ROD) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States implemented a comprehensive solar energy program for public lands in those states and incorporated land use allocations and programmatic and SEZ-specific design features into land use plans in the six-state study area.”

    In 2012, the New American reported that Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid, was the chief representative for a Chinese energy firm planning to build a $5-billion solar plant on public land in Laughlin, Nevada.

    And journalist Marcus Stern with Reuters also reported that Sen. Reid was heavily involved in the deal as well.

    “[Reid] and his oldest son, Rory, are both involved in an effort by a Chinese energy giant, ENN Energy Group, to build a $5 billion solar farm and panel manufacturing plant in the southern Nevada desert,” he wrote. “Reid has been one of the project’s most prominent advocates, helping recruit the company during a 2011 trip to China and applying his political muscle on behalf of the project in Nevada.”

    “His son, a lawyer with a prominent Las Vegas firm that is representing ENN, helped it locate a 9,000-acre (3,600-hectare) desert site that it is buying well below appraised value from Clark County, where Rory Reid formerly chaired the county commission.”

    Although these reports are in plain view, the mainstream media has so far ignored this link.

    The BLM’s official reason for encircling the Bundy family with sniper teams and helicopters was to protect the endangered desert tortoise, which the agency has previously been killing in mass due to “budget constraints.”

    “A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher; they want his land,” journalist Dana Loesch wrote. “The tortoise wasn’t of concern when [U.S. Senator] Harry Reid worked with BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore.”

    “Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests,” she added. “BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area.”

    “If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.”

    Update: The Drudge Report, the #1 news aggregate site in the world, has now picked up this story. Unfortunately for the BLM, the documents they wanted to delete are now exposed for the world to see. Source


    “”The way this works, of course, is that BLM runs land theft operations by claiming they are “managing” the land and thereby kicking everyone else off it. They then invoke a reptile, an owl, a bird, a snake or some other animal which they claim to be “saving,” even while they are stealing and destroying hundreds of cattle belonging to a private rancher trying to make an honest living in a nation where productive Americans are increasingly branded “enemies of the state.”

    Once control of the land is established via court order or by bringing armed men with automatic weapons, BLM then turns around and leases the land to fracking companies who proceed to exploit the land using hydraulic fracturing techniques that inject toxic chemicals into groundwater supplies (and have been linked to earthquakes). The money collected by the BLM is then used to increase BLM salaries and bonuses.

    In essence, the BLM is a criminal mafia racket, and Cliven Bundy just happened to be in the way of their next target, the Gold Butte area of Nevada. That is why they brought hundreds of heavily armed men to a “save the tortoise” operation.”

    So is Dingy, his fam or buds getting a piece of the oil action? “

    78posted on Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:37:34 PMby Paladin2


    I guess we should be thankful that they’re not creating Famines/Wars/Rebellions to rid people off land they want to confiscate for oil, gold mines, land, water rights…oops, they are… Today in most countries in the west they use “saving the wildlife” as their guise. Interesting how much the reigning and non-reigning Royal Monarchy Families, “London of City”, and “Company”/Corporations are so into saving the owls and polar bears especially since they couldn’t give a damn about human life due to their “concern” regarding overpopulation when we all know the world population can fit into Texas with each person getting over 1000 sq ft in which to live. As for food – the Irish survived on potatoes (while the Anglo invaders ate the beef and grains), the East Indians survived on rice (while the Anglo invaders ate beef and grains). Interesting that most of the Famines were man-made and hit only the “undesirables” - they actually transported food from both colonized countries to England, and their militaries stationed in other countries they were colonizing at the time. Anyway, like then, there’s plenty of food for all of us but only if the Oligarchs would leave the land and water alone.


    If we don’t have property rights – We become the property!

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Sebelius Replacement-Sylvia Burwell: Bill Gates Vaccines, Common Core, GMOs in Africa

    Friday, April 11, 2014
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Editor of

    (NaturalNews) Kathleen Sebelius, HHS Secretary who oversaw the disastrously botched Obamacare website and rollout, has finally resigned. In line with the sheer delusion being invoked to try to call Obamacare a “success,” even this resignation is being called another success story. “Kathleen Sebelius Is Resigning Because Obamacare Has Won,” tweeted the White House (1) — a claim met with sheer derision by nearly anyone who can still think straight.

    With Obamacare, all failures are “successes” merely because the White House says so. Even the enrollment numbers are largely faked.(2)

    The replacement for Kathleen Sebelius is none other than Sylvia Burwell, “a key aide to Microsoft founder Bill Gates,” reports Breitbart News (3). “Burwell served as both chief operating officer and head of the global development program at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.” Sylvia Burwell steeped in biotech industry collusion, biopiracy and western domination of developing nations

    • Sylvia Burwell, “a key aide to Microsoft founder Bill Gates,” reports Breitbart News (3).
    • “Burwell served as both chief operating officer and head of the global development program at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”
    • “Sylvia Mathews Burwell is president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Development Program,” says her profile page on a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation website (4).
    • That same page goes on to describe how she is helping U.S. corporations destroy the world, using code words that sound like peace-loving efforts (translated here)
    • “She oversees efforts to help the world’s poorest people lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty.” Translation:
    • She supports Monsanto, GMOs and biotech domination of third world nations.
    • “Burwell leads Global Development’s grantmaking and advocacy in various foundation initiatives.” Translation:
    • She pays local groups to help U.S. corporations dominate and control their local farms (GMOs), health care (vaccines) and water supplies (hygiene).
    • Burwell was also a director of the industry-colluding group Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a front group for pushing GMO dominance into developing nations. As GM Watch reports (5),
    • “On October 12, 2010, representatives from the Seattle based group ‘AGRA Watch’ joined colleagues from South Africa and Kenya to critique the actions of the Gates foundation and its Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) colluding with industry to promote GMOs and pressure African countries to legalize them.”
    • Sylvia Burwell also worked closely with AGRA’s chief financial officer, Alexander Friedman, founder and president of Accelerated Clinical, a “biotechnology services company dedicated to accelerating the clinical trial process for biotechnology firms.” (6)AGRA Watch is a Seattle-based group that, according to their website:

      [is] challenging the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s questionable agricultural programs in Africa, including its Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). The Gates Foundation and AGRA claim to be “pro-poor” and “pro-environment,” but their approach is closely aligned with transnational corporations, such as Monsanto, and foreign policy actors like USAID. They take advantage of food and global climate crises to promote high-tech, market-based, industrial agriculture and generate profits for corporations even while degrading the environment and dis-empowering farmers. Their programs are a form of philanthrocapitalism based on biopiracy.

      AGRA Watch goes on to explain, “The [Gates] Foundation promotes industrial farming, inappropriate technologies, and pro-corporate policies that will make things worse for the hungry, for small farmers, consumer health, and the environment in Africa.”

      Sylvia Burwell also has strong ties to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bill Clinton and Robert Rubin. (7)

    Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Stealth vaccines, sterilization programs and Common Core

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of course, has also been aggressively pursuing global vaccination programs linked to spreading polio-like symptoms among children in third-world nations.

    The same organization has also developed stealth nanoparticle vaccines and controversial sterilization technologies for men that blast their testicles with high-powered sound waves to make them infertile.

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has also been a key funding partner for the Common Core effort to hijack the education system and replace education with confusion and disinfo. As Natural News has publicized, Common Core mathematics problems are intentionally written to make children mentally ill by making them doubt they can think clearly. Many of the Common Core lessons and word problems for students are written in the same kind of bizarre, nonsensical word riddles that White House operatives use to claim Obamacare is a success.

    That a person with longstanding ties to these destructive campaigns that destroy the bodies and minds of human beings should be selected to run HHS is no coincidence. HHS oversees the FDA, and the FDA is tasked with making sure no natural cures or nutritional supplements can ever tell the truth about their ability to prevent disease and support healing. The FDA also runs the Big Pharma monopoly racket that bans affordable drugs from licensed Canadian pharmacies from entering the United States or being purchased by U.S. cities, companies and individuals. The FDA even fined Google $500 million for merely running ads from Canadian pharmacies.

    With the help of incoming HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell, there’s little doubt that the full force of the U.S. government will now be directed to attacking both Americans and children of third-world nations with mandatory enforcement of toxic vaccine injections and mandatory deployment of Common Core anti-education efforts to ensure that children don’t acquire real mathematics or problem-solving skills. You are witnessing the official roll-out of the “world dumbing-down initiative” to reduce the population and keep people as stupid as possible so they can’t rise up against corruption and evil.

    Remember, Bill Gates is the person who openly said that vaccines can be used to reduce the world population. He admitted this openly, on stage, in a speech before a live audience.

    Sylvia Burwell seems dedicated to helping make sure that’s exactly what happens.

    Sources for this article include:








    Source – naturalnews



    Billionaires for Population Control: Bill Gates, Sr. (2nd from left), co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and father of the Microsoft founder, is pictured next to Ted Turner, George Soros and David Rockefeller who've all heavily donated to depopulation efforts.

    Billionaires for Population Control: Bill Gates, Sr. (2nd from left), co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and father of the Microsoft founder, is pictured next to Ted Turner, George Soros and David Rockefeller who’ve all heavily donated to depopulation efforts.





    Why is Bill Gates depicted as a saint by the media? He funds them!


    Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA): The Gates Foundation has partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation to enhance agricultural science and small-farm productivity in Africa, building on the Green Revolution that the Rockefeller Foundation spurred in the 1940s and 1960s. The Gates Foundation has made an initial US$100 million investment in this effort, to which the Rockefeller Foundation has contributed US$50 million. Critics allege that the Foundation has a preference to make grants that benefit multinational agribusiness, such as Monsanto..”


    Gates studied the work of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and in 1994 sold some of his Microsoft stock to create the “William H. Gates Foundation.””

    “Gates has credited the generosity and extensive philanthropy of David Rockefeller as a major influence. Gates and his father met with Rockefeller several times, and their charity work is partly modeled on the Rockefeller family‘s philanthropic focus…”


    Rockefeller Foundation: “It developed and funded various German eugenics programs, including the one that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz

    William Gates Sr. has been a board member of Eugenic Planned Parenthood  since the fifties which is a rebranded organization birthed out of the American Eugenics Society. In a 2003 interview with PBS Bill Moyers, the son admitted that his father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders” and “human weeds” in need of culling. The American Eugenics Society – Planned Parenthood was largely funded the Rockefeller Foundation.

    The Gates family are an old rich American dynasty family along with the Carnegies, Rockefellers, Hewlettt’s, Packer’s….Bill Gates owns over 500,000 Monsanto shares… Bottomline – they’re taking over the worlds food supply and the water supply.


    Sylvia Burwell was obviously hired on Gates recommendation. One has to wonder how the Corporate Media will spin the Death Panel issue this time around.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

    Eric Holder Refused to Release Docs to Congress – He Released them to Terrorists

    Video: Eric Holder desplaying his thuggery to Congress – “You Don’t Go There, Buddy!”

    It was a heated exchange between Attorney General Eric Holder and Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas on Tuesday in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, with barbs coming from both sides. Rep. Gohmert brought up documents that Eric Holder has been held in contempt for failing to provide to Congress, yet he has released them to attorneys for terrorists.

    Eric Holder Still Won't Release Docs

    In all the entertainment provided by the not-so-friendly banter, it can be easy to miss a very serious issue – why is Eric Holder’s Department of Justice releasing documents to terrorists that he still won’t release to the committee that represents the interests of the American people?

    Do “we, the people” not deserve an answer?

    That is the question that Rep. Gohmert was trying to get answered Tuesday.

    His frustration with Holder was apparent when he referenced the “documents that the Department of Justice handed over to people convicted of supporting terrorism. They’re terrorists. We’ve given them the documents, the Justice Department has.”

    According to Gohmert, it is apparent that “they are easily provided, just not to members of Congress.”

    He went on to explain:

    “I still do not understand why your department can provide documents to terrorist lawyers… and not provide them to members of Congress. All I’m asking, again, is could we please get the documents that have been put on disks of the 96,000 summaries of transcripts and the documents that were produced to the terrorists, and not some link, but documents that you made available or your department made available to terrorists. I renew my request.”

    Eric Holder told the representative that his department has given the committee what they promised. That is when the sparks began to fly.

    Gohmert retorted, “Sir, I’ve read you what your department promised, and it is inadequate, and I realize that contempt is not a big deal to our attorney general, but it is important that we have proper oversight.”

    You don’t want to go there, Buddy,” shot back an angry Holder. “You don’t want to go there, ok?”

    Really? The sarcasm dripped in Gohmert’s response, “I don’t want to go there? About the contempt?”

    Gohmert Reacts To Eric Holder

    It was December 14, 2010, that U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry was killed, and the Fast and Furious scandal became part of public conversation. Attorney General Eric Holder still has not answered the American people adequately after all this time.

    The Texas Congressman is trying to get answers that are far too long in coming. How is it that Eric Holder releases documents to terrorists before releasing them to the oversight committees in Congress? Those committees are in place as part of the checks and balances in government that elementary school children learn about.

    Rep. Gohmert reiterated his frustration to Attorney General Eric Holder: “Sir, we’ve been trying to get to the bottom of Fast and Furious where people died, where at least a couple of hundred Mexicans died, and we can’t get the information to get to the bottom of that. So I don’t need lectures from you about contempt.”

    Docs Still Needed From Eric Holder

    Holder sent a parting shot that many in the media have picked up on: “Good luck with your asparagus.” This was an allusion to a comment made by Gohmert to Holder last year when he alledgedly got tongue-tied in another heated debate with Eric Holder. The Blaze reports that Gohmert was actually quoting an old criminal attorney, Percy Foreman, when he would use levity to bring down hostility levels in the courtroom by saying, “I object, he’s casting aspersions on my asparagus!” However, both the comment and the attention that it has garnered are a distraction from the very real issue at hand.

    That issue is that Eric Holder seems to be showing contempt for the very people that he was appointed to serve by continually evading questions about Fast and Furious. When terrorists get documents from the Justice Department before Congress does, Holder’s contempt is especially concerning. That is a problem.

    [images via Bing]


    It’s important not to sideline the major issue.


    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

    Operation American Spring – May 16, 2014



    OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING – Washington, D.C. in the cross-hairs – The Out-of-Control Government Leadership Must Be Stopped



    (Please add the above title and some or all data from below to your FB, Twitter, Blog, Email list)


    TO: Patriots (black, white, red, yellow, brown, male, female, civilian, military, truckers, bikers, militias, veterans, old, young, every American that loves freedom and liberty)

    Mission: Restoration of Constitutional government, rule of law, freedom, liberty “of the people, by the people, for the people” from despotic and tyrannical federal leadership.


    • Millions of Americans will participate.
    • American veterans and patriots are energized to end the tyranny, lawlessness, and shredding of the US Constitution.
    • Government is not the target, it is sound; corrupt and criminal leadership must be replaced.
    • Those in power will not hesitate to use force against unarmed, peaceful patriots exercising their constitutional rights.
    • Patriots may be killed, wounded, incarcerated.
    • There is no hope given today’s technology of secrecy for the effort nor do we want it secret.

    Concept of Operations:

    Phase 1 – Field millions, as many as ten million, patriots who will assemble in a peaceful, non-violent, physically unarmed (Spiritually/Constitutionally armed), display of unswerving loyalty to the US Constitution and against the incumbent government leadership in Washington D.C., with the mission to replace with law abiding leadership. Go full-bore, no looking back, steadfast in the mission.

    Phase 2 – One million or more of the assembled 10 million must be prepared to stay in D.C. as long as it takes to see Obama, Biden, Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and Attorney General Holder removed from office.
    Consistent with the US Constitution, as required, the U.S. Congress will take appropriate action, execute appropriate legislation, deal with vacancies, or U.S. States will appoint replacements for positions vacated consistent with established constitutional requirements.

    Phase 3 – Those with the principles of a West, Cruz, Dr. Ben Carson, Lee, DeMint, Paul, Gov Walker, Sessions, Gowdy, Jordan, should comprise a tribunal and assume positions of authority to convene investigations, recommend appropriate charges against politicians and government employees to the new U.S. Attorney General appointed by the new President.

    *All actions in Phase 2 & 3 will be consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

    Date of Operation: “OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING – Beginning Of Tyranny Housecleaning, May 16, 2014, completion to be determined


    We are past the point of no return, thus must move forward with an effort to save our nation, as there is no other choice. We are asking, pleading with you, and any others that have resources, national voices, email lists, blogs, FB, Twitter, to call for a non-violent American Spring May 16 2014 in Washington D.C. We must appeal to ten million and more American patriots to come and stay in Washington, D.C. to stop the White House and Congress from total destruction of the United States. It’s now or never. God help us.


    …..the law of nature rules. A fluffy, cuddly lamb gets eaten by a mean old wolf is not an illegal or immoral event…the law of nature. When some greedy, self-serving occupant of the White House or Congress, or elements outside America, is threatening our existence, our freedom, our liberty, our Constitution, our life resources, our America, then we fight back to destroy the threat and there is nothing immoral or illegal about it. When the government becomes lawless, then “we the people” no longer are obligated to follow the government……there is no law when government picks and chooses for political purposes or personal agenda. At this time the government is performing as a lawless entity……


    A duck cannot be turned into a fox; an elephant cannot be turned into a flea; the laws of nature will not permit. Likewise, a nation ordained and principled by the laws of nature, sovereign, free, with liberty for all cannot naturally become a nation guided by royalty, decrees, tyranny, elitist, self-serving criminals. The former has proven desirable, the latter has proven human pain.

    “We can become a nation guided by royalty IF “we the people” beguiled by the government in surrender to our lusts for that which we have not earned –for what is not natural –if we have become intoxicated by unbroken success” as Lincoln proclaimed in March 30 ,1863 call for fasting, humiliation, and prayer–we can very easily heap to ourselves leaders, and with itching ears, be turned from the Truth to become enslaved by the LIE.”
    The United States of America (elephant) while embracing the “LIE” is teetering on the abyss of becoming a sniveling, blood sucking, undesirable nation (flea).

    OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING will be a gigantic step in removing the flea infestation that is sucking the blood out of America.

    We see no reasonable, hopeful sign that indicates there are honorable, loyal, mature, critical thinking, experienced people in government that understands the chaos about to rain down on America, nor do they care….our only hope is that “we the people” call, organize, and draw a few million patriots to stay in D.C. for an “American Spring”. It would be the catalyst to draw the line and bring to a conclusion a decision on the out of control government, one way or the other. America will rise up or surrender………for me, I only go to my knees in the presence of God Almighty……… knees will not touch the surface as a result of some piss ant occupant of the White House or a corrupt legislator, or outside element…I will fall to my death standing if necessary.

    There is not much time and the only planning necessary is to select a starting date, which we have done, and then show up in Washington, D.C. on that date, and plan to stay for the duration. The goal is restoring the US Constitution as the law of the land, removing the lawless leadership.

    Will this be a cake-walk?

    No, it will be painful, and some people may die because the government will not be non-violent; some of us will end up in a cell, and some may be injured. If that’s what it will take to save our nation, do we have any choice? Freedom loving Americans will say there is no choice, we must begin the second American Revolution. Not with guns, but with millions of Americans demanding a return to constitutional government and the resignation of Obama, Biden, Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and Holder as a start…then the constitutional restoration process can begin. An AMERICAN SPRING can be avoided only if the above mentioned officials resign.

    Will our national patriot leaders step forward and declare, “send me”, I’ll lead? There are millions of veterans and patriots ready to follow and have said “I will go”.

    I urge all organizations, groups, particularly veterans and military retirees begin planning to visit Washington, D.C beginning May 16, 2014. Keep tuned to Constitutional Emergency/Patriots for America for updates and guidance.

    Please bathe this effort in prayer as there is no personal agenda or gain save liberty, freedom, and restoration of constitutional government for “we the people”.


    Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret


    Time: May 16, 2014 at 5pm to June 16, 2014 at 6pm

    Location: Washington DC Capital, Monuments, Ellipse, Reflection Pool

    City/Town: Washington DC

    Website or Map: Here.

    Phone: 850-689-1818


    Talk show host interviews US Col. Riley!

    Obama is all for overthrowing Assad and other dictators.

    How would he feel if he was booted out?


    2nd top military man calls for millions to march on D.C. –

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    If the Feds Take Your Cattle and Property, YOU Become Cattle

    April 10, 2014

    Government is using environmentalism to confuse the public and the Left/Right paradigm to divide the public so they can enslave us in an Agenda 21 future where we have no property and no rights. The last rancher — “the last man standing” — across the Mojave Desert to the Pacific Ocean, Cliven Bundy, is in a fight for his rights and your rights against a federal bureaucracy that’s out of control.

    Both of these videos are well worth watching. Agenda 21 is in the US and it’s happening in your country in one way or another…be aware – do some research on agenda 21.


    Operation American Spring:

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Range War – Nevada Cattle Rancher Standoff

    Endangered tortoise is being used as justification to assault Nevada rancher’s property rights!!!


    Clark County is in the southern region of Nevada. Bundy is in defiance of a 2013 court order which demands he remove his cattle from US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM). His family has grazed the 600,000 public land since the 1800s. Bundy had this to say about the armed federal agents attempting to remove his cattle from the Gold Butte area: “I have raised cattle on that land, which is public land for the people of Clark County, all my life. Why I raise cattle there and why I can raise cattle there is because I have preemptive rights. Who is the trespasser here? Who is the trespasser on this…

    Heavily armed federal agents have converged on Clark County, Nevada to stop the grazing of cattle on public lands. The standoff has been brewing for decades and only one rancher still remains in the fight. Cliven Bundy has likened the fight against the federal government in support of both individual rights and states’ rights to the Ruby Ridge and Waco tragedies.


    Clark County is in the southern region of Nevada. Bundy is in defiance of a 2013 court order which demands he remove his cattle from US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management. His family has grazed the 600,000 public land since the 1800s.


    Bundy had this to say about the armed federal agents attempting to remove his cattle from the Gold Butte area:

    “I have raised cattle on that land, which is public land for the people of Clark County, all my life. Why I raise cattle there and why I can raise cattle there is because I have preemptive rights. Who is the trespasser here? Who is the trespasser on this land? Is the United States trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Or is it Cliven Bundy who is trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Who’s the trespasser?”

    Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US National Park Service officials have deployed armed federal agents, “contract cowboys,” aka Cattle Rustlers – and possibly snipers to restrict Bundy’s access to the Gold Butte public land. When asked by journalist to confirm the snipers Carol Bundy, Cliven’s wife, believes she saw near their home, federal officials would neither confirm or deny the deployment of such agents to the Gold Butte public lands area.

    A statement from federal officials about the longstanding battle over cattle grazing on public lands in Nevada reads:

    “Cattle have been in trespass on public lands in southern Nevada for more than two decades. This is unfair to the thousands of other ranchers who graze livestock in compliance with federal laws and regulations throughout the West. The Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. An impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is now being conducted as a last resort.” (MC->there’s very few of them left since they were run off by the BLM already)

    To date, approximately 235 of Bundy’s 900 so-called trespass cattle, have been impounded by the federal government. In 1993 the Nevada rancher stopped paying the grazing fees required by the Bureau of Land Management. In court filings related to the case, Cliven Bundy stated that he was not obligated to pay such fees because his Mormon ancestors had worked the Gold Butte lands in question long before the agency had been created.

    The Clark County public lands were declared off limits for cattle in 1998 when the area became a designated habitat for the federally protected desert tortoise. “It’s a freedom issue. It’s not about the cows. It’s a state rights issue,” Bundy said.

    gold butte

    Ranchers and energy producers in five states are currently embroiled in a similar battle over private land usage and property rights due to the new protective status of the lesser prairie chicken. Some see the emerging restrictions on public and private land usage, and EPA pond and water usage limits, as a furtherance of the Agenda 21 initiative.

    more here:


    Bottomline: It’s not about turtles. It’s about fracking and huge profits for the International Globalists who use the UN as their “global office”.  The Clinton Globalists instigated this “environmental” land grab racket by signing treaties, one of them being Agenda 21, on behalf of the internationalist mafiosia…Clinton, Bush, Obama are just their foot-soldiers. “President” Wilson was among the first to sell us out…


    A brief overview of Agenda 21:

    In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” – Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991

    The Club of Rome is a Neo-Malthusian organization with interlocking membership with European power elite groups such as the Committee of 300 and the Bilderberg Group. Thomas Robert Malthus argued that population was held within resource limits by two types of checks: positive ones, which raised the death rate, and preventative ones, which lowered the birth rate. The positive checks included hunger, disease and war; the preventative checks, abortion, birth control, prostitution, postponement of marriage, and celibacy. The Club of Rome’s members, including Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands and Mikhail Gorbachev, believe humanity requires “a common motivation, namely a common adversary” in order to realize their world government.

    World Depopulation

    According to the club’s publications, the common enemy of humanity is man. One of the major goals of the Club of Rome is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. Not only did the Club of Rome’s 1972 report, “Limits to Growth” call for a reduced level of consumption of resources, it also argued that humankind needs to re-evaluate its exploitative attitude towards humans and the earth itself. The failure to give more foreign aid is indicative of the increased selfishness of rich countries. Meanwhile, the world’s richest 20 per cent of the population consume 86 per cent of its goods and services, over half its energy and nearly half its meat and fish.

    In the Club of Rome book, The First Global Revolution, the group called for a “limit to growth” approach to solve the world’s problems, in fact a problem the global elite has with humanity. “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill,” the book states. “All these dangers are caused by human intervention,” and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

    It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or… one invented for the purpose.” In the process of struggling against this implacable enemy, democracy “will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power.”

    One World Government

    Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, expanded on this topic in his article, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. According to Haass, a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming and terrorism, both invented as the Club of Rome suggested. “Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change,” writes Haass. “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.”

    In 1976, the United States Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was formed for the purpose of gradually shutting down the U.S. economy. Since then, working in concert with their international counterparts, they have been pushing the junk science of climate change, fueled a global financial crisis triggered by the mortgage crisis in America resulting in $Trillions being transferred to globalist banks from countries around the world on the brink of default, and enciting revolutions throughout the Middle East that are spreading to the Western world. Our global rulers are systematically taking down the global economy in order to impose what Haass describes as “an international system of either world government or anarchy.”

    The Club of Rome, headed by Maurice Strong, is THE group that takes the issue of global warming (whether real or imagined) as an excuse to institute a one world government, or new world order. Glenn Beck and guest discuss this in preparation for upcoming guest Lord Christopher Monckton.

    Led by Progressives in the U.S. Congress, they have been able to pass a cap-and-trade system that will result in the largest transfer of wealth in U.S. history with relatively little opposition. In recent years, with the help of the corporate media, they have cranked up the propaganda about climate change and will eventually impose punitive carbon taxes on the American people, a scheme that may eventually lead to the near complete reversal of hundreds of years of technological progress and man’s return to the stone age. via:


    Informative site with credible sourcing - includes info on Agenda 2, members etc…..

    or it on this site….

    The Green Agenda: Club of Rome – Club of Budapest – Club of Madrid

    Australia To The UN: No More “Socialism Masquerading As Environmentalism” (Agenda 21)

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers (Part I)

     March 29th, 2014

    …by Jonas E. Alexis


    29741393zA few days ago, Paul Kendal of the British newspaper the Telegraph wrote that in 1941 a medical officer by the name of Major Leo Skurnik received an Iron Cross from the German high command. Skurnik happened to be a Jew. Kendal wrote,

    “And Skurnik was not the only Jew fighting on the side of the Germans. More than 300 found themselves in league with the Nazis when Finland, who had a mutual enemy in the Soviet Union, joined the war in June 1941.”[1]

    Yet Kendal, without serious self-examination, propounded, “The alliance between Hitler and the race he vowed to annihilate — the only instance of Jews fighting for Germany’s allies — is one of the most extraordinary aspects of the Second World War, and yet hardly anyone, including many Finns, know anything about it.”[2]

    The serious historical questions which Kendal failed to posit and which are largely and sometimes deliberately ignored by the Holocaust establishment are simply these: If Hitler’s goal was to annihilate an entire race, how is it possible that there were thousands upon thousands of people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany?

    Is it historically and intellectually satisfying to maintain both contradictory positions at the same time and in the same respect? Is it rationally sound to say that those Jewish people were simply dupes and simply didn’t know Hitler’s real intention? Didn’t they know that their ultimate doom was concentration camps? What actually made them join the Third Reich?

    Those are some of the many questions that I asked one writer who happened to publish a widely read book on Nazi Germany. The book is published by the University of California.

    In our long private conversation, he kept positing that it was Hitler’s intent to exterminate the Jews of Europe, but throughout his analysis, he failed to seriously deal with the puzzling situation that people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany posed a serious threat to the prevailing thesis that the Hitler wanted to exterminate all Jews of Europe.

    Jewish historian Walter Laqueur attempted to answer this nagging dichotomy last year. He admitted that there were indeed people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany, but argued that

    “Nazi policy toward half- and quarter-Jews (Mischlinge of the first and second degree) was contradictory and changed over time. Half-Jews who were not brought up as Jews (Geltungsjuden) were not deported and killed: There were legal problems, and Hitler, who did not want to be bothered by lawyers, declared that he would take a binding decision only after the final victory.

    “Those of military age had to serve in the army both at the beginning of the war and its end when the armed forces were depleted. But in between they were excluded from military service, and they were not permitted to serve in positions of command.”[3]

    Is this historically accurate? What, then, is the background of all these complex issues and how can one confront some of the prevailing claims of the Holocaust establishment?

    1007106-179234-1Jewish historian Bryan Mark Rigg maintains in his study Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers that “numerous areas relating to the Holocaust and the Nazi era in general remain largely unexplained or poorly understood.”[4]

    These areas are poorly understood because theories that are inconsistent with the prevailing vision of the Holocaust establishment—even when based on historical documentation—are dismissed without examination. It is no accident that Laqueur called Rigg’s study “malevolent, more often ignorant, and breathtakingly obtuse in its conclusions.”[5]

    Much of Rigg’s sources are from archival documents and personal interviews with those who said they were of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany, but since Laqueur does not seem to be interested in serious research like this, he dismisses Rigg by name-calling.

    Rigg argues that “tens of thousands of men of Jewish descent served in the Wehrmacht during Hitler’s rule,” and according to his best estimate, the number of soldiers of Jewish extraction—a group he terms Mischlinge—was more than 150,000.[6] He warns readers, however, that

    “previous estimates varied and future scholars may devise more advanced computations to produce a more precise figure. All such efforts should lead to the same significant conclusion: the number of Mischlinge in the Wehrmacht was far greater than anyone previously imagined.”[7]

    Albert S. Lindemann

    Officers such as Bernhard Losener were well aware that if Hitler “treated half-Jews as Jews, the armed forces would probably lose 45,000 soldiers.”[8]

    Hitler “allowed some Mischlinge to apply for exemptions under section 7 of the supplementary decrees of November 1935. In some cases, if Hitler approved, the Mischlinge was allowed to call himself or herself an Aryan.”[9]

    Similarly, Jewish historian Sarah Gordon notes,

    “In Germany some Jews even supported Hitler despite his anti-Semitism…Max Naumann, the head of the Association of German National Jews, ardently solicited support from the Nazi party after Hitler had come to power, pointing out the national loyalty of his members and their service to the German nation.

    “Gerhart Hauptmann, a Nobel Prize recipient for literature, even voted for Hitler. Many Jews were quite comfortable living in Germany despite latent anti-Semitism, whether intellectual or social.”[10]

    Hitler “played a direct role” in allowing such Jews to remain in his service.[11] Those Mischlinge families “had lived in Germany for generations, and most had lost all contact with their Jewish heritage. They had helped develop German society, fought in her wars, and furthered her culture. Some had not known of their Jewish heritage until Hitler came to power.”[12]

    Historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California states that some Jews supported the Third Reich “at its creation; they had prospered materially in it, and they remained reticent to criticize it in a fundamental way.”[13]

    What’s more startling is that Hitler “even allowed some to become high-ranking officers. Generals, admirals, navy ship captains, fighter pilots, and many ordinary soldiers served with Hitler’s personal approval.”[14] More importantly,

    “Many German Jews and Mischlinge thought that Hitler based his anti-Semitic tirades on Ostjuden [German and Eastern Jews] who had emigrated from the ‘land of Bolshevism.’ The Nazis reinforced this preconception when they issued decrees against Ostjuden in 1933 and later when they forced eighteen thousand of them to leave the Reich in 1938…

    Howard M. Sachar

    “Dr. Max Naumann, a Jew and a retired World War I army major and founder of the militant right-wing organization of National German Jews, wrote Hitler on 20 March 1935 that he and his followers had fought to keep Ostjuden out of Germany. Naumann felt that these ‘hordes of half-Asian Jews’ were ‘dangerous guests’ in Germany and must be ‘ruthlessly expelled.’”[15]

    Academically and economically, those Ostjuden made little progress largely because they learned “Polish Talmudic barbarism, as contrasted with refined German Bildung (education).”[16] Lindemann writes that

    “Western Jews often described Ostjuden as parasitic and filled with hatred of non-Jews, those specifically Jewish qualities that were the source of the most insistent and hostile remarks by anti-Semites about Jews generally.”[17]

    The Ostjuden were humiliated by the German Jews, who viewed them as “irrational, mystical,” and believed that their “superstitious religion…no longer had a place in a world based on reason and scientific knowledge.”[18]

    Therefore, for the fully assimilated German Jews, “Hitler’s anti-Semitism” was “a reaction to the culture of the Ostjuden.”[19] Karl Marx himself despised the Ostjuden.[20]

    It was no accident, then, that a group of wealthy intellectual Jews who were already immersed in Enlightenment thought and practice would despise some German Jews because of their “primitive lifestyle.”[21]

    Wolf Zuelzer, “a 75 percent Jew,” declared that “for the majority of German Jews, the Orthodox Ostjuden dressed in his caftan, fur hat and ritual side-locks was a frightening apparition from the Dark Ages.”[22]

    As a result, at the dawn of the twentieth century, “many of the local Jewish communities in Germany refused to allow Eastern Jews to vote in community elections on the grounds that they were not German nationals.”[23]

    Robert Braun, a Mischlinge, noted, “Generally, Mischlinge are very anti-Semitic.”[24] Unsurprisingly, a number of Jewish groups strongly supported National Socialism, because they saw the Ostjuden

    “as a grave danger to their social standing who, if allowed to stay in Germany, would only intensify anti-Semitic feelings. In several public statements during the 1920s and 1930s, liberal German Jews labeled Ostjuden ‘inferior’ and asked for state assistance to combat their immigration…Robert Braun recalled that his Jewish father, Dr. R. Leopold Braun, was an anti-Semite who did not like Ostjuden.”[25]

    Not only that, most of the Mischlinge “felt Aryan and did everything they could to disassociate themselves from Jews and to be viewed as faithful Germans.”[26]

    Adolf Hitler


    Hitler’s racial theories did not come out of thin air. In the early 1920s,

    “he directed much of his hatred toward Eastern Jews and Jewish Communists…he also hated Communists and felt that Communism was a Jewish movement. He was present in Munich when Kurt Eisner, whom Hitler called ‘the international Jew,’ led his Socialist revolution from 1918 to 1919. Hitler felt that ‘Judeo-Bolsheviks’ like Esiner were responsible for and had profited from Germany’s defeat in World War I.”[27]

    As we saw in previous articles, it was not just Hitler who saw that Bolshevism would create a nightmare in Europe. Winston Churchill and many other political leaders drew similar conclusions. For Hitler, the Jews made matters worse when the Red Terror, which was dominated by Jews,

    “tried to gain more power, under the leadership of people of such Russian Jew Eugen Levine…As a witness to this chaos in Bavaria, Hitler described it as being a ‘rule by the Jews.’ So, since Hitler felt that Communism was a Jewish movement and inherently dangerous, he directed his hatred toward the Jews.”[28]

    It was a sense of Jewish supremacy over the Germans that accelerated the Nazis to move quickly to develop a response to Jewish ascendancy. In the early part of the 1900s, Lindemann says,

    “Gentiles could hardly miss noting how many liberal German-speaking Jews had begun to assert that a Jewish background engendered enlightenment, while a Germanic heritage was a burden, pulling in the direction of irrationality and barbarism. As historian Steven Beller has commented, ‘Jews…began to see themselves as bearers of the Enlightenment’ in Austria and Germany.”[29]

    Lindemman continues,

    “In private correspondence, Graetz expressed his destructive contempt for German values and Christianity even more forthrightly. In 1868 he had written to Moses Hess, ‘I am looking forward with pleasure to flogging the Germans and their leaders—Schleirmacher, Fichte, and the whole wretched Romantic school.’ In the same letter, he wrote ‘we must above all work to shatter Christianity.’”[30]

    As early as 1902, a Viennese Jew by the name of Solomon Ehrmann talked about how the world needed to be “Jewified” in order to be enlightened and in order to fulfill the goals and purposes of Judaism.[31] This idea played a major role during the Bolshevik Revolution, particularly in the lives of non-Jews who joined the movement.[32]

    Yet this side of history has never seen the light of day in the Holocaust establishment precisely because it would destroy the building block of this school of thought completely. Jewish historian Howard M. Sachar has a chapter on Nazi Germany in his over a thousand-page work A History of the Jews in America. Incredibly, he doesn’t even touch on these complex issues.[33]

    Instead, he tells us that “anti-Semitic discrimination in all echelons of the Polish economy kept a quarter million Jews endlessly dependent on soup kitchens, clinics, orphanages.”[34]

    What is even more astonishing is that when discussing the Frankfurt School, Sachar only mentions in passing that it was an institution funded largely by Jews and for Jewish leftists, but failed to document their pornographic and revolutionary activities.

    Moreover, he did not even touch on the pornographic nature of Weimar Germany, which Jewish revolutionaries made possible and which eventually incited anti-Jewish reactions among some racialists and other secular intellectuals and writers of various stripes. On the contrary, Sachar extols the school: “It was extraordinary research, in both quantity and quality.”[35]

    Sachar turns a blind eye because his ideology does not allow him to see the obvious. He keeps propounding the unconvincing thesis that Jewish persecution was a direct result of hatred, rather than Jewish revolutionary activity.

    Although Sachar mentions that a number of Jews participated in the Bolshevik Revolution, he tempers his remarks by saying, “The largest numbers of Russian Jews had never adopted a Bolshevik political agenda.”[36] According to Sachar, Jews are persecuted because of their success![37]

    ynjsoldiersDespite the fact that many Germans during that time opposed anti-Semitism, it was obvious to them that “many Jews themselves were not genuinely interested in mixing but were rather bent on destruction and domination.”[38] Rigg noted the same thing:

    “Quarter-Jew Horst von Oppenfeld, a descendant of the Jewish Oppenheim family, who was a captain and an adjutant to Stauffenberg, said that Orthodox Jews experience so many problems because they do not assimilate. ‘Their problem,’ he claims, ‘is due to the fact that they want to be different.’”[39]

    Daniel Jonah Goldhagen argues in his book Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust that anti-Semitism was so ingrained in the entire German people that not even the ordinary Germans were spared that irrational hatred.[40]

    Other Jewish writers such as Lucy Dawidowicz and Steven T. Katz ascribe to that thesis.[41] Yehuda Bauer agrees with many of Goldhagen’s theses and tries mightily to rescue him from historical oblivion and insanity, although he criticizes Goldhagen on other issues.[42] Yet Lindemann tells us a different story:

    “Racism and anti-Semitism were, in the eyes of many German-speaking Jews, more accurately seen as products of reactionaries and of the mob. Hatred of Jews, they believed, was most typically to be found in eastern Europe, or in the less developed parts of the German-speaking world.”[43]

    Historically, the Goldhagen thesis suffers badly when one looks at Jews in Germany in the 1800s. Sarah Gordon, in a book that was written years before Goldhagen postulated his historically risible thesis, notes:

    “Cultural explanations that include anti-Semitism as a central reason for Hitler’s electoral success are inadequate as explanatory tools because of their nebulous formulation and because counterexamples from the works of famous scholars and writers indicate that cultural influences were diverse; for example, Treitschke wrote an anti-Semitic tract, but Mommsen wrote a countering statement.

    “Thus German’s cultural heritage was not uniformly anti-Semitic. Moreover, a deep commitment to a legal and constitutional state was shared by late-nineteenth-century liberals and conservatives. Both groups rejected all attempts to nullify the legal equality of Jews; not a single law was passed between 1869 and 1933 to rescind the new freedoms granted during the foundation of Germany.

    “Of course, in practice there were many instances of job discrimination, social snobbery, and other types of hostility toward Jews; these were common in all Western countries at the time. Nevertheless, legal emancipation was accepted as part and parcel of the new state despite pressure from rabid anti-Semites to re-impose legal restrictions on Jews.

    “Not only liberals and conservatives but also many Catholics and Protestants were opposed to anti-Semitic legislation on ideological or intellectual grounds…This was obviously a rational pragmatic stance, but in addition it was an expression of the humanitarianism embodied in Christian ethics.”[44]

    goldhagenBefore the 1930s, groups that adopted anti-Semitic propaganda influenced only a fraction of the population, and they “never drew a large percentage of the total votes. Only in the election of 1930 and later years did the Nazis succeed in obtaining strong support…and the causative role of anti-Semitism in this success is by no means clear.”[45] Moreover,

    “Between 1887 and 1912 anti-Semitic deputies represented only 2 percent of all Reichstag delegates, including all who were reelected, and by 1914 the anti-Semitic parties were practically defunct and their press was in ruins. After World War I additional small anti-Semitic parties arose with racist programs, but once again their electoral strength was less than 5 percent of all valid votes.

    “These small volkisch groups eventually either allied with and were absorbed by the Nazis or gradually faded into insignificance. The track record of anti-Semitic parties was very poor even from their own point of view.”[46]

    After laying out the historical background of anti-Jewish reaction, Gordon concludes that “the attributions of anti-Semitism to a uniquely distorted ‘German mind’ or ‘German character’ are largely irrelevant, whether based on psychology, sociology, intellectual history, or demonology.”[47]

    If Goldhagen is right, then Jews would never have gotten so much power in Germany. Gordon states, “German universities admitted Jews on an equal footing as early as 1790, and Jews were overrepresented among university professors and students between 1870 and 1933.”

    Jews in 1909-1910 were “less than 1 percent of the population,” yet “almost 12 percent of the instructors at German universities were Jewish, and an additional 7 percent were Jewish converts to Christianity, so that 19 percent of the instructors in Germany were of Jewish origin.”[48]

    Rigg writes that “between 1800 and 1900, around seventy thousand Jews converted to Christianity in Germany and in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. These numbers do not include those Jews who left Judaism and did not embrace another religion.”[49]

    The Jews perceived that the only way they could move forward was through assimilation, which sometimes included (false or opportunistic) conversion. For Heinrich Heine, conversion to Christianity was the “entrance ticket to European civilization…Most Jews who now converted to Christianity did so simply as a mode of qualifying per se and, as often as not, without really relinquishing their family and social ties with the Jewish community.”[50]

    Many of those Jews, after their conversions, as Michael A. Meyer puts it, “often associated almost exclusively with fellow converts. In Germany they were referred to as Tauffuden, baptized Jews. They had not really become Christians but had taken on a borderline identity in which they still feared the verdict of the Gentile.”[51]

    Karl Marx’s father, for example, accepted Christianity more “for practical reasons than heart-felt conviction.”[52] There were also instances where “Jewish parents would baptize their children in infancy while retaining their own religious status.”[53]

    In the nineteenth century, the tsar began to discover that Jews were fomenting revolution and began to establish policies in an attempt “to Russify the Jews through conversionist assimilation.”[54]

    Historian Erich E. Haberer writes that this was largely forced assimilation, but Jewish scholar Benjamin Nathans seems to show that it was not forced; since the tsarist government wanted the Jews to integrate, they produced a number of academic programs that would be suitable to Jews. One of them was the university, “the setting in which selective Jewish integration achieved its most dramatic success.”[55]

    There were also movements among the Jews that sought to “‘Europeanize’ Russian Jewry through secular education and general socio-cultural self-regeneration.”[56] The results of these undertakings were many, but one was that “Jewish gymnasium students and rabbinical seminarians” began to hijack nihilism, which was used “for preaching socialism, propagating revolution,” and so on. Nihilism was opposed by both Orthodox Jews and Gentiles.

    “On almost every level [the nihilists] had to struggle against unyielding opponents who viewed their unconventional behaviour and unauthorized activity as subversive to the established order of traditional Jewish and official Russian society.

    “For those who persevered this was a ‘school of dissent’ which imbued them with a sense of mission, gave them the stamina to fight on, and trained them to operate in a hostile environment.”[57]

    Heinrich Heine fit the pattern of Jews who converted to Christianity for political or “opportunistic reasons.”[58] This was justified when revolution broke out in France in the summer of 1830. Heine, who was on vacation during that time, felt that he too should take up arms in the revolutionary mode of the time. He wrote,

    “Gone is my longing for peace and quiet. Once again I know what I want, what I ought, what I must do…I am a son of the revolution and will take up arms.”[59]

    When Moses Mendelssohn, a Jewish composer who (opportunistically) converted to Christianity, failed to put his musical talent to revolutionary use, Heine scolded him. He lamented to one of his friends in 1846,

    “I cannot forgive this man of independent means, because he sees fit to serve the Christian pietists with his great and enormous talent. The more I admire his greatness, the more angry I am to see it so iniquitously misused. If I had the good fortune to be Moses Mendelssohn’s grandson, I would not use my talents to set the piss of the Lamb to music.”[60]

    Heine “contracted syphilis in his youth and died of the malady in 1856.”[61] During his last days, when his health was deteriorating, Heine gave signs that his conversion was not sincere. He said,

    “If I could walk with crutches I’d go to church, and if I could walk without I’d go to the whorehouse.”[62]

    He called Christianity “a gloomy, sanguinary religion for criminals,” and later noted that “I make no secret of my Judaism, to which I have not returned, because I have not left it.”[63]

    Around 1835 Heine met Marx and Engels, and in 1842 he foresaw that Communism would terrorize the entire world.

    “Though Communism is at present little talked about, vegetating in forgotten attics on miserable straw pallets, it is nevertheless the dismal hero destined to play a great, if transitory role in the modern tragedy…

    “[It will be] the old absolutist tradition…but in different clothes and with new slogans and catch-phrases…there will then be only one shepherd with an iron crook and one identically shorn, identically bleating human herd…Somber times loom ahead…I advise our grandchildren to be born with a very thick skin.”[64]

    Moses Mendelssohn was a strong proponent of assimilation, and by 1871, Jews “had become Germans in speech, outlook, and culture, as well as their patriotic feelings.”[65]

    Yet full assimilation was another way to embrace German mores, which progressively had become more secular and somewhat Masonic in nature and ideology.

    Heinrich Heine

    At the dawn of the nineteenth century, Jewish intellectuals began to embrace Enlightenment principles and distance themselves from the “darkness” of the Talmud. Instead of the Talmud, they began to embrace Godtthold Ephraim Lessing’s play Nathan der Weise, in which we are told that all the major religions—namely Christianity, Judaism, and Islam—are false.

    E. Michael Jones argued that the play was Masonic in nature.[66] But this form of covert operation was another way to keep revolutionaries away from ultimate reason and the cross. Jewish philologist Hermann Steinthal bragged that “

    “Together with the prophets, it is Lessing, Herder, Kant, Fichte, Schiller, and Goethe and the two Humboldts who arouse our enthusiasm—and they could not have emerged from any other people.”[67]

    Assimilation, in many ways, was a break from the “darkness” of the Talmud. But that form of assimilation drew many Jewish intellectuals to the Enlightenment ideology, which we saw was Masonic in its ideological orientation. Jewish historian Barbara Tuchman acknowledged,

    “The process begins with the ‘Enlightenment’ initiated by Moses Mendelssohn in 18th century Germany, which shattered the protective shell of orthodoxy and opened the way to acquaintance with Western culture and participation in Western affairs. The reign of the Talmud and the rabbis was broken. All over Europe the shattered windows were flying open. Jews read Voltaire and Rousseau, Goethe and Kant. The reform movement followed, shedding the old rituals, trying to adjust Judaism to the modern world.”[68]

    Many of the Jews at that time saw that “assimilation into German society was completely consonant with being a ‘good Jew.’”[69] They appreciated German culture and mores, and even contributed to its advancement.

    Assimilation was such a major theme among Jewish communities that Henry Oswalt, a Jew and grandfather of Michael Hauck, “forbade his daughter to marry a Jew. She obeyed. The grandfather, whose mother was a cousin of Heinrich Heine’s, wanted the family to be more German and accepted by society.”[70]

    Assimilation, to some extent, proved to be better than the “darkness of the Talmud”:

    “In Prussia’s war against France from 1870 to 1871, 12,000 Jews served: 120 were officers and 373 received the Iron Cross; 483 died or were wounded during the war…After the war’s victorious conclusion, many Jews felt their service entitled them to enter the ranks of the German elite.”[71]

    There were still some doubts about how loyal the Jews were, particularly since Europe went through a revolution in 1848, led exclusively by Jews. But Jewish soldiers who remained loyal to German culture and mores were highly honored for their service.

    “German Jews displayed their willingness to make the supreme sacrifice for their country time and time again when Germany went to war.”[72]

    Arno J. Mayer

    The same thing was happening in France. Jewish historian Arno Mayer notes, “During the Great War as well as between the wars, the assimilationists were intensely patriotic. They were also good republicans, dividing their support between the traditional right and the moderate left.”[73]

    Suspicions of Jews as revolutionaries gradually faded, since many proved themselves to be good soldiers, particularly in Germany.

    “In 1760, the ‘enlightened despot’ Frederick the Great promoted the Jew Konstantin Nathanael von Salemon to general for his bravery in battle…Frederick also employed some Schutzjuden, who had become court Jews, as general purveyors to his army…The king also encouraged the Jews under his rule to build factories to supply his army.

    “Veitel Ephraim and Daniel Itzig possibly ‘helped Frederick avoid defeat’ during the Seven Years’ War by supplying and equipping his troops. In recognition for his intelligence and contribution to society, Frederick granted the German-Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn exemptions from some of the laws restricting Jews’ freedom.”[74]

    Yet Rigg declares that “this should not imply that Frederick liked Jews—he in fact detested them. But it seems his hatred did not cloud his reason. He knew he needed some Jews to ensure the smooth running of his country.”[75]

    Reason certainly belies this claim. If he detested Jews so much, why would he grant Mendelssohn exemptions from some of the laws? Surely Frederick was not ignorant of Jewish revolutionary activities, and it stands to reason that he probably was suspicious because of that.

    But when the Jews proved themselves to be men of honor, they received the accolades any other German would. Many of the Jews were so loyal to the German culture that “on 11 March 1812, Prussia’s first prime minister, Karl August von Hardenberg, emancipated the Jews and allowed them to perform military service.”[76]

    “During Prussia’s War of Independence from 1813 to 1815, a conservative estimate of 731 Prussian Jews served in the war against Napoleon. Five hundred and sixty-one of them were volunteers. One German Jew wrote, ‘Who doesn’t rejoice to hear the honorable call to fight and conquer for the Fatherland…Oh Death for the Fatherland, you’re the most beautiful fate to befall any mortal.’”[77] Some of the stories of those Jews who stood in high regard in the army are worth mentioning:

    “Luise Grafemus (real name Esther Manuel) decided to join the Prussian army after she lost her Jewish husband in battle. She served during the battles of 1813 and 1814 and later became a Wachtmeister. She was wounded twice in battle and received the Iron Cross.

    “During the battle at Belle-Alliance (Waterloo) in 1815 alone, 55 Jewish soldiers of the reserve militia died in combat. Prussia decorated 82 Jews with the Iron Cross, and one received the Pour le Merite decoration between 1813 and 1815…

    “Moses Mendelssohn’s youngest son, Nathan, reported for duty in 1813 and later became a lieutenant. According to the records, 23 of these Prussian Jewish soldiers became officers: one major and 22 lieutenants.”[78]

    Moses Mendelssohn

    In World War I, about 10,000 Jews “volunteered for duty, and over 100,000 out of a total German-Jewish population of 550,000 served during World War I. Some 78 percent saw frontline duty, 12,000 died in battle, over 30,000 received decorations, and 19,000 were promoted.

    “Approximately 2,000 Jews became military officers, and 1,200 became medical officers…One Jewish pilot, Lieutenant Wilhelm Frakl, died in action and received the prestigious Pour le Merite…The youngest Jewish volunteer of the war was thirteen-year-old Joseph Zippes. He lost both legs during combat.”[79]

    Jews stood with the Germans and showed their patriotism through their deeds. A letter which was written by a German Jew declared that Jews and Germans “are united, one people, one army. In love and loyalty we get along. We stand together! All differences disappear…there is only one people in our land! We fight for the kaiser and the Reich.”[80]

    German-Jewish philosopher Hermann Cohen expressed a similar sentiment. In 1914, one Jew wrote, “The German Jews stand shoulder to shoulder with their Christian comrades without anyone asking about ancestry or religion.”

    Sergeant Fritz Beckhardt, “a Jew, flew a plane with a swastika on its side to display his German pride.”[81] This certainly puts the Goldhagen thesis in a historically uncomfortable position.

    What should all these historical accounts teach us? First, it must be pointed out that there were problems with the assimilation process in Germany.[82]

    It must also be re-emphasized that people should be cherished for who they are, for as Winston Churchill rightly put it, people can be good, bad, and indifferent. Churchill moved on to add quite powerfully that

    “Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct.”[83]

    This is certainly an important, and it is quite in line with what the Church has been saying for thousands of years. The Church has been echoing that Jewish revolutionaries embrace subversive movements not because their DNA is corrupt—a morally disgusting and logically repugnant argument which has made inroads in racialist literature, too much to detail here—but because they reject metaphysical reason or ultimate Logos. Logos, as we shall see in a future article, is the source of the moral and political order. Once Logos is rejected, metaphysical and political chaos reigns.

    And once that metaphysical rejection is codified in a theological text—the Talmud—the breeding ground for political, economic, and spiritual revolution is therefore firmly planted in the minds of those revolutionaries in one way or another.

    But the issue always takes place in the theological realm and then works its way down to the political and intellectual realm with severe consequences.

    One person who indirectly ended up admitting this point was one-time cultural phenomenon Elizabeth Wurtzel. She argued that people like her “are hopeless Talmudists”[84] who draw their ideological and sexual politics from the well of the Talmud.

    In that sense, Wurtzel is quite in agreement with Benjamin Disraeli in his 1844 novel Coningsby, in which he declared that Jewish revolutionaries have always taken part in revolutionary and intellectual movements in Europe, and Russia and Germany happened to be two of their victims.[85]

    It must be emphasized again that here we are not fighting against decent people who embrace docility, civility, and rationality. We are fighting against a wicked ideology and the consequences of that weltanschauung.

    That wicked ideology is the enemy of the Jewish people precisely because it always creates anti-Jewish reactions whenever it is applied logically and consistently. And flashes of that wicked ideology and double standards are all over the Ukraine crisis.

    YouTube – Veterans Today -

    [1] Paul Kendall, “The Jews Who Fought for Hitler: ‘We Did Not Help the Germans. We Had a Common Enemy,’” Telegraph, March 9, 2014.

    [2] Ibid.

    [3] Walter Laqueur, “Hitler’s Jews: Max Von Oppenheim and the Myth of German Jewish Guilt,” Tablet Magazine, August 21, 2013.

    [4] Bryan Mark Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2002), 1.

    [5] Laqueur, “Hitler’s Jews: Max Von Oppenheim and the Myth of German Jewish Guilt,” Tablet Magazine, August 21, 2013.

    [6] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 1.

    [7] Ibid., 51.

    [8] Ibid., 96.

    [9] Ibid., 98.

    [10] Sarah Gordon, Hitler, Germans, and the “Jewish Question” (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), 47.

    [11] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 1, 19-20.

    [12] Ibid., 24.

    [13] Albert S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 332.

    [14] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 1-2.

    [15] Ibid., 12.

    [16] Ibid., 10.

    [17] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 51.

    [18] Rigg, Rescued from the Reich: How One of Hitler’s Soldiers Saved the Lubavitcher Rebbe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), 10.

    [19] Ibid., 10.

    [20] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 164.

    [21] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 12.

    [22] Ibid., 12.

    [23] Ibid., 12.

    [24] Ibid., 24-25.

    [25] Ibid., 13.

    [26] Ibid., 25.

    [27] Ibid., 15.

    [28] Ibid., 15.

    [29] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 331.

    [30] Ibid., 141

    [31] Ibid., 331.

    [32] Ibid., 443.

    [33] See Howard M. Sachar, A History of the Jews in America (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992), chapter 14.

    [34] Ibid., 465.

    [35] Ibid., 751.

    [36] Howard M. Sachar, A History of the Jews in the Modern World (New York: Vintage Books, 2006), 326.

    [37] Ibid., 227-228.

    [38] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 331.

    [39] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 48.

    [40] See Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York: Vintage Books, 1997).

    [41] Norman Finkelstein and Ruth Bettina Birn, A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth (New York: Henry Holt, 1998), 7.

    [42] See Yehuda Bauer, Rethinking the Holocaust (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), chapter five. Even he takes issue with some of Goldhagen’s citations: “Goldhagen puts all anti-Semitism in the same basket, including the liberal type that wanted to see the Jews disappear by assimilation and conversion. He quotes Uriel Tal, but Tal never said that liberal efforts to assimilate the Jews were the same as extermination programs” (98).

    [43] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 332.

    [44] Gordon, The “Jewish Question”, 27.

    [45] Ibid., 29.

    [46] Ibid., 32.

    [47] Ibid., 48.

    [48] Ibid., 13.

    [49] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 51.

    [50] MacDonald, Separation, 220; also Bakan, Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition, 46.

    [51] Ibid.

    [52] Lindemann, Esau’s Tears, 162.

    [53] MacDonald, Separation., 220.

    [54] Erich E. Haberer, Jews and Revolution in Nineteeth-Century Russia (Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 9.

    [55] Benjamin Nathans, Beyond the Pale: Jewish Encounter with Late Imperial Russia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), 201-202.

    [56] Haberer, Jews and Revolution in Russia, 11.

    [57] Ibid., 16, 17.

    [58] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 581.

    [59] Ibid.

    [60] Ibid., 582.

    [61] Ibid.

    [62] Ibid., 584.

    [63] MacDonald, Separation, 220.

    [64] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 582-583.

    [65] Ibid., 584.

    [66] Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 563-566.

    [67] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 51-52.

    [68] Quoted in Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 565.

    [69] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 51-52.

    [70] Ibid., 54.

    [71] Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers, 70.

    [72] Ibid., 66.

    [73] Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?, 48.

    [74] Gordon, The “Jewish Question”, 66, 67.

    [75] Ibid., 67.

    [76] Ibid.

    [77] Ibid., 68.

    [78] Ibid.

    [79] Ibid., 72.

    [80] Ibid.

    [81] Ibid., 73.

    [82] E. Michael Jones has done a great work analyzing this in chapter 13 of his magnum opus The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. I could not address all these issues here because time constraints.

    [83] Winston Churchill, “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: The Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Sunday Illustrated Herald, February 8, 1920.

    [84] Elizabeth Wurtzel, “Standing Against a Tide of Hatred,” Guardian, January 16, 2009.

    [85] Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby (Boston: Adamant Media Corporation, 2005), 299.


    Interesting with well-sourced citations.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

    Heartbleed Internet Bug: Moving Toward Government Control of the Internet

    Company that found bug has connections to Google, Obama, DHS, and FBI

    Kurt Nimmo
    April 9, 2013

    Dire warnings about Heartbleed, a serious internet security risk affecting millions of websites, is echoing across the internet today. Described as a flaw in OpenSSL, the open source encryption technology used by the vast majority of web servers, Heartbleed is said to put HTTPS e-commerce websites at risk.

    Heartbleed Explained - April 8, 2014


    Heartbleed: ‘Secure’ internet wasn’t safe - April 9, 2014


    The bug “can give hackers access to personal data like credit card numbers, usernames, passwords, and, perhaps most importantly, cryptographic keys—which can allow hackers to impersonate or monitor a server,” writes Lily Hay Newman.


    The risk was discovered by a Google researcher at Codenomicon, a Finnish company specializing in the development of “fuzzing tools” to ensure computer network security. The Codenomicon client base includes government and the defense industry and, as noted below, has suspicious connections to Obama, DHS, and the FBI.


    The current buzz about Heartbleed plays into an ongoing government propaganda campaign to forge a public-private cybersecurity infrastructure. The latest warning came from the Communications Director for Willis Global Energy Practice during a seminar held in London. He said the “energy industry is sitting on an unexploded bomb from uninsured cyber attacks” due, in large part, to web-based control systems which are routinely insecure.


    In 2010, the effort to portray the internet as vulnerable and in need of government protection took the shape of a simulated cyber attack. The war game was organized by the Bipartisan Policy Center, an insider think tank, and sponsored by “companies with financial stakes in the future of cyber defense — General Dynamics is one — but also companies whose transactions are the lifeblood to the American economy, and who want to foster a greater sense of urgency among the public and policymakers,” according to Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic.


    Cyber attacks often seem timed to underscore government cybersecurity talking points and proposed legislation. For instance, in February, an unprecedented denial of service attack occurred several days after the National Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act found its way to the House floor. The legislation, supported by Republicans and Democrats, codifies “an equal partnership between private industry and DHS.”


    The government considers this merging of government and corporate operations – basically corporatism, as Mussolini defined it – so essential Senator Jay Rockefeller tried to get the Cybersecurity Act of 2013 added as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act.


     EFF @EFF

    Takeaway from Heartbleed: Live every day as if you’ll lose your SSL private keys tomorrow. Use forward secrecy.


    Earlier this month, former Sen. Evan Bayh, an Indiana Democrat, told the American Bar Association Section of International Law 2014 Spring Meeting in New York Congress is unlikely to pass cybersecurity legislation this session.


    “I think it’s not likely there will be legislative action” Bayh said. “That’s too bad. It will probably take a cyberattack succeeding in some way that significantly harms the country before we’ll be able to reconcile the debate in Washington about legislation.”


    Bayh said a large cyberattack would likely result in “some mandatory standards that will make what’s been proposed, at least right now, pale in comparison. Because we always way overreact once we’ve been attacked, and both sides need to get that in their minds, because that’s what is coming,” he said.


    Bayh, who sat on the Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence, is now on the CIA’s advisory board. Due to this fact, his warning and prediction, expressed as a foregone conclusion, carries extraordinary weight.


    Finally, it should be noted that Howard Schmidt, the former Cybersecurity Coordinator and Special Assistant to Obama, sits on the board of directors of Codenomicon.


    Schmidt, who also worked for the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, “was responsible for coordinating interagency cybersecurity policy development and implementation and coordinated engagement with federal, state, local, international and private sector cybersecurity partners,” a company page on the Codenomicon Defensics page states.


    It is telling a company linked to Google, with its known intelligence connections, and having a member of the board of directors connected directly to the Obama administration’s cyber security initiative in addition to the DHS and the FBI, should discover a network vulnerability begging a government intervention. Source


    A Cyber False Flag to take over the internet? If the internet is handed over to the UN – it places us under the hammer of the Global Corporists. It’s conjecture but certainly bears watching.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment