Dr. Tom Frieden, Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), underwent decontamination procedures after leaving an Ebola treatment unit in Liberia’s capital city of Monrovia. (Photo: CDC/Sally Ezra)
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
by Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) A jaw-dropping report released by the World Health Organization on October 14, 2014 reveals that 1 in 20 Ebola infections has an incubation period longer than the 21 days which has been repeatedly claimed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.
This may be the single most important — and blatantly honest — research report released by any official body since the beginning of the Ebola outbreak. The WHO’s “Ebola situation assessment” report, found here, explains that only 95% of Ebola infections experience incubation within the widely-reported 21-day period. Here’s the actual language from the report:
95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval. 
Unless the sentence structure is somehow misleading, this passage appears to indicate the following:
• 95% of Ebola incubations occur from 1 – 21 days
• 3% of Ebola incubations occur from 21 – 42 days
• 2% of Ebola incubations are not explained (why?)
If this interpretation of the WHO’s statistics are correct, it would mean that:
• 1 in 20 Ebola infections may result in incubations lasting significantly longer than 21 days
• The 21-day quarantine currently being enforced by the CDC is entirely insufficient to halt an outbreak
• People who are released from observation or self-quarantine after 21 days may still become full-blown Ebola patients in the subsequent three weeks, even if they have shown no symptoms of infection during the first 21 days. (Yes, read that again…)
Any declaration that an outbreak is over requires 42 days with no new infections
Underscoring the importance of the 42-day rule, the WHO document openly states that a 42-day observation period with no new outbreaks is required before declaring the outbreak is under control. In the WHO’s own words:
WHO is therefore confident that detection of no new cases, with active surveillance in place, throughout this 42-day period means that an Ebola outbreak is indeed over. 
W.H.O. “alarmed” over false pronouncements of negative Ebola tests
Just as disturbing is the WHO’s open warning that government health officials who are announcing negative Ebola findings in patients mere hours after them being tested are grossly misleading the public and essentially practicing quack medicine.
As explained by the WHO:
WHO is alarmed by media reports of suspected Ebola cases imported into new countries that are said, by government officials or ministries of health, to be discarded as “negative” within hours after the suspected case enters the country. Such rapid determination of infection status is impossible, casting grave doubts on some of the official information that is being communicated to the public and the media. 
In other words, WHO is telling us that all those public pronouncements by government health authorities are meaningless. An Ebola infection determination cannot be made in mere hours, it turns out. In fact, as WHO explains, a suspected case of Ebola must be observed and tested for 48 hours before any degree of certainty can be reached about the Ebola infection status:
Two negative RT-PCR test results, at least 48 hours apart, are required for a clinically asymptomatic patient to be discharged from hospital, or for a suspected Ebola case to be discarded as testing negative for the virus. 
“No signs” that outbreaks are under control
Finally, this WHO report goes on to conclude that the Ebola outbreaks of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone are multiplying out of control. The report even cites the curious phenomenon of unexpected outbreak surges taking place in areas once thought to be eradicated:
In Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, new cases continue to explode in areas that looked like they were coming under control. An unusual characteristic of this epidemic is a persistent cyclical pattern of gradual dips in the number of new cases, followed by sudden flare-ups. WHO epidemiologists see no signs that the outbreaks in any of these 3 countries are coming under control. 
Is it possible that these resurging outbreaks are being caused by governments failing to monitor potentially infected Ebola victims for a full 42 days? If they only observe them for 21 days, then 1 out of 20 infected victims may be cleared as “clean” and allowed back into the population where they soon become symptomatic and spread the disease even further.
U.S. doctors and health officials have been taught the wrong number: 21 days is only HALF the duration
It is extremely disturbing to realize that, to our best knowledge, every single person in the United States who has been suspected of harboring Ebola has been instructed to monitor symptoms for only 21 days, not the necessary 42 days.
This means that Ebola-infected U.S. citizens who are “cleared” of Ebola may still erupt with the deadly virus for a period of three more weeks.
Why hasn’t anyone reported this until now? How is this not one of the single most important pieces of information in the world at this moment when all human life on our planet is now legitimately threatened by an uncontrolled viral outbreak with a 70 percent fatality rate and no recognized treatments or cures?
Prepare yourself now with the free downloadable MP3 audio files at www.BioDefense.com
Sources for this article include:
Learn more: natural news
MC: I watched the Cspan video of the: “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Tom Frieden and other witnesses testify before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on U.S. efforts to control the ongoing Ebola outbreak.” Frieden stated numerous times that it was 21 days (in fact, he appeared to know more of what was happening in west Africa than the USA) – never once did he mention 41 or 42 days! Why do we need to find our these important points by ourselves?
Dr. Frieden video from the USA Embaassy Network:
Did Dr. Frieden learn from his mistake by not closing the airports to travelers from West Africa?
Well, not exactly as sometimes stupidity gets compounded by more stupidity.
Frieden recently responded to calls from the media to seal the border from West African travelers who were potentially exposed to Ebola, Frieden claimed officials can monitor such people as they travel into the U.S. But wait, the stupidity does not stop here.
Frieden also claimed Ebola is “not a significant public health threat to the United States.”
Frieden went on to say that “You cannot get Ebola by sitting next to someone on a bus, but that infected or exposed persons should not ride public transportation because they could transmit the disease to someone else”. If you feel compelled to reread this statement again and again, you are probably not alone.
Frieden also reiterated that the CDC is currently tracking down and monitoring those who were on the same flight as a health care worker just before she was diagnosed with Ebola. Don’t you just this “horse out of the barn strategy”?
Frieden went on to say that “Because the risk is so low, we think there is an extremely low likelihood that anyone who traveled on this plane would have been exposed, but we’re putting into place extra margins of safety and we’re contacting everyone who was on that flight.”
President Barack Obama has his own antidote to this abject stupidity as he said this past Thursday night that it “may be appropriate” for him to appoint a czar to lead his administration’s response to Ebola.”It may make sense for us to have one person … so that after this initial surge of activity, we can have a more regular process just to make sure that we’re crossing all the T’s and dotting all the I’s going forward”. Why not bring back Van Jones?
What do these people do at night, watch reruns of The Three Stooges? These political circus clowns are doing a damn good job of imitating Larry, Moe and Curly Joe.
Are They Really This Stupid, Or Is Something Else At Work?
With the kind of incompetence and inaction being demonstrated by Obama and his minions, it is easy to understand how rumors become rampant and these rumors can escalate into a new hysterical new paradigm. I am at the eye of the storm of this phenomenon. Yesterday, I was told the following:
- A member of an intelligence agency told an acquaintance of mine that Liberians are being flown into the U.S. and are being relocated all across the country. This is being done presumably to spread Ebola. I have no way of substantiating the claim even though the person telling me is reliable, this is not proof.
- I was told by a trusted friend that a commander at a major military base has privately revealed that Ebola is an Obama administration false flag event. Subsequently, I have received an email from a party which stated the same with regard to the same commander.
I once spoke at a public gathering and I asked the audience if they could name just one positive thing that the Obama administration has done for the American middle class. I have repeated this question multiple times on my talk show and to date, nobody has been able answer in the affirmative with an example. I am right there with the rest of you. Obama seems intent on dismantling this country as we know it and he is succeeding. However, I am not reporting these two rumors as proof of some conspiracy no matter how trusted the sources. To do so, I would need some collaborative evidence. However, it is completely understandable how these stories surface as people seek to make sense out of the nonsensical actions of this administration.
Yet, sometimes a story surfaces that changes everything
The Most Important Story On Ebola To Date
Paul Joseph Watson may written the most important article on the Ebola crisis to date. After reading the following summary of an exclusive interview conducted by Watson with Richard C. Davis, M.D., a former flight surgeon with the U.S. Navy, I suspect that this administration would move to block a cure for Ebola.
Davis told Watson that he was leading a project to develop a drug called RC-2Beta, which Davis proclaimed was “at the core of our cells to enhance mitochondrial efficiency and promote gene signaling to stimulate cellular self-repair and pathogen destruction.” In common language, Davis was saying that they had developed a treatment “Killed four of the world’s deadliest viruses in a dose-dependent fashion. The Army also noted that uninfected cells in the same cultures were untouched by the drug (i.e., it was non-toxic).”
This is not rumor or speculation. Paul Joseph Watson has found the smoking gun. This administration does not want to find a “cure” for the present crisis for the same reason that they won’t shut down the border to bioterrorists and for the same reason that they don’t want to close airports to West African travelers. The authorities do not want to come to a resolution to this matter. And why not? To answer that question, you simply have to follow the money.
Over the past month, I written several articles on the profit motive connected to the present crisis. I documented three areas which relate to the reasons why this administration would stop work on an Ebola cure two weeks prior to the outbreak.
- The CDC holds the patent to Ebola and all strains up to 70% of the variance.
- The NIH owns the Crucell patent which was tested eight years ago on human test subjects.
- Bill Gates invested $560 million dollars into the Global Fund who distribute the Ebola vaccine early next year.
I revealed these facts and more in a series of articles beginning on September 17, 2014 to the present week.
When we consider the inaction of the Obama administration and the accompanying profit motives associated with the present crisis, it is difficult to believe that these events are not being orchestrated by this administration.