Endangered tortoise is being used as justification to assault Nevada rancher’s property rights!!!
~~
Clark County is in the southern region of Nevada. Bundy is in defiance of a 2013 court order which demands he remove his cattle from US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM). His family has grazed the 600,000 public land since the 1800s. Bundy had this to say about the armed federal agents attempting to remove his cattle from the Gold Butte area: “I have raised cattle on that land, which is public land for the people of Clark County, all my life. Why I raise cattle there and why I can raise cattle there is because I have preemptive rights. Who is the trespasser here? Who is the trespasser on this…
Heavily armed federal agents have converged on Clark County, Nevada to stop the grazing of cattle on public lands. The standoff has been brewing for decades and only one rancher still remains in the fight. Cliven Bundy has likened the fight against the federal government in support of both individual rights and states’ rights to the Ruby Ridge and Waco tragedies.
Clark County is in the southern region of Nevada. Bundy is in defiance of a 2013 court order which demands he remove his cattle from US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management. His family has grazed the 600,000 public land since the 1800s.
.
Bundy had this to say about the armed federal agents attempting to remove his cattle from the Gold Butte area:
“I have raised cattle on that land, which is public land for the people of Clark County, all my life. Why I raise cattle there and why I can raise cattle there is because I have preemptive rights. Who is the trespasser here? Who is the trespasser on this land? Is the United States trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Or is it Cliven Bundy who is trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Who’s the trespasser?”
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US National Park Service officials have deployed armed federal agents, “contract cowboys,” aka Cattle Rustlers – and possibly snipers to restrict Bundy’s access to the Gold Butte public land. When asked by journalist to confirm the snipers Carol Bundy, Cliven’s wife, believes she saw near their home, federal officials would neither confirm or deny the deployment of such agents to the Gold Butte public lands area.
A statement from federal officials about the longstanding battle over cattle grazing on public lands in Nevada reads:
“Cattle have been in trespass on public lands in southern Nevada for more than two decades. This is unfair to the thousands of other ranchers who graze livestock in compliance with federal laws and regulations throughout the West. The Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. An impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is now being conducted as a last resort.” (MC->there’s very few of them left since they were run off by the BLM already)
To date, approximately 235 of Bundy’s 900 so-called trespass cattle, have been impounded by the federal government. In 1993 the Nevada rancher stopped paying the grazing fees required by the Bureau of Land Management. In court filings related to the case, Cliven Bundy stated that he was not obligated to pay such fees because his Mormon ancestors had worked the Gold Butte lands in question long before the agency had been created.
The Clark County public lands were declared off limits for cattle in 1998 when the area became a designated habitat for the federally protected desert tortoise. “It’s a freedom issue. It’s not about the cows. It’s a state rights issue,” Bundy said.
Ranchers and energy producers in five states are currently embroiled in a similar battle over private land usage and property rights due to the new protective status of the lesser prairie chicken. Some see the emerging restrictions on public and private land usage, and EPA pond and water usage limits, as a furtherance of the Agenda 21 initiative.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1205241/cliven-bundy-range-war-brewing-in-nevada-over-cattle-grazing-on-public-land/#MRCih6ERpPme1Byt.99
.
Bottomline: It’s not about turtles. It’s about fracking and huge profits for the International Globalists who use the UN as their “global office”. The Clinton Globalists instigated this “environmental” land grab racket by signing treaties, one of them being Agenda 21, on behalf of the internationalist mafiosia…Clinton, Bush, Obama are just their foot-soldiers. “President” Wilson was among the first to sell us out…
~~~~
A brief overview of Agenda 21:
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” – Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991
The Club of Rome is a Neo-Malthusian organization with interlocking membership with European power elite groups such as the Committee of 300 and the Bilderberg Group. Thomas Robert Malthus argued that population was held within resource limits by two types of checks: positive ones, which raised the death rate, and preventative ones, which lowered the birth rate. The positive checks included hunger, disease and war; the preventative checks, abortion, birth control, prostitution, postponement of marriage, and celibacy. The Club of Rome’s members, including Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands and Mikhail Gorbachev, believe humanity requires “a common motivation, namely a common adversary” in order to realize their world government.
World Depopulation
According to the club’s publications, the common enemy of humanity is man. One of the major goals of the Club of Rome is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. Not only did the Club of Rome’s 1972 report, “Limits to Growth” call for a reduced level of consumption of resources, it also argued that humankind needs to re-evaluate its exploitative attitude towards humans and the earth itself. The failure to give more foreign aid is indicative of the increased selfishness of rich countries. Meanwhile, the world’s richest 20 per cent of the population consume 86 per cent of its goods and services, over half its energy and nearly half its meat and fish.
In the Club of Rome book, The First Global Revolution, the group called for a “limit to growth” approach to solve the world’s problems, in fact a problem the global elite has with humanity. “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill,” the book states. “All these dangers are caused by human intervention,” and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or… one invented for the purpose.” In the process of struggling against this implacable enemy, democracy “will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power.”
One World Government
Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, expanded on this topic in his article, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. According to Haass, a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming and terrorism, both invented as the Club of Rome suggested. “Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change,” writes Haass. “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.”
In 1976, the United States Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was formed for the purpose of gradually shutting down the U.S. economy. Since then, working in concert with their international counterparts, they have been pushing the junk science of climate change, fueled a global financial crisis triggered by the mortgage crisis in America resulting in $Trillions being transferred to globalist banks from countries around the world on the brink of default, and enciting revolutions throughout the Middle East that are spreading to the Western world. Our global rulers are systematically taking down the global economy in order to impose what Haass describes as “an international system of either world government or anarchy.”
The Club of Rome, headed by Maurice Strong, is THE group that takes the issue of global warming (whether real or imagined) as an excuse to institute a one world government, or new world order. Glenn Beck and guest discuss this in preparation for upcoming guest Lord Christopher Monckton.
Led by Progressives in the U.S. Congress, they have been able to pass a cap-and-trade system that will result in the largest transfer of wealth in U.S. history with relatively little opposition. In recent years, with the help of the corporate media, they have cranked up the propaganda about climate change and will eventually impose punitive carbon taxes on the American people, a scheme that may eventually lead to the near complete reversal of hundreds of years of technological progress and man’s return to the stone age. via: http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/club-of-rome.html
.
Informative site with credible sourcing – includes info on Agenda 2, members etc…..
http://green-agenda.com/index.html
or it on this site….
The Green Agenda: Club of Rome – Club of Budapest – Club of Madrid
Australia To The UN: No More “Socialism Masquerading As Environmentalism” (Agenda 21)
mediachecker 